|
Post by WarrenPeace on Mar 18, 2020 3:44:07 GMT
And what will they say if the Saints, Falcons and Panthers have winning records, and the Buccaneers don't? The Bucs were 7-9 without Brady. In the week 1 loss, Winston threw a pick 6 with 2:06 left in the game, down by 6. History tells us that Brady wins that game. In the week 3 loss, Winston threw a 4th quarter interception and the offense had a delay of fucking game after a spiked ball play! Brady wins that game. In the week 5 loss, Tampa had 6 drives of 5 plays or less that led to a punt. Brady probably wins that game. In the week 6 loss, Winston had 5 interceptions and a sack fumble. Brady wins that game. In the week 7 loss, Winston had a sack fumble in the 4th and threw an interception with 26 seconds left down by 4. (He threw 2ints and had 2 fumbles the entire game.) Brady probably wins that game. In the week 11 loss, Winston had 4 interceptions, one that gave the ball to Brees at the Tampa 16. Brady wins that game. In the week 16 loss, Winston had 4 ints, including a pick-6, a pick 6 called back due to an illegal block, and one down by 3 in the 4th with 1:31 remaining. Brady wins this game. In the week 17 loss, Winston threw 2 interceptions, including a pick-6 on the first play of overtime. Brady. Wins. This. Game. That's 7 of 9 losses that Brady definitely wins, and 1 that he probably wins. Just by not turning the ball over 40 times. Course he wins them all. The refs didn't bother checking the PSI of the footballs.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 18, 2020 4:12:07 GMT
And what will they say if the Saints, Falcons and Panthers have winning records, and the Buccaneers don't? The Bucs were 7-9 without Brady. In the week 1 loss, Winston threw a pick 6 with 2:06 left in the game, down by 6. History tells us that Brady wins that game. In the week 3 loss, Winston threw a 4th quarter interception and the offense had a delay of fucking game after a spiked ball play! Brady wins that game. In the week 5 loss, Tampa had 6 drives of 5 plays or less that led to a punt. Brady probably wins that game. In the week 6 loss, Winston had 5 interceptions and a sack fumble. Brady wins that game. In the week 7 loss, Winston had a sack fumble in the 4th and threw an interception with 26 seconds left down by 4. (He threw 2ints and had 2 fumbles the entire game.) Brady probably wins that game. In the week 11 loss, Winston had 4 interceptions, one that gave the ball to Brees at the Tampa 16. Brady wins that game. In the week 16 loss, Winston had 4 ints, including a pick-6, a pick 6 called back due to an illegal block, and one down by 3 in the 4th with 1:31 remaining. Brady wins this game. In the week 17 loss, Winston threw 2 interceptions, including a pick-6 on the first play of overtime. Brady. Wins. This. Game. That's 7 of 9 losses that Brady definitely wins, and 1 that he probably wins. Just by not turning the ball over 40 times. I never said Brady wasn't any good. I just said the Patriots have benefited annually from a weak division.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Mar 18, 2020 6:58:24 GMT
The Bucs were 7-9 without Brady. In the week 1 loss, Winston threw a pick 6 with 2:06 left in the game, down by 6. History tells us that Brady wins that game. In the week 3 loss, Winston threw a 4th quarter interception and the offense had a delay of fucking game after a spiked ball play! Brady wins that game. In the week 5 loss, Tampa had 6 drives of 5 plays or less that led to a punt. Brady probably wins that game. In the week 6 loss, Winston had 5 interceptions and a sack fumble. Brady wins that game. In the week 7 loss, Winston had a sack fumble in the 4th and threw an interception with 26 seconds left down by 4. (He threw 2ints and had 2 fumbles the entire game.) Brady probably wins that game. In the week 11 loss, Winston had 4 interceptions, one that gave the ball to Brees at the Tampa 16. Brady wins that game. In the week 16 loss, Winston had 4 ints, including a pick-6, a pick 6 called back due to an illegal block, and one down by 3 in the 4th with 1:31 remaining. Brady wins this game. In the week 17 loss, Winston threw 2 interceptions, including a pick-6 on the first play of overtime. Brady. Wins. This. Game. That's 7 of 9 losses that Brady definitely wins, and 1 that he probably wins. Just by not turning the ball over 40 times. I never said Brady wasn't any good. I just said the Patriots have benefited annually from a weak division. And now he's in a division with a backup QB, a 41 year old quarterback, and a QB who had 1 good year. To the Brady hatters, the NFC South will be considered the weakest division in the 2020 season. Just you wait and see.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 18, 2020 7:10:46 GMT
I never said Brady wasn't any good. I just said the Patriots have benefited annually from a weak division. And now he's in a division with a backup QB, a 41 year old quarterback, and a QB who had 1 good year. To the Brady hatters, the NFC South will be considered the weakest division in the 2020 season. Just you wait and see. Oh yeah. Weaker than the AFC East? What kinda quarterbacks do they have in that division?
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Mar 18, 2020 7:17:19 GMT
And now he's in a division with a backup QB, a 41 year old quarterback, and a QB who had 1 good year. To the Brady hatters, the NFC South will be considered the weakest division in the 2020 season. Just you wait and see. Oh yeah. Weaker than the AFC East? What kinda quarterbacks do they have in that division? That will not even be a topic of interest in 10 months. But there will be rumblings of how Brady wanted to get out of the AFC East. Mark my words. The NFC South will be claimed the easiest division by all the Brady hatters next January.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 18, 2020 7:42:07 GMT
Oh yeah. Weaker than the AFC East? What kinda quarterbacks do they have in that division? That will not even be a topic of interest in 10 months. But there will be rumblings of how Brady wanted to get out of the AFC East. Mark my words. The NFC South will be claimed the easiest division by all the Brady hatters next January. Ha ha ha . . . Dream on Brady lover . . . Ha ha ha . . .
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Mar 18, 2020 7:58:15 GMT
That will not even be a topic of interest in 10 months. But there will be rumblings of how Brady wanted to get out of the AFC East. Mark my words. The NFC South will be claimed the easiest division by all the Brady hatters next January. Ha ha ha . . . Dream on Brady lover . . . Ha ha ha . . . I'm usually proven right. Time will tell.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 18, 2020 8:10:45 GMT
Ha ha ha . . . Dream on Brady lover . . . Ha ha ha . . . I'm usually proven right. Time will tell. I'll tell you what's going to happen. Brady's gonna see the NFC South ain't the AFC East. He'll fake an injury in training camp. Sit out the whole year. And retire in the off season.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Mar 18, 2020 8:16:10 GMT
I'm usually proven right. Time will tell. I'll tell you what's going to happen. Brady's gonna see the NFC South ain't the AFC East. He'll fake an injury in training camp. Sit out the whole year. And retire in the off season. That's a clown prediction, bra. No way you even believe it. Even less likely to happen then the crazy conspiracy theories I've been hearing.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Mar 18, 2020 9:57:54 GMT
Dec 9, 2019 at 11:51am hehatesshe said: "Denver, Tennessee, Chicago, Las Vegas, and New Orleans would all take Brady. All would have a better record next year with him. Scary version we haven't considered: Brady views a lot more teams than we do as being 'just a QB away.' Or he just wants to prove he still 'has it' and signs a bloated contract with an average team with a few weapons just so he can put up gaudy numbers one more time. Tampa Bay fits that bill. Possibly a couple more " Okay, I count eight total guesses there, that's one quarter of the league. Obvious liable is obvious!!! You forgot "But that one clearly stands out as both Winston and Fitzmagic have had amazing, and amazingly inconsistent, number with those weapons" and "Is the world ready for an NFL division that has Tom Brady, Drew Brees, Matt Ryan, and whoever the Panthers might have (Cam Newton?)" All said 2 months before the season ended. Find me someone who said anything similar any earlier. It's fascinating how many people NOW realize what a great fit it is for Brady...
|
|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Mar 18, 2020 14:41:27 GMT
Trae Waynes going to the Bengals is a huge loss for the Vikings. Really, really huge. Despite what the talking heads here want you to believe. They keep talking about how he was okay but never great. Yeah well cornerback is a hard ass position to play and he played hard. He always gave 100%. And he was good far more than not. This is a legit loss and one that we'll feel every week.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 18, 2020 15:50:15 GMT
I never said Brady wasn't any good. I just said the Patriots have benefited annually from a weak division. And I thoroughly destroyed that argument last season. It's more generic commentary easily proven false when you examine the numbers. The Patriots benefit from being consistently better than the entire league. Or at least they did, who knows what the future will bring? The Saints also have an all time great QB, play in a dome, yet for some reason can't seem to win home playoff games; let alone more than one title. Since Brees came to the Saints in 2006, they have eight winning seasons, an 8-8 campaign and five losing seasons. In the same span, the Panthers have had four winning seasons, two .500 seasons and seven losing seasons. The Falcons are similarly up and down, with seven winning seasons in that span, six losing seasons and an 8-8 campaign. The Bucs haven't made the playoffs since 2007. So in Brees tenure, everybody else in the division has had at least an equal amount of non-winning seasons as they have winning seasons. There's no juggernaut here, the division isn't difficult. It's only difficult for any one team to stay on top due to their own inconsistency. The numbers bear it out. Do you see where I'm going here? The difference between the AFC East and the NFC South isn't the amount of losing seasons by the other teams in the division; the AFC East has bad teams too. The point is the Patriots never had a losing record, or even a .500 record, during Brady's tenure. Even though the Jets (that's right, the Jets) went to back-to-back AFC championship games in that span. I'll let you tell me the last NFC South team to make back-to-back conference championship games. Nah, I'll save you the research. It's never happened. Add this to my previous post (scroll down a little) that demolished the idea that the Patriots 'benefit from a weak division.' They benefitted from preparation, focus and of course having the GOAT at QB. The Saints and the rest of their division stumble around like the rest of the NFL, not just the AFC East, just hoping to make the playoffs. A team with Brady had the pressure of trying to win the Super Bowl every single year. He made it to that game literally half of his career as a starter in New England, and won it six times. If only Brees and the Saints could get out of their own way on a regular basis (really, if any team in your division could do it) you'd actually have an argument regarding weak divisions here. The truth is the Saints and the rest of their division operate exactly as the NFL wants them to. Up one year, down the next, everyone gets a chance to be excited for a little while. As I've previously stated, the anomaly was the Patriots. You're just not supposed to win the way they did in today's NFL. It was fun to experience, maybe if for no other reason than I didn't have to invent excuses for some other team's success.
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Mar 18, 2020 15:57:41 GMT
I never said Brady wasn't any good. I just said the Patriots have benefited annually from a weak division. And I thoroughly destroyed that argument last season. It's more generic commentary easily proven false when you examine the numbers. The Patriots benefit from being consistently better than the entire league. Or at least they did, who knows what the future will bring? The Saints also have an all time great QB, play in a dome, yet for some reason can't seem to win home playoff games; let alone more than one title. Since Brees came to the Saints in 2006, they have eight winning seasons, an 8-8 campaign and five losing seasons. In the same span, the Panthers have had four winning seasons, two .500 seasons and seven losing seasons. The Falcons are similarly up and down, with seven winning seasons in that span, six losing seasons and an 8-8 campaign. The Bucs haven't made the playoffs since 2007. So in Brees tenure, everybody else in the division has had at least an equal amount of non-winning seasons as they have winning seasons. There's no juggernaut here, the division isn't difficult. It's only difficult for any one team to stay on top due to their own inconsistency. The numbers bear it out. Do you see where I'm going here? The difference between the AFC East and the NFC South isn't the amount of losing seasons by the other teams in the division; the AFC East has bad teams too. The point is the Patriots never had a losing record, or even a .500 record, during Brady's tenure. Even though the Jets (that's right, the Jets) went to back-to-back AFC championship games in that span. I'll let you tell me the last NFC South team to make back-to-back conference championship games. Nah, I'll save you the research. It's never happened. Add this to my previous post (scroll down a little) that demolished the idea that the Patriots 'benefit from a weak division.' They benefitted from preparation, focus and of course having the GOAT at QB. The Saints and the rest of their division stumble around like the rest of the NFL, not just the AFC East, just hoping to make the playoffs. A team with Brady had the pressure of trying to win the Super Bowl every single year. He made it to that game literally half of his career as a starter in New England, and won it six times. If only Brees and the Saints could get out of their own way on a regular basis (really, if any team in your division could do it) you'd actually have an argument regarding weak divisions here. The truth is the Saints and the rest of their division operate exactly as the NFL wants them to. Up one year, down the next, everyone gets a chance to be excited for a little while. As I've previously stated, the anomaly was the Patriots. You're just not supposed to win the way they did in today's NFL. It was fun to experience, maybe if for no other reason than I didn't have to invent excuses for some other team's success. Nope. You are supporting what I have been saying. The reason the Saints, Panthers and Falcons all take turns winning the division is their all good clubs. Unlike what's been the case in the AFC East. And even the Buccaneers, arguably the worse team in the NFC South, have been better than the Bills, Jets and Dolphins on average. --------- It's about to get real for Tom Brady. Ha ha ha . . . I can hear it now --- "Yeah but he's old. He was younger when he was playing in the AFC East." Ha ha ha . . .
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 18, 2020 16:34:44 GMT
And I thoroughly destroyed that argument last season. It's more generic commentary easily proven false when you examine the numbers. The Patriots benefit from being consistently better than the entire league. Or at least they did, who knows what the future will bring? The Saints also have an all time great QB, play in a dome, yet for some reason can't seem to win home playoff games; let alone more than one title. Since Brees came to the Saints in 2006, they have eight winning seasons, an 8-8 campaign and five losing seasons. In the same span, the Panthers have had four winning seasons, two .500 seasons and seven losing seasons. The Falcons are similarly up and down, with seven winning seasons in that span, six losing seasons and an 8-8 campaign. The Bucs haven't made the playoffs since 2007. So in Brees tenure, everybody else in the division has had at least an equal amount of non-winning seasons as they have winning seasons. There's no juggernaut here, the division isn't difficult. It's only difficult for any one team to stay on top due to their own inconsistency. The numbers bear it out. Do you see where I'm going here? The difference between the AFC East and the NFC South isn't the amount of losing seasons by the other teams in the division; the AFC East has bad teams too. The point is the Patriots never had a losing record, or even a .500 record, during Brady's tenure. Even though the Jets (that's right, the Jets) went to back-to-back AFC championship games in that span. I'll let you tell me the last NFC South team to make back-to-back conference championship games. Nah, I'll save you the research. It's never happened. Add this to my previous post (scroll down a little) that demolished the idea that the Patriots 'benefit from a weak division.' They benefitted from preparation, focus and of course having the GOAT at QB. The Saints and the rest of their division stumble around like the rest of the NFL, not just the AFC East, just hoping to make the playoffs. A team with Brady had the pressure of trying to win the Super Bowl every single year. He made it to that game literally half of his career as a starter in New England, and won it six times. If only Brees and the Saints could get out of their own way on a regular basis (really, if any team in your division could do it) you'd actually have an argument regarding weak divisions here. The truth is the Saints and the rest of their division operate exactly as the NFL wants them to. Up one year, down the next, everyone gets a chance to be excited for a little while. As I've previously stated, the anomaly was the Patriots. You're just not supposed to win the way they did in today's NFL. It was fun to experience, maybe if for no other reason than I didn't have to invent excuses for some other team's success. Nope. You are supporting what I have been saying. The reason the Saints, Panthers and Falcons all take turns winning the division is their all good clubs. Unlike what's been the case in the AFC East. And even the Buccaneers, arguably the worse team in the NFC South, have been better than the Bills, Jets and Dolphins on average. Five, six, and seven losing seasons out of 14 are good clubs? A team that hasn't made the playoffs since 2007? It proves they're all mediocre. Even the Jets went to back-to-back conference championship games. That makes two teams in the AFC East to do that in the last 10 years. No team in your division has ever done that. "It's about to get real for Brady now that he's playing the NFC South." Ha ha ha... Brady's record vs the NFC South: 17-4 4-1 vs. The Saints 6-0 vs. Falcons (Including a Super Bowl win) 3-3 vs. Panthers (Including a Super Bowl win) 4-0 vs. Buccaneers He should be afraid. Brady is playing with house money at this point, people already said he went off the cliff last year. You better hope that's true.
|
|
|
Post by FrankSobotka1514 on Mar 18, 2020 16:39:04 GMT
Nope. You are supporting what I have been saying. The reason the Saints, Panthers and Falcons all take turns winning the division is their all good clubs. Unlike what's been the case in the AFC East. And even the Buccaneers, arguably the worse team in the NFC South, have been better than the Bills, Jets and Dolphins on average. Five, six, and seven losing seasons out of 14 are good clubs? A team that hasn't made the playoffs since 2007? It proves they're all mediocre. Even the Jets went to back-to-back conference championship games. That makes two teams in the AFC East to do that in the last 10 years. No team in your division has ever done that. "It's about to get real for Brady now that he's playing the NFC South." Ha ha ha... Brady's record vs the NFC South: 17-4 4-1 vs. The Saints 6-0 vs. Falcons (Including a Super Bowl win) 3-3 vs. Panthers (Including a Super Bowl win) 4-0 vs. Buccaneers He should be afraid. Brady is playing with house money at this point, people already said he went off the cliff last year. You better hope that's true. You’re arguing with someone who is probably an anti-vaxxer.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Mar 18, 2020 16:48:53 GMT
Five, six, and seven losing seasons out of 14 are good clubs? A team that hasn't made the playoffs since 2007? It proves they're all mediocre. Even the Jets went to back-to-back conference championship games. That makes two teams in the AFC East to do that in the last 10 years. No team in your division has ever done that. "It's about to get real for Brady now that he's playing the NFC South." Ha ha ha... Brady's record vs the NFC South: 17-4 4-1 vs. The Saints 6-0 vs. Falcons (Including a Super Bowl win) 3-3 vs. Panthers (Including a Super Bowl win) 4-0 vs. Buccaneers He should be afraid. Brady is playing with house money at this point, people already said he went off the cliff last year. You better hope that's true. You’re arguing with someone who is probably an anti-vaxxer. Leave me be! With Brady skipping town, arguing past glory is all I have left.
|
|
|
Post by 尺ロㄈにモイ州凡几 on Mar 18, 2020 16:54:18 GMT
I never said Brady wasn't any good. I just said the Patriots have benefited annually from a weak division. And now he's in a division with a backup QB, a 41 year old quarterback, and a QB who had 1 good year. To the Brady hatters, the NFC South will be considered the weakest division in the 2020 season. Just you wait and see. Matt Ryan had only one good year? What are you smoking, dude?
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Mar 18, 2020 17:04:00 GMT
The Baltimore Ravens are quietly collecting really good defensive lineman.
They signed Michael Brockers away from the Rams yesterday. Today they acquired Calais Campbell from the Jags for just a 5th round pick.
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Mar 18, 2020 17:19:05 GMT
well thank you texans for being dumb.
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Mar 18, 2020 17:43:08 GMT
And now he's in a division with a backup QB, a 41 year old quarterback, and a QB who had 1 good year. To the Brady hatters, the NFC South will be considered the weakest division in the 2020 season. Just you wait and see. Matt Ryan had only one good year? What are you smoking, dude? Exactly, but that will be what people say to discredit the Buccaneers' success next year.
|
|