|
|
Post by thebayharborbutcher on Apr 27, 2017 1:46:27 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on Apr 27, 2017 1:51:44 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on Apr 27, 2017 2:15:27 GMT
i don't know how to feel about this.
|
|
|
|
Post by sdrew13163 on Apr 27, 2017 3:45:37 GMT
I'm glad he's broadening his horizons in a way, but this seems strange for him. World War Z was an all-out action movie. Fincher has never done that before. Maybe they're going for a more suspenseful sequel rather than a "bigger and badder" action extravaganza.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Apr 27, 2017 4:30:40 GMT
If they are doing a complete 180 and sticking closer to the book, great. Otherwise, what a waste of Fincher's time.
|
|
|
|
Post by itsthatguyme on Apr 28, 2017 21:13:05 GMT
Why ? It's a bit late in the game. Zombies are OVER. ..at least for a lil while.
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Apr 28, 2017 23:41:53 GMT
I should probably watch 'World War Z 1'. Thanks for the news.
|
|
|
|
Post by salomonj on Apr 29, 2017 0:33:56 GMT
Ehh. I wan't a David Fincher thriller, not a zombie movie.
|
|
|
|
Post by salomonj on Apr 29, 2017 0:34:11 GMT
Pretty disappointing imo
|
|
|
|
Post by tastytomatoes on Apr 29, 2017 16:58:46 GMT
Excited to see how Fincher would approach the source material
|
|
|
|
Post by flasuss on Apr 30, 2017 2:04:25 GMT
If they are doing a complete 180 and sticking closer to the book, great. Otherwise, what a waste of Fincher's time. This. The book is great, but the movie seemingly was just interested in a cool title. |
|
