It was as generic and useless CGI heavy like the rest of the MCU films. What I do wonder is how much did I miss not watching it cinema.
Some MCU fans love to argue MCU movies are about cinematic experiences but the truth is MCU movies always had awful cgi, awful cinematography. Many times their movies are loud meaning bad sound mixing, even the former highest grossing movie by the name of Avatar with the less than stellar plot compensated for a visual effect masterpiece unlike Russos, James Cameron is a real and respected talent.
Tell me I was wrong not to waste money. there was nothing endgame broke in the world of cinematic film making. Avatar and Titanic broke a lot of things that pushed film making forward. LOL even DOFP broke CBM visual making with the Quicksilver scene, a visual so broken that MCU Quicksilver never showed up in Endgame LMAO and Spiderverse is a ground breaking animated comic movie. Spiderman Sony and Fox X-Men have better films than the highest grossing movie of all time.
I think Endgame just made most people even hate the MCU more as a film art as it achieved nothing artistic. Its not avatar. So I should have no regrets missing it in cinema.
I saw Avatar twice in cinema.
James Cameron was right all along about the Avengers films
Wow. I don't think I've ever read such a retarded diatribe to a point where my head almost hurts physically.
1. Avatar was pretty much a digital backlot, so if anything, that film has a lot more CGI than Avengers: Endgame.
2. If
Avengers: Endgame had awful CGI overall, how did it get a nomination for Best Visual Effects? And yes, I've seen
1917, and I still question how that film even got nominated for Best Visual Effects over
Alita: Battle Angel or
Spider-Man: Far from Home in the first place.
3. MCU Quicksilver had to be killed off in
Avengers: Age of Ultron because of the rights issue. It wasn't because it was embarrassed of Fox version of Quicksilver.
4. You can't really make a proper comparison when it comes to
Into the Spider-Verse since there aren't a lot of DC/Marvel animated films that were released in cinemas.
5. You're giving too much credit to Sony and Fox for their successes.
Into the Spider-Verse succeeded because of Lord/Miller and not because of Sony, who, may I remind you, gave us
The Emoji Movie a year before while Fox wouldn't have made
Logan R-rated if it wasn't for
Deadpool, a film that they pretty much refused to support.
6.
Avengers: Endgame made people hate MCU more? Then how do you explain the massive success of
Spider-Man: Far from Home?
7. Again, James Cameron actually voiced support for
Avengers: Endgame and even congratulated the film when it beat the record set by
Avatar. And if James fricking Cameron of all people shows more class than you, you need to rethink your life - now.
8. I have to ask, what are you exactly trying to achieve here? Turn MCU fans into MCU haters and make them into Fox
X-Men fans in the process? If anything, your continuous belittling of MCU and its fans only turned them into Fox
X-Men haters.
9. Seriously, you've already got banned twice for this. Have you not learned anything from those bans? Is getting banned permanently from here your goal now?
10. Wait a minute. Are you implying that you haven't seen
Avengers: Endgame when it didn't get released in cinemas? Does that mean you were continuously belittling the film and anyone who liked it without even seeing the film in the first place?!
This is EoTRampage all over again, in which he continuously belittled
Pacific Rim and anyone who liked the film without even seeing it in for months.