|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 11, 2020 23:23:11 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by weststigersbob on Feb 12, 2020 6:04:18 GMT
Rams Rams Rams ?
Sounds like a football bestiality ‘rule 34’ porno.......
|
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Feb 12, 2020 7:09:18 GMT
Flyers, Flyers, Flyers. Dayton is good. Two points away from being undefeated. Lost in OT to Kansas and Colorado. Can they get a #1 seed? No real big wins, URI was their highest ranked victory and they have to play them again
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 7:13:19 GMT
Rams Rams Rams ? Sounds like a football bestiality ‘rule 34’ porno....... Hey, man. It's 2020; if you want a brawny footballer to put in your culo, go out and get one. No need to stay shut-in with your keypad, dirtying up my Sports thread which is clearly emblazoned with an easily identifiable team logo. Good luck dick hunting.
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 8:25:30 GMT
Flyers, Flyers, Flyers. Dayton is good. Two points away from being undefeated. Lost in OT to Kansas and Colorado. Can they get a #1 seed? No real big wins, URI was their highest ranked victory and they have to play them again Meh, the thing is, remember Semi Ojeleye? Yeah, me neither, I had to Google "duke smu transfer" to get his name. See, at Duke he played like never, and averaged 2 or 3 points in his total of less than 10 games in 2(or 3?) seasons. So then he transferred to SMU (I know - I gave away the twist too soon) and was their star player, and more importantly the AAC's (NOT acc) like Player of For All Time, Ever. And, at one point that season (2016-2017), SMU's W-L record was so good, it was like Should they top the rankings? Is it elitist to insist a team be in one of the major conferences to break the top 5? and it's like No, it's not elitist, it's logical. You have to factor in context. So SMU went on to bounce out of the Tourney in the first round. No offense to Dayton or SDSU fans, or even to Gonzaga fans, but they play no one. NO one. If Sierra Canyon played any one of those teams tomorrow, who would win? I'm betting that Sierra Canyon, 15 year-olds and all, has defense that's at least twice as solid as any team Gonzaga, SDSU or Dayton has played all season. I've watched those teams; the only thing stopping them from scoring 180 points every game is the inaccuracy of their own offense. They may as well be running up and down empty courts, playing the clock. It could be a new league: Uncontested Shots (that still often miss) USA. There's a reason not one of Gonzaga, BYU, SDSU, USC or Oregon have ever been National Champs, and not even UCLA or Arizona have been Champs in this millennium. You can be great in a vacuum, but could you even beat a half-losing team in the ACC, Big 12 or Big East? Beyond that, there's a further hierarchy; Kansas (Big 12) is number 3 in the country, but they couldn't beat current number 7 Duke (ACC) on a neutral court (MSG) when given the chance. There's basketball country and then there's not. So honestly, I don't care if Dayton gets a #1 seed, as long as Duke gets to be in their region.
|
|
|
|
Post by weststigersbob on Feb 12, 2020 9:13:29 GMT
Rams Rams Rams ? Sounds like a football bestiality ‘rule 34’ porno....... Hey, man. It's 2020; if you want a brawny footballer to put in your culo, go out and get one. No need to stay shut-in with your keypad, dirtying up my Sports thread which is clearly emblazoned with an easily identifiable team logo. Good luck dick hunting. Someone doth protest too much..... As for “easily identifiable”, thats bullshit - because I didn’t identify it.... |
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 9:17:09 GMT
Hey, man. It's 2020; if you want a brawny footballer to put in your culo, go out and get one. No need to stay shut-in with your keypad, dirtying up my Sports thread which is clearly emblazoned with an easily identifiable team logo. Good luck dick hunting. Someone doth protest too much..... As for “easily identifiable”, thats bullshit - because I didn’t identify it.... Good lord, computer much? Just right-click onto the image and... you know what, ignorance is bliss and I wish you the most. And no, I don't protest at all; I love penis. Are you blind? How do you not fall down more?
|
|
|
|
Post by spoonyrumble on Feb 12, 2020 9:20:42 GMT
Someone doth protest too much..... As for “easily identifiable”, thats bullshit - because I didn’t identify it.... Good lord, computer much? Just right-click onto the image and... you know what, ignorance is bliss and I wish you the most. And no, I don't protest at all; I love penis. Are you blind? How do you not fall down more? Who are you? lol
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 9:27:19 GMT
Good lord, computer much? Just right-click onto the image and... you know what, ignorance is bliss and I wish you the most. And no, I don't protest at all; I love penis. Are you blind? How do you not fall down more? Who are you? lol
|
|
|
|
Post by spoonyrumble on Feb 12, 2020 9:29:37 GMT
'' The page you requested is not available in your country, you British fuck '' =[
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 9:32:37 GMT
'' The page you requested is not available in your country, you British fuck '' =[ Aww, I'll have to start making YouTube videos to reply like you did that time when you called Flying Monkeys old for naming himself after The Wizard of Oz.  I'm not your bicycle girl, but I'll have to due.
|
|
|
|
Post by spoonyrumble on Feb 12, 2020 9:35:00 GMT
'' The page you requested is not available in your country, you British fuck '' =[ Aww, I'll have to start making YouTube videos to reply like you did that time when you called Flying Monkeys old for naming himself after The Wizard of Oz. I'm not your bicycle girl, but I'll have to due. You cant prove I did that. And whos ass/torso is that in your avatar? =] You know i like a good ass n torso x
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 9:37:26 GMT
Aww, I'll have to start making YouTube videos to reply like you did that time when you called Flying Monkeys old for naming himself after The Wizard of Oz. I'm not your bicycle girl, but I'll have to due. You cant prove I did that. And whos ass/torso is that in your avatar? =] You know i like a good ass n torso x Mine! I thought you'd seen it and knew, and that's why you wrote me saying you miss me on f|b, not that you aren't deep enough to miss me for me, you pos. =)
|
|
|
|
Post by spoonyrumble on Feb 12, 2020 9:45:55 GMT
You cant prove I did that. And whos ass/torso is that in your avatar? =] You know i like a good ass n torso x Mine! I thought you'd seen it and knew, and that's why you wrote me saying you miss me on f|b, not that you aren't deep enough to miss me for me, you pos. =) No, this is the 1st time i have ever seen your ass or torso, and certainly the first time i have ever seen them together in the same room =]
|
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Feb 12, 2020 17:36:28 GMT
Flyers, Flyers, Flyers. Dayton is good. Two points away from being undefeated. Lost in OT to Kansas and Colorado. Can they get a #1 seed? No real big wins, URI was their highest ranked victory and they have to play them again Meh, the thing is, remember Semi Ojeleye? Yeah, me neither, I had to Google "duke smu transfer" to get his name. See, at Duke he played like never, and averaged 2 or 3 points in his total of less than 10 games in 2(or 3?) seasons. So then he transferred to SMU (I know - I gave away the twist too soon) and was their star player, and more importantly the AAC's (NOT acc) like Player of For All Time, Ever. And, at one point that season (2016-2017), SMU's W-L record was so good, it was like Should they top the rankings? Is it elitist to insist a team be in one of the major conferences to break the top 5? and it's like No, it's not elitist, it's logical. You have to factor in context. So SMU went on to bounce out of the Tourney in the first round. No offense to Dayton or SDSU fans, or even to Gonzaga fans, but they play no one. NO one. If Sierra Canyon played any one of those teams tomorrow, who would win? I'm betting that Sierra Canyon, 15 year-olds and all, has defense that's at least twice as solid as any team Gonzaga, SDSU or Dayton has played all season. I've watched those teams; the only thing stopping them from scoring 180 points every game is the inaccuracy of their own offense. They may as well be running up and down empty courts, playing the clock. It could be a new league: Uncontested Shots (that still often miss) USA. There's a reason not one of Gonzaga, BYU, SDSU, USC or Oregon have ever been National Champs, and not even UCLA or Arizona have been Champs in this millennium. You can be great in a vacuum, but could you even beat a half-losing team in the ACC, Big 12 or Big East? Beyond that, there's a further hierarchy; Kansas (Big 12) is number 3 in the country, but they couldn't beat current number 7 Duke (ACC) on a neutral court (MSG) when given the chance. There's basketball country and then there's not. So honestly, I don't care if Dayton gets a #1 seed, as long as Duke gets to be in their region. Ignoring the rest of the "stuff" on this thread...
You don;t remember Semi "Colon" Ojeleye? He was a good bench player on a national Championship team. I don't remember why he transferred. I thought he would have played the next season. He was basically the same player as Justice Winslow.
My post said that I don't think Dayton will get a #1 seed. Gonzaga will get a #1 seed, they played a good non conference. San Diego State will get a #1 if they win out. The Committee will give an undefeated a #1, unless its an Ive League or similar. And nearly ever ranking had SDAU ranked high. kenpom has them at #4, Sagarin at #7, the NCAA NET, well, they're #1.
I'm all for tougher scheduling but not everyone can play in the ACC (and the ACC is nothing to brag about this year). The Gonzaga's, the Dayton's, the SDSU's of the CBB world play their schedules in their conferences. Do I think a one loss Horizon Conference team that plays a weak non conference should get a #1 or #2, no. Do I think they should get a #15, no. And playing a weak conference doesn't help in March. Ask 2014-15 Kentucky
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 17:56:48 GMT
Meh, the thing is, remember Semi Ojeleye? Yeah, me neither, I had to Google "duke smu transfer" to get his name. See, at Duke he played like never, and averaged 2 or 3 points in his total of less than 10 games in 2(or 3?) seasons. So then he transferred to SMU (I know - I gave away the twist too soon) and was their star player, and more importantly the AAC's (NOT acc) like Player of For All Time, Ever. And, at one point that season (2016-2017), SMU's W-L record was so good, it was like Should they top the rankings? Is it elitist to insist a team be in one of the major conferences to break the top 5? and it's like No, it's not elitist, it's logical. You have to factor in context. So SMU went on to bounce out of the Tourney in the first round. No offense to Dayton or SDSU fans, or even to Gonzaga fans, but they play no one. NO one. If Sierra Canyon played any one of those teams tomorrow, who would win? I'm betting that Sierra Canyon, 15 year-olds and all, has defense that's at least twice as solid as any team Gonzaga, SDSU or Dayton has played all season. I've watched those teams; the only thing stopping them from scoring 180 points every game is the inaccuracy of their own offense. They may as well be running up and down empty courts, playing the clock. It could be a new league: Uncontested Shots (that still often miss) USA. There's a reason not one of Gonzaga, BYU, SDSU, USC or Oregon have ever been National Champs, and not even UCLA or Arizona have been Champs in this millennium. You can be great in a vacuum, but could you even beat a half-losing team in the ACC, Big 12 or Big East? Beyond that, there's a further hierarchy; Kansas (Big 12) is number 3 in the country, but they couldn't beat current number 7 Duke (ACC) on a neutral court (MSG) when given the chance. There's basketball country and then there's not. So honestly, I don't care if Dayton gets a #1 seed, as long as Duke gets to be in their region. Ignoring the rest of the "stuff" on this thread... You don;t remember Semi "Colon" Ojeleye? He was a good bench player on a national Championship team. I don't remember why he transferred. I thought he would have played the next season. He was basically the same player as Justice Winslow.
My post said that I don't think Dayton will get a #1 seed. Gonzaga will get a #1 seed, they played a good non conference. San Diego State will get a #1 if they win out. The Committee will give an undefeated a #1, unless its an Ive League or similar. And nearly ever ranking had SDAU ranked high. kenpom has them at #4, Sagarin at #7, the NCAA NET, well, they're #1.
I'm all for tougher scheduling but not everyone can play in the ACC (and the ACC is nothing to brag about this year). The Gonzaga's, the Dayton's, the SDSU's of the CBB world play their schedules in their conferences. Do I think a one loss Horizon Conference team that plays a weak non conference should get a #1 or #2, no. Do I think they should get a #15, no. And playing a weak conference doesn't help in March. Ask 2014-15 Kentucky I remembered him and the transfer, but not his name without looking it up, not at all. Yeah, SMU got a #6; that seemed fair enough. But should all those platforms have them that high? Yeah, their conferences blow, but what about their non-conference schedules? Gonzaga? The only two decent teams they played were equally perennially untested Oregon who they edged by only one point *at home* and Michigan who has truly been the Emperor who had no clothes and Michigan deSTROYED Gonzaga, at Gonzaga. I mean, before I move on to SDSU, school me, splain me; tell me how I'm wrong. Coach K? What does he set up for non-conference, year after year? How much credit do Duke players get for the behemoth of a schedule they tackle? Can we not get real about it? It's old, man. I'm over it.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Feb 12, 2020 18:15:33 GMT
Ignoring the rest of the "stuff" on this thread... You don;t remember Semi "Colon" Ojeleye? He was a good bench player on a national Championship team. I don't remember why he transferred. I thought he would have played the next season. He was basically the same player as Justice Winslow.
My post said that I don't think Dayton will get a #1 seed. Gonzaga will get a #1 seed, they played a good non conference. San Diego State will get a #1 if they win out. The Committee will give an undefeated a #1, unless its an Ive League or similar. And nearly ever ranking had SDAU ranked high. kenpom has them at #4, Sagarin at #7, the NCAA NET, well, they're #1.
I'm all for tougher scheduling but not everyone can play in the ACC (and the ACC is nothing to brag about this year). The Gonzaga's, the Dayton's, the SDSU's of the CBB world play their schedules in their conferences. Do I think a one loss Horizon Conference team that plays a weak non conference should get a #1 or #2, no. Do I think they should get a #15, no. And playing a weak conference doesn't help in March. Ask 2014-15 Kentucky I remembered him and the transfer, but not his name without looking it up, not at all. Yeah, SMU got a #6; that seemed fair enough. But should all those platforms have them that high? Yeah, their conferences blow, but what about their non-conference schedules? Gonzaga? The only two decent teams they played were equally perennially untested Oregon who they edged by only one point *at home* and Michigan who has truly been the Emperor who had no clothes and Michigan deSTROYED Gonzaga, at Gonzaga. I mean, before I move on to SDSU, school me, splain me; tell me how I'm wrong. Coach K? What does he set up for non-conference, year after year? How much credit do Duke players get for the behemoth of a schedule they tackle? Can we not get real about it? It's old, man. I'm over it. Gonzaga also scheduled UNC. Not their fault that the Tar Heels suck (snicker).
SDSU, again, the NCAA will give a #1 to a mid major with a "0" in the loss column. They did it with Wichita State in 2014. And the NCAA bases a lot of the tournament selection, right or wrong, on the NET rankings. Where SDSU is #1.
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 18:20:06 GMT
I remembered him and the transfer, but not his name without looking it up, not at all. Yeah, SMU got a #6; that seemed fair enough. But should all those platforms have them that high? Yeah, their conferences blow, but what about their non-conference schedules? Gonzaga? The only two decent teams they played were equally perennially untested Oregon who they edged by only one point *at home* and Michigan who has truly been the Emperor who had no clothes and Michigan deSTROYED Gonzaga, at Gonzaga. I mean, before I move on to SDSU, school me, splain me; tell me how I'm wrong. Coach K? What does he set up for non-conference, year after year? How much credit do Duke players get for the behemoth of a schedule they tackle? Can we not get real about it? It's old, man. I'm over it. Gonzaga also scheduled UNC. Not their fault that the Tar Heels suck (snicker).
SDSU, again, the NCAA will give a #1 to a mid major with a "0" in the loss column. They did it with Wichita State in 2014. And the NCAA bases a lot of the tournament selection, right or wrong, on the NET rankings. Where SDSU is #1. Oh my gosh, what happened to Roy Williams? Was he pranked by fake recruiting stats? Is he going through the male change of life (is that a sexagenarian thing?)? Did he pin an entire team's season on Cole Anthony, only?
|
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Feb 12, 2020 18:56:49 GMT
Gonzaga also scheduled UNC. Not their fault that the Tar Heels suck (snicker).
SDSU, again, the NCAA will give a #1 to a mid major with a "0" in the loss column. They did it with Wichita State in 2014. And the NCAA bases a lot of the tournament selection, right or wrong, on the NET rankings. Where SDSU is #1. Oh my gosh, what happened to Roy Williams? Was he pranked by fake recruiting stats? Is he going through the male change of life (is that a sexagenarian thing?)? Did he pin an entire team's season on Cole Anthony, only? They lost a lot form last year and brought in an underachieving recruiting class. The only freshman worth a damn is Cole Anthony and his injury wrecked the team. And Roy sayinf over and over that the Heels sucked in the media didn't help. It's a hiccup. In 2009-10, Carolina was 20-17 and missed the NCAA. The next year, they were Elite 8. But Huckleberry Hound hasn't exactly lit up the tournament since the Championship. Maybe that will hurt recruiting, but I doubt it. He's no Matt Doherty
|
|
|
|
Post by dianachristensen on Feb 12, 2020 20:38:12 GMT
Oh my gosh, what happened to Roy Williams? Was he pranked by fake recruiting stats? Is he going through the male change of life (is that a sexagenarian thing?)? Did he pin an entire team's season on Cole Anthony, only? They lost a lot form last year and brought in an underachieving recruiting class. The only freshman worth a damn is Cole Anthony and his injury wrecked the team. And Roy sayinf over and over that the Heels sucked in the media didn't help. It's a hiccup. In 2009-10, Carolina was 20-17 and missed the NCAA. The next year, they were Elite 8. But Huckleberry Hound hasn't exactly lit up the tournament since the Championship. Maybe that will hurt recruiting, but I doubt it. He's no Matt Doherty Exactly about Cole Anthony and Williams, lol, Huckleberry Hound; he's been such a mess in the press. It's like, actually resign and REALLY screw those kids over, or shut up and try to coach them please, now. Speaking of not lighting it up, of how much value is he really? I Googled "roy williams doesn't call timeout". The 1st page results, from 2016 to this past November, are basically a collection of varying viewpoints that add up to a balanced assessment, from Seth Greenberg defending Williams' non-use of timeouts on Mike & Mike in 2016, to SI more objectively discussing his awkward deal on that as one of many strange aspects to a strange start this season: www.si.com/college/unc/basketball/early-timeout-strange-momentI don't know, maybe I have it all wrong, but I feel like (coaching-wise not recruiting-wise) these kids are just clay, and if you have a Bill Self (ichhh - I don't enjoy admitting that) in place of a Roy Williams, with the same kids, you have Carolina in the top 5 and Kansas unranked, you know, if coaches were swapped. Then you've got a Coach Cal who's half checked out, and I can't blame him (ichhh again) because full-time one-and-doneing it has to come with massive burnout. I hate one and done. Interestingly, Coach K shone, was shining, did shine (lol) at Syracuse when Nolan Smith was out b/c his baby daughter was sick and Jon Scheyer had to get an emergency appendectomy at a hospital in Syracuse, game day. He was his next level Coach K self, standing the whole time, not so much yelling but not gritting his teeth on the bench for a minute. I don't know, maybe it would kill him to do that every game, or at least kill his back. I just hope Tre Jones stays for two more, same goes for whoever is not obvious NBA bait. One and done needs to be over; let the kids who want to and can go straight into the NBA like Kobe and LeBron. Does SDSU have upperclassmen, like good ones who stayed, to stay and play? I envy that. This is why I can't remember a bench rider's name from a few years ago, so many names and numbers, always changing. Quinn Cook, 2. Bobby Hurley, 11. Grant Hill, 33. Laettner, 32. Tony Lang, 21. Cherokee Parks, 44. JJ Redick, 4. If Tre Jones leaves this year, I probably won't even remember he was number 3, Basketballzheimer's 
|
|
