thenolan
Sophomore
@thenolan
Posts: 778
Likes: 162
|
Post by thenolan on Mar 8, 2020 15:30:53 GMT
Disney would not be casting wolverine. its not because no can can replace jackman, its because wolverine is a hard core character. disney would not want any backlash from a kiddie take of wolverine. The reason Fox cast Jackman and portrayed Wolverine like they did was because they didn't have the balls to make Wolverine the barbaric anti-hero that he should have been. But wolverine was the just that. also I would not call wolverine an anti hero. that is More Magneto's thing MCU fans dont know the comics. Would MCU even have the balls to let wolverine slay people like hugh did. mcu is for kids. their sometimes violence is more ps2 bloodless video game look. no threat.
|
|
|
Post by dazz on Mar 8, 2020 16:43:15 GMT
The reason Fox cast Jackman and portrayed Wolverine like they did was because they didn't have the balls to make Wolverine the barbaric anti-hero that he should have been. But wolverine was the just that. also I would not call wolverine an anti hero. that is More Magneto's thing MCU fans dont know the comics. Would MCU even have the balls to let wolverine slay people like hugh did. mcu is for kids. their sometimes violence is more ps2 bloodless video game look. no threat. You mean like Hugh did in that one R-rated movie? Maybe, maybe not, they could just do those films under the century films or whatever they rebranded Fox as rather than under the Disney banner, but Fox for 17 years didn't let Logan out of the cage until the characters final movie, and even then only after Deadpool proved itself a hit after being given a relatively low budget and YEARS of the actor and everyone else begging them to do it, and then Jackman had to agree to a lower fee so they could do the movie for just about $100m.
All but 3 of the Fox movies are the exact same as the MCU films, PG-13 which means limited blood, and most major blockbusters are the same way, it's accessible for children which means more money, but accessible for kids is not the same as being for kids, Sooty is for kids, Indiana Jones is for everyone, Halloween is for adults though in the case of for kids or for adults it's just a general rule as adults can enjoy kids stuff and kids can enjoy adult stuff, but stuff like the MCU, X-Men, Indiana Jones and such they are for everyone.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Mar 8, 2020 17:27:42 GMT
The reason Fox cast Jackman and portrayed Wolverine like they did was because they didn't have the balls to make Wolverine the barbaric anti-hero that he should have been. But wolverine was the just that. also I would not call wolverine an anti hero. that is More Magneto's thing MCU fans dont know the comics. Would MCU even have the balls to let wolverine slay people like hugh did. mcu is for kids. their sometimes violence is more ps2 bloodless video game look. no threat. Wolverine was just that? Yeah, you really need to watch these movies before you praise them too much. Jackman's Wolverine was made into leading-man material, like a cross between Indiana Jones and Craig's James Bond. Rough and barbaric he certainly was not.
|
|