|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 25, 2020 18:20:39 GMT
They did it for Frozen 2, but that had already competed its theatrical run. Should they just pull the trigger and put BW on Disney+ on May 1st? Or no?
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Mar 25, 2020 19:16:37 GMT
Hell no!
|
|
|
|
Post by coldenhaulfield on Mar 25, 2020 19:22:59 GMT
How come? There’s no wrong answer, just curious as to your reasoning. |
|
|
|
Post by James on Mar 25, 2020 20:14:41 GMT
How come? There’s no wrong answer, just curious as to your reasoning. Well like with most movies that were intended for a theatrical release, people are going to be incredibly upset when they won’t get the chance to see it the way they would want to. Also I think it is dumb to spend all that budget and not have it pay off. |
|
|
|
Post by scabab on Mar 25, 2020 20:24:29 GMT
I'd say no because the second it hits Disney+ it'll soon be all over Pirate Bay, a 1080p version to watch without having to pay a penny.
Admittedly that's what I usually do, I did that with the Mandalorian and would do the same with Black Widow along with probably millions of others and then it'll just cost it big time.
I also don't know if every country has Disney+, probably not.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spike Del Rey on Mar 26, 2020 14:21:46 GMT
No. Movies like this are meant to be seen on the big screen, and this is coming from someone who has a 75 inch 4K screen with surround sound at home. Once I've seen it on the big screen a time or two, I'll be content watching it on my TV, but not until then. Hell I even paid $13.50 a couple of weeks ago to see the 1933 King Kong at the cinema. You just can't replicate the big screen, no matter how good a home theater set up you might have.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 26, 2020 14:54:04 GMT
I'd rather not. But as a last resort if things get worse.
|
|
|
|
Post by blockbusted on Mar 26, 2020 16:43:42 GMT
No. Movies like this are meant to be seen on the big screen, and this is coming from someone who has a 75 inch 4K screen with surround sound at home. Once I've seen it on the big screen a time or two, I'll be content watching it on my TV, but not until then. Hell I even paid $13.50 a couple of weeks ago to see the 1933 King Kong at the cinema. You just can't replicate the big screen, no matter how good a home theater set up you might have. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I've heard that there are times that streaming services lack 1080p.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spike Del Rey on Mar 26, 2020 18:50:45 GMT
No. Movies like this are meant to be seen on the big screen, and this is coming from someone who has a 75 inch 4K screen with surround sound at home. Once I've seen it on the big screen a time or two, I'll be content watching it on my TV, but not until then. Hell I even paid $13.50 a couple of weeks ago to see the 1933 King Kong at the cinema. You just can't replicate the big screen, no matter how good a home theater set up you might have. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I've heard that there are times that streaming services lack 1080p.
|
|
raiderjedi
Sophomore
@raiderjedi
Posts: 452
Likes: 339
 
|
Post by raiderjedi on Mar 26, 2020 23:20:16 GMT
No. I want to see it on the big screen in dark theater with Dolby Atmos surround sound
|
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Mar 27, 2020 0:45:37 GMT
I think they should put it on Disney+ but make it pay-per-view, that way they don't lose money on it. Charge like $20 to watch it or something.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Mar 29, 2020 22:09:27 GMT
I seriously doubt the mouse is going to give up on up to a billion dollars of box office money.
|
|
