|
|
Post by Eva Yojimbo on Apr 4, 2020 6:23:42 GMT
One can go to the Wiki page on abiogenesis and check the references. Many are from books, many are from peer-reviewed papers. There's 50 references just in the intro. Plenty to read. I have that already. What do I need you for? I wasn't aware I ever implied you did need me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Arlon10 on Apr 4, 2020 12:02:53 GMT
I have that already. What do I need you for? Attempt to read it and understand it with your superlative reading powers and your over inflated intelligence?LOL Pigs might fly! You neither have the reading capacity nor the intelligence to absorb such ground breaking material. That's what I've been trying to tell you, but you're so s l o w. The page is obviously trying to keep up the hopes of the product of inferior public schools and make them feel better about the fact they have lower salaries than people who are not stupid.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Apr 4, 2020 12:25:18 GMT
Im an agnostic who does not take religion seriously. If fact I find it a little scary when people do. The fear then gets projected and becomes palpable. Fear is the key to understanding that death is eminent and that it is pointless to fear what cannot be controlled. Yet religions base so much of its ideology on fear of death, it has to create a deluded afterlife that is based on human experience.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Apr 4, 2020 12:34:15 GMT
"You still seem to be laboring under the delusion that the facts in intelligent design have not been thoroughly established by stringent scientific methods. They have." Please don't trot out a God of the Gaps, negative argument again. What is thoroughly establish is that there is no agency found in the natural world that can assemble life from lifeless matter. You know that much is true. QED. The natural world has limits, if it did not then it would be pointless whether the natural world or a "god" did anything. Your problem is that you believe you make the rules of debate. You do not. Negative proof is absolutely valid and used often in forensics. For example, "the car does not have enough miles on the odometer to have reached the scene, and there was not enough time to alter the odometer maliciously." Your "rule" about "Gods of the Gaps" is not a rule. It was made up by the product of inferior public schools who like to make all the rules without regard to any demonstrable utility. Please don't trot out the "I win because I make the rules" utter nonsense. Your problem Arlon, is that you are not debating or defending your stance with logic or reason.
How does the "natural world" have limitations? Please define "natural world" and what are the limitations in relation too? If you wouldn't mind defining your perception of "limitations" and how these fit in with how the natural world creates and rejuvenates. Remember Arlon, the world is only going to reflect back what you perceive in your own mind. Any limitations are yours to own, not anyone else's.
|
|
