|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 23, 2017 15:01:01 GMT
My favorite adaptations include:
Hamlet (1996) Richard III (1995) Richard III (1955)
|
|
|
|
Post by nausea on Apr 23, 2017 15:13:52 GMT
wtf?
|
|
|
|
Post by mcavanaugh on Apr 23, 2017 15:47:41 GMT
Some of my favorites:
Hamlet (1996) and (1948 -- even though Olivier omitted the Fortinbras plot) Richard III (1995) and (1955) Henry V (1989) and (1944) Much Ado About Nothing (1993) with Ken and Emma as Benedick and Beatrice
|
|
|
|
Post by mattgarth on Apr 23, 2017 16:18:39 GMT
I guess Anne Hathaway is the only one from Willie's whole crowd back then who's still working steady.
|
|
|
|
Post by mcavanaugh on Apr 23, 2017 16:46:35 GMT
I guess Anne Hathaway is the only one from Willie's whole crowd who's still working steady. True, Matt. Some of those British women are downright indomitable. I hear the third wife of Henry VIII, Jane Seymour, is still going strong, too.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Apr 23, 2017 16:51:02 GMT
I guess Anne Hathaway is the only one from Willie's whole crowd back then who's still working steady. I always thought it strange that his wife's parents named her for a movie star.
|
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Apr 23, 2017 17:34:10 GMT
Very disappointed, curly-hair. Not up to your usual standard of metaphysical complexity.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Apr 23, 2017 17:51:00 GMT
Very disappointed, curly-hair. Not up to your usual standard of metaphysical complexity. And this, London, is one of the rare cases on which I'll agree with you completely.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Apr 23, 2017 17:53:25 GMT
My favorite adaptations include: Hamlet (1996) Richard III (1995) Richard III (1955) Haven't seen the Branagh version of "Hamlet," nor the Olivier version of "Richard III" - I think I should watch at least one of them today; maybe "Hamlet" to start. I've meant to watch it for years. For what it's worth, I highly recommend both versions, Spider, but then I like just about everything both Branagh and Oliver have ever done. I don't agree with all of Branagh's choices in Hamlet, to be sure, and some of the cameos are a bit distracting, but it's a fine, expansive version, very cinematic and well-filmed. I think it may actually be better than Olivier's, which I recognize for its historical value but of which, like you, I'm for some reason not very fond. My favorite Shakespeare adaptation of Branagh's, though, has to be his Much Ado, which is tons of fun.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 23, 2017 17:55:04 GMT
The Merchant of Venice, starring two of my favorite actors (Pacino and Irons) is my favorite.
|
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Apr 23, 2017 17:58:47 GMT
I have watched three versions of the Scottish Play within the last year or so. I rate them, in order:
(1971) Roman Polanski (1948) Orson Welles (2015) Justin Kurzel
All are worth seeing as they have different strengths and weaknesses.
There is also Joe MacBeth (1955) directed by Ken Hughes. I was impressed with this when aged 16. Whether I still would be, I do not know, but Hughes directed some good movies among all the usual contract rubbish, including:
Wide Boy (1952) The Long Haul (1957) The Trials of Oscar Wilde (1960): the best Wilde bio in my opinion Cromwell (1970)
The latter three he also scripted. As he did Town on Trial (1957), a good Brit Noir directed by John Guillermin.
Hughes' talent is shown with The Blazing Caravan (1954) which he wrote and directed. This was one of the half-hour Edgar Lustgarten program fillers which occupied the bottom of the food-chain, but he turned this one into a nifty pocket-Film Noir on a minute budget with unknown actors.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Apr 23, 2017 18:24:17 GMT
I have watched three versions of the Scottish Play within the last year or so. I rate them, in order:
(1971) Roman Polanski (1948) Orson Welles (2015) Justin Kurzel
All are worth seeing as they have different strengths and weaknesses. There is also Joe MacBeth (1955) directed by Ken Hughes. I was impressed with this when aged 16. Whether I still would be, I do not know, but Hughes directed some good movies among all the usual contract rubbish, including: Wide Boy (1952) The Long Haul (1957) The Trials of Oscar Wilde (1960): the best Wilde bio in my opinion Cromwell (1970) The latter three he also scripted. As he did Town on Trial (1957), a good Brit Noir directed by John Guillermin. Hughes' talent is shown with The Blazing Caravan (1954) which he wrote and directed. This was one of the half-hour Edgar Lustgarten program fillers which occupied the bottom of the food-chain, but he turned this one into a nifty pocket-Film Noir on a minute budget with unknown actors. I agree with you about the first two Macbeth adaptations, and I've not seen the most recent: I found Polanski's just a trifle stronger than Orson's, probably because all of the post-production problems with the '48 version. Visually, though, the Welles version is amazingly striking--and on such a small budget, too!
|
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Apr 23, 2017 18:59:49 GMT
It takes a genius to f**k up a Shakespeare story, though some have managed it. Somehow the resonance of the original play adds backbone even to a feeble production, and if you use his actual words you are 80% home already.
The only film in which I admired Al Pacino was The Merchant of Venice (2004). He plays all his roles as if he was on the stage at the Globe bellowing to people in the gods, so it probably suited him.
Even Roland Emmerich was briefly raised up by the association, with his Anonymous (2011).
I cannot wade through Bill's 1258 writing credits so I will just mention a few I have seen recently:
Haider (2014) is about the Kashmir conflict and loosely based on Hamlet. Very good.
Ran (1982) is top-drawer Kurosawa based on King Lear.
My favorite Shakespeare play is The Tempest. Two versions I have seen lately really disappointed: (2010) Julie Taymor with Helen Mirren as Prospero. Use Bill's words and they are beautifully enunciated, but horrible special effects and CGI. The latter is no longer a novelty, Julie. No-one is impressed. (1982) "Tempest" dir: Paul Mazursky (loosely based on Bill's tale) starring John Cassavetes. I kept looking at my watch.
Titus (1999) also directed by Julie Taymor. Not great but I had forgotten the story so glad to have seen it.
Richard III (1995) updated to an imaginary fascist Britain in the 1930s. Not great.
Richard III (1955) Olivier. That's the way to do it!
Julius Caesar (1953) Joseph L. Mankiewicz. Some refreshingly controlled acting by Marlon Brando as Mark Antony, backed by a stellar cast of former District Attorneys, Mafia bosses, patient WWII grass widows and ranch-hands. Very good.
Then there is that deserved and popular Oscar winner Shakespeare in Love (1998) with almost as many famous Brits as a Harry Potter movie. No doubt Ben Affleck was flattered to work alongside all these present or future knight and dames, not realizing he was the butt of a joke, being cast as a good-natured but vain and none too bright matinee idol. The weakest part of this movie are the rom-com love scenes which give it its title. The best part is the depiction of behind-the-scenes theater life, with witty analogies to modern times.
And the closing titles are the best ever. Very moving but also a "hook" to Bill's next play. Under all the pastiche and fun is a serious study of artistic inspiration.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Apr 23, 2017 19:38:35 GMT
I hope my long reply doesn't tax anyone's patience. I tend to get carried away when talking or writing about Shakespeare. I've read through the replies thus far and already know that some of my conclusions are going to clash with those of others. But, as Stuart Smalley would say, "That's...OK."
“I love Shakespeare. He wrote some of the rawest stories, man. I mean look at Romeo and Juliet. That's some serious ghetto sh-t." - Tupac
Titus / Julie Taymor (1999). Taymor (a name that will come up two more times in this list) makes a case for one of Shakespeare’s earliest and most reviled plays. Taymor ups the visual interest to 11 while retaining much of the dialog. The cast is near perfect. Anthony Hopkins is the title character, Alan Cumming plays Saturninus as an entitled spoiled brat, and Harry Lennix chews some scenery marvelously as Aaron. But it is Jessica Lange who will chill you, thrill you and fulfill you as the evil Queen Tamora.
Romeo And Juliet / Franco Zeffirelli (1968). This film had a profound influence on a generation and beyond. Not only did it turn on its generation to Shakespeare, it replaced “Julius Caesar” as the go-to play to teach in high school. As, now, a play of its time in the late ‘60s, schools dumped one of Shakespeare’s few plays with no sex to one with tons of sex.
Romeo + Juliet / Baz Luhrman (1996). R&J for the next generation. This film startled and shook up some Shakespeare purists, but, for me, it is a real thriller and truly tragic (made even more so – and more cruel - by a slight tinkering with the final death scenes.)
The Taming Of The Shrew / Franco Zeffirelli (1967). La Liz and Dickie (for the younger set, that's Elizabeth Taylor and her husband Richard Burton) in Shakespeare's anti-feminist romp (or is it subtly subversive of the patriarchal society of the Early Modern Period?).
A Midsummer Night’s Dream / Peter Hall (1968). Excellent film of a RSC production with a top-flight cast. Helen Mirren, David Warner, Michael Jayston, and Diana Rigg as the four lovers from Athens, Ian Holm as Puck, Paul Rogers as Bottom, and best of all, Ian Richardson and Judi Dench as the sexiest King and Queen of the Fairies that you will ever find. Can’t miss.
A Midsummer Night’s Dream / Julie Taymor (2014). This is a film of a production at the Theater for a New Audience in Brooklyn in 2013. It was shot with multiple cameras over four nights and then edited like a regular movie. Highly recommended, especially if unfamiliar with the play. A good time will be had by all. Due on DVD later in 2017.
The Merchant Of Venice / Michael Radford. (2004). Al Pacino gets his chance at a full-length Shakespearean movie role and he nails it so completely that he may have ruined it for every other actor. “Merchant” is the Bard’s most controversial and disturbing play because of the portrayal of the Jewish money lender, Shylock (Pacino), in Venice.
Much Ado About Nothing / Kenneth Branagh (1993) Much Ado About Nothing / Joss Whedon (2012)
The world’s first rom-com and one of my favorite plays is given two top-notch film productions, just about 20 years apart. The 1993 “Much Ado” is on my Top 10 of the ‘90s. The Whedon film is a truly amazing work that gave me chills of horror when I first heard it announced, but came to looking forward to its release and left the theater walking on air. Amy Acker (Beatrice) is a true discovery. Nathan Fillion (Serenity, Castle), who had never acted Shakespeare before and was very doubtful about accepting the role, is impossibly funny as the vocabulary challenged constable. He is my personal Best Supporting Actor of 2012.
Twelfth Night, or What You Will / Paul Kafno (1988). Although Kafno is credited as director of the television film, what is being performed is a stage production directed by Kenneth Branagh. Branagh makes more of a serious dramatic play from the materials than is usual. I have seen a couple of university stagings that were hilarious, but the Branagh’s actors find a more serious, perhaps melancholy, path
Julius Caesar / Joseph L. Mankiewicz (1953). Mankiewicz had to shoot this on the cheap (using sets left over from “Quo Vadis”) to get the project approved. The biggest budget item were two British actors, James Mason and John Gielgud as Brutus and Cassius. In what some considered stunt casting, Marlon Brando in only his fourth film got the call as Marc Antony. Brando triumphs, proving once and for all that he could act in more than modern drama and that The Method was viable even in Shakespeare - and this has proved to be so to this day (see also Al Pacino, above).
The Hollow Crown.
Richard II Henry IV parts 1 and 2 Henry V Henry VI parts 1, 2, and 3 Richard III
The BBC undertook a series of Shakespeare’s War Of The Roses historical chronicles and has turned in a major triumph on every front. “Richard II” stars Ben Whishaw as Richard, Rory Kinnear (The Imitation Game) as Richard’s usurper, David Suchet as York, and Patrick Stewart as John of Gaunt. Tom Hiddleston carries the next three plays as, first, as Prince Hal who cavorts at the Mermaid Tavern with Sir John Falstaff (Simon Russell Beale) but who converts into the heroic King Henry V. But Henry dies young, leaving an infant son as his heir. Henry VI grew to be a weak, easily led monarch who was unfit for rule. Many military battles and internal power struggles leaves the evil Richard of Gloucester as King. There is lots of location filming, wonderful natural acting, understandable spoken language, and many thrills and horrors. Capping the series is Benedict Cumberbatch’s definitive Richard. He is so great that I get goose bumps just thinking about it. One thing I learned from this production was how important Henry VI, part 3 is to Richard III. It is essential to Richard’s backstory. It explains who all these people at the beginning of “Richard III” are: why they are quarrelling, why they hate each other, and who that crazy woman is who roams the castle ranting curses at people. See them all. See them now.
Hamlet / John Gielgud (1964) Hamlet / Gregory Doren (2009)
In 1963 Richard Burton attacked the title role in a Broadway production directed by John Gielgud. This movie is a film of one of the actual nights with the sounds of the New York audience very much in evidence. Burton’s voice and portrayal are very muscular and masculine. The Gregory Doren film, starring David Tennant (the tenth Doctor on “Doctor Who”) and Patrick Stewart as King Claudius, is a film of a stage production that played to critical acclaim and sold-out houses during one summer at the Globe in Stratford. When the play moved to London’s West End in the Fall, the entire run of the play was booked between 6:00 am and lunchtime on the first day tickets were available. From the evidence of this film, the support was deserved. Nothing is done by rote. Every character, his/her motivation, thoughts and feelings have been carefully re-thought in light of modern psychology and acting styles. Tennant gives us a Hamlet for this time in history. Patrick Stewart is the best King Claudius I have ever seen. Period. Very, very highly recommended.
King Lear / Edwin Sherin (1974). This was filmed live in front of an audience as part of Joseph Papp’s New York Shakespeare Festival at an outdoor theater in Central Park. James Earl Jones plays the title King and, as far as I am concerned, he is definitive until proven otherwise. His towering portrayal of Lear is of a commanding man who, because of slights and degradations both real and imagined that come from those closest to him, is reduced to a sad and impotent figure still trying to hold on to some majesty. Raul Julia makes a fine sarcastic villain in Edmund. Rosalind Cash plays the eldest evil daughter, Goneril, while Lee Chamberlin (most well known for her seasons paired with Morgan Freeman on “The Electric Company”) essays Cordelia. Paul Sorvino is Gloucester; Rene Auberjonois, Edgar. As in all productions I admire, there is truthfulness in acting (in a modern sense) and the text is respected. Wonderful.
A Performance Of Macbeth / Philip Casson (1979). Ian McKellen steps up as the noble Thane who is tempted into murder. His performance stands with one foot in the older declamatory style but with another in modern style, especially in those moments of heightened tension. Roger Rees is a standout as Malcolm. Ian McDiarmid (Emperor Palpatine) doubles as a nobleman, Ross, and scores as the Porter in the famous comedy interruption that comes between the King’s murder and its discovery. Judi Dench, though, as Lady Macbeth is the true revelation of this production. It is magnificence, indeed. She digs into the character with all her ambiguities, forcefulness, doubts and guilt.
The Tempest / Julie Taymor (2010). In switching protagonist’s gender from Prospero to Prospera and getting Helen Mirren to play the part, Taymor came up with a great idea which works. One reason is that turning Prospera/Miranda into a mother/daughter relationship makes a lot of sense and fits the lines they are given to speak. Mirren is terrific as are fellow Brits Alfred Molina, Tom Conti, Alan Cumming, and Ben Whishaw. American actors David Strathairn and Chris Cooper comport themselves like experienced Shakespeareans, which they may very well be. This was my first encounter with Russell Brand. Speaking lines from “The Tempest” made him barely tolerable. This is a solid and very enjoyable version of the Jacobean masterwork.
|
|
|
|
Post by gadolinium on Apr 23, 2017 19:43:17 GMT
Chimes at Midnight and Ran.
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Apr 24, 2017 3:13:38 GMT
I hope my long reply doesn't tax anyone's patience. I tend to get carried away when talking or writing about Shakespeare. I've read through the replies thus far and already know that some of my conclusions are going to clash with those of others. But, as Stuart Smalley would say, "That's...OK." “I love Shakespeare. He wrote some of the rawest stories, man. I mean look at Romeo and Juliet. That's some serious ghetto sh-t." - Tupac Titus / Julie Taymor (1999). Taymor (a name that will come up two more times in this list) makes a case for one of Shakespeare’s earliest and mort reviled plays. Taymor ups the visual interest to 11 while retaining much of the dialog. The cast is near perfect. Anthony Hopkins is the title character, Alan Cumming plays Saturninus as an entitled spoiled brat, and Harry Lennix chews some scenery marvelously as Aaron. But it is Jessica Lange who will chill you, thrill you and fulfill you as the evil Queen Tamora. Romeo And Juliet / Franco Zeffirelli (1968). This film had a profound influence on a generation and beyond. Not only did it turn on its generation to Shakespeare, it replaced “Julius Caesar” as the go-to play to teach in high school. As, now, a play of its time in the late ‘60s, schools dumped one of Shakespeare’s few plays with no sex to one with tons of sex. Romeo + Juliet / Baz Luhrman (1996). R&J for the next generation. This film startled and shook up some Shakespeare purists, but, for me, it is a real thriller and truly tragic (made even more so – and more cruel - by a slight tinkering with the final death scenes.) The Taming Of The Shrew / Franco Zeffirelli (1967). La Liz and Dickie (for the younger set, that's Elizabeth Taylor and her husband Richard Burton) in Shakespeare's anti-feminist romp (or is it subtly subversive of the patriarchal society of the Early Modern Period?). A Midsummer Night’s Dream / Peter Hall (1968). Excellent film of a RSC production with a top-flight cast. Helen Mirren, David Warner, Michael Jayston, and Diana Rigg as the four lovers from Athens, Ian Holm as Puck, Paul Rogers as Bottom, and best of all, Ian Richardson and Judi Dench as the sexiest King and Queen of the Fairies that you will ever find. Can’t miss. A Midsummer Night’s Dream / Julie Taymor (2014). This is a film of a production at the Theater for a New Audience in Brooklyn in 2013. It was shot with multiple cameras over four nights and then edited like a regular movie. Highly recommended, especially if unfamiliar with the play. A good time will be had by all. Due on DVD later in 2017. The Merchant Of Venice / Michael Radford. (2004). Al Pacino gets his chance at a full-length Shakespearean movie role and he nails it so completely that he may have ruined it for every other actor. “Merchant” is the Bard’s most controversial and disturbing play because of the portrayal of the Jewish money lender, Shylock (Pacino), in Venice. Much Ado About Nothing / Kenneth Branagh (1993) Much Ado About Nothing / Joss Whedon (2012)The world’s first rom-com and one of my favorite plays are given two top-notch film productions, just about 20 years apart. The 1993 “Much Ado” is on my Top 10 of the ‘90s. The Whedon film is a truly amazing work that gave me chills of horror when I first heard it announced, but came to looking forward to its release and left the theater walking on air. Amy Acker (Beatrice) is a true discovery. Nathan Fillion (Serenity, Castle), who had never acted Shakespeare before and was very doubtful about accepting the role, is impossibly funny as the vocabulary challenged constable. He is my personal Best Supporting Actor of 2012. Twelfth Night, or What You Will / Paul Kafno (1988). Although Kafno is credited as director of the television film, what is being performed is a stage production directed by Kenneth Branagh. Branagh makes more of a serious dramatic play from the materials than is usual. I have seen a couple of university stagings that were hilarious, but the Branagh’s actors find a more serious, perhaps melancholy, path Julius Caesar / Joseph L. Mankiewicz (1953). Mankiewicz had to shoot this on the cheap (using sets left over from “Quo Vadis”) to get the project approved. The biggest budget item were two British, James Mason and John Gielgud as Brutus and Cassius. In what some considered stunt casting, Marlon Brando in only his fourth film got the call as Marc Antony. Brando triumphs, proving once and for all that he could act in more than modern drama and that The Method was viable even in Shakespeare - and this has proved to be so to this day (see also Al Pacino, above). The Hollow Crown.
Richard II Henry IV parts 1 and 2 Henry V Henry VI parts 1, 2, and 3 Richard IIIThe BBC undertook a series of Shakespeare’s War Of The Roses historical chronicles and has turned in a major triumph on every front. “Richard II” stars Ben Whishaw as Richard, Rory Kinnear (The Imitation Game) as Richard’s usurper, David Suchet as York, and Patrick Stewart as John of Gaunt. Tom Hiddleston carries the next three plays as, first, as Prince Hal who cavorts at the Mermaid Tavern with Sir John Falstaff (Simon Russell Beale) but who converts into the heroic King Henry V. But Henry dies young, leaving an infant son as his heir. Henry VI grew to be a weak, easily led monarch who was unfit for rule. Many military battles and internal power struggles leaves the evil Richard of Gloucester as King. There is lots of location filming, wonderful natural acting, understandable spoken language, and many thrills and horrors. Capping the series is Benedict Cumberbatch’s definitive Richard. He is so great that I get goose bumps just thinking about it. One thing I learned from this production was how important Henry VI, part 3 is to Richard III. It is essential to Richard’s backstory. It explains who all these people at the beginning of “Richard III” are: why they are quarrelling, why they hate each other, and who that crazy woman is who roams the castle ranting curses at people. See them all. See them now. Hamlet / John Gielgud (1964) Hamlet / Gregory Doren (2009)In 1963 Richard Burton attacked the title role in a Broadway production directed by John Gielgud. This movie is a film of one of the actual nights with the sounds of the New York audience very much in evidence. Burton’s voice and portrayal are very muscular and masculine. The Gregory Doren film, starring David Tennant (the tenth Doctor on “Doctor Who”) and Patrick Stewart as King Claudius, is a film of a stage production that played to critical acclaim and sold-out houses during one summer at the Globe in Stratford. When the play moved to London’s West End in the Fall, the entire run of the play was booked between 6:00 am and lunchtime on the first day tickets were available. From the evidence of this film, the support was deserved. Nothing is done by rote. Every character, his/her motivation, thoughts and feelings have been carefully re-thought in light of modern psychology and acting styles. Tennant gives us a Hamlet for this time in history. Patrick Stewart is the best King Claudius I have ever seen. Period. Very, very highly recommended. King Lear / Edwin Sherin (1974). This was filmed live in front of an audience as part of Joseph Papp’s New York Shakespeare Festival at an outdoor theater in Central Park. James Earl Jones plays the title King and, as far as I am concerned, he is definitive until proven otherwise. His towering portrayal of Lear is of a commanding man who, because of slights and degradations both real and imagined that come from those closest to him, is reduced to a sad and impotent figure still trying to hold on to some majesty. Raul Julia makes a fine sarcastic villain in Edmund. Rosalind Cash plays the eldest evil daughter, Goneril, while Lee Chamberlin (most well known for her seasons paired with Morgan Freeman on “The Electric Company”) essays Cordelia. Paul Sorvino is Gloucester; Rene Auberjonois, Edgar. As in all productions I admire, there is truthfulness in acting (in a modern sense) and the text is respected. Wonderful. A Performance Of Macbeth / Philip Casson (1979). Ian McKellen steps up as the noble Thane who is tempted into murder. His performance stands with one foot in the older declamatory style but with another in modern style, especially in those moments of heightened tension. Roger Rees is a standout as Malcolm. Ian McDiarmid (Emperor Palpatine) doubles as a nobleman, Ross, and scores as the Porter in the famous comedy interruption that comes between the King’s murder and its discovery. Judi Dench, though, as Lady Macbeth is the true revelation of this production. It is magnificence, indeed. She digs into the character with all her ambiguities, forcefulness, doubts and guilt. The Tempest / Julie Taymor (2010). In switching protagonist’s gender from Prospero to Prosper a and getting Helen Mirren to play the part, Taymor came up with a great idea which works. One reason is that turning Prospera/Miranda into a mother/daughter relationship makes a lot of sense and fits the lines they are given to speak. Mirren is terrific as are fellow Brits Alfred Molina, Tom Conti, Alan Cumming, and Ben Whishaw. American actors David Strathairn and Chris Cooper comport themselves like experienced Shakespeareans, which they may very well be. This was my first encounter with Russell Brand. Speaking lines from “The Tempest” made him barely tolerable. This is a solid and very enjoyable version of the Jacobean masterwork. Speaking for myself, it doesn't tax my patience at all, Mike. (I tend to tax people's patience in discussing plot mechanics!) Excellent thoughts, many on movies I have yet to see! While I'm no fan of 2012 Much Ado, I adore the '93 version (one of my favorite movies of them all) and Zeffirelli's Romeo and Juliet. I also like Luhrman's version, albeit not as much as Zeffirelli's.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 24, 2017 15:14:18 GMT
spiderwortI'm not sure about The Merchant of Venice, but I know that doing Shakespeare in general was a passion project of his. Love his Looking for Richard.
|
|
|
|
Post by claudius on Apr 25, 2017 9:45:50 GMT
Patrick Stewart also played Claudius in the 1980 BBC CWoWS adaptation with Derek Jacobi as Claudius and David Robb as Leartes. Four years earlier, in the BBC Serial I, CLAUDIUS, Jacobi and Robb played brothers while Stewart fooled around with their sister. Many years later, Jacobi's Claudius (whose response to the I,C producers offer to play the title role was a matter of mistaken identity "I want to play Hamlet!") would murder Brian 'Augustus' Blessed's King Hamlet in the Kenneth Branagh version. There's some I,C connections in the many ANTONY AND CLEOPATRA adaptations: The Heston version had John 'Postumus' Castle as Octavian (his Cleo Hildegarde Neil is married to Blessed; it has been said Heston himself was an original contender to Graves' Roman Emperor). The Suzman version had Darien Angadi (a corrupted senator) plus a young Ben Kingsley (who at the time was married to Angela Morant, I, C's Octavia) and the BBC CWoWS version had John Paul's Canidias warning Antony of the superiority of Octavian's navy (he played the admiral of that Navy, Marcus Agrippa, in I,C).
|
|
|
|
Post by Salzmank on Apr 25, 2017 12:28:44 GMT
Titus / Julie Taymor (1999). Taymor (a name that will come up two more times in this list) makes a case for one of Shakespeare’s earliest and most reviled plays. Taymor ups the visual interest to 11 while retaining much of the dialog. The cast is near perfect. Anthony Hopkins is the title character, Alan Cumming plays Saturninus as an entitled spoiled brat, and Harry Lennix chews some scenery marvelously as Aaron. But it is Jessica Lange who will chill you, thrill you and fulfill you as the evil Queen Tamora. A Midsummer Night’s Dream / Julie Taymor (2014). This is a film of a production at the Theater for a New Audience in Brooklyn in 2013. It was shot with multiple cameras over four nights and then edited like a regular movie. Highly recommended, especially if unfamiliar with the play. A good time will be had by all. Due on DVD later in 2017. The Tempest / Julie Taymor (2010). In switching protagonist’s gender from Prospero to Prosper a and getting Helen Mirren to play the part, Taymor came up with a great idea which works. One reason is that turning Prospera/Miranda into a mother/daughter relationship makes a lot of sense and fits the lines they are given to speak. Mirren is terrific as are fellow Brits Alfred Molina, Tom Conti, Alan Cumming, and Ben Whishaw. American actors David Strathairn and Chris Cooper comport themselves like experienced Shakespeareans, which they may very well be. This was my first encounter with Russell Brand. Speaking lines from “The Tempest” made him barely tolerable. This is a solid and very enjoyable version of the Jacobean masterwork. Mike, I've been looking up Julie Taymor's Shakespearean adaptations. (I knew I'd heard her name before, but unfortunately I've not yet seen any of her movies.) My thanks for the recommendations! Titus looks particularly intriguing.
|
|