|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Apr 27, 2017 12:58:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by heeeeey on Apr 27, 2017 14:19:06 GMT
Am I the only one who thinks that album is overrated?
At the height of their popularity, they could've released an album of their farts and it would've been praised.
|
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Apr 27, 2017 15:14:36 GMT
Can't get anything but a black screen there. |
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on Apr 27, 2017 15:18:34 GMT
Am I the only one who thinks that album is overrated? At the height of their popularity, they could've released an album of their farts and it would've been praised. Wasn't the height of their popularity, which was in the early stages. They had disappeared from touring, and were starting to fade behind a lot of the other bands that were releasing and touring over nearly a year. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Apr 27, 2017 15:42:30 GMT
Am I the only one who thinks that album is overrated? At the height of their popularity, they could've released an album of their farts and it would've been praised. Wasn't the height of their popularity, which was in the early stages. They had disappeared from touring, and were starting to fade behind a lot of the other bands that were releasing and touring over nearly a year. No they were still big even after they stopped touring |
|
|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Apr 27, 2017 18:28:03 GMT
Can't get anything but a black screen there. Maybe copyright restricted to UK only? Works OK for me. |
|
|
|
Post by marco26 on Apr 27, 2017 21:56:17 GMT
Am I the only one who thinks that album is overrated? At the height of their popularity, they could've released an album of their farts and it would've been praised. 1. As another pointed out, when "Sgt. Pepper's" was worked on and released, The Beatles weren't at the height of their popularity. They were, however, at the height of their musical powers. 2. I am the biggest Beatles fan on planet Earth. Yes, "Sgt. Pepper's" is an insanely overrated album. Of their 13 albums it sits around 10th. While the majority of Beatles albums will have just one or two weak songs on it, "Sgt. Pepper's" has six or seven bad songs. It has more bad songs than good. That makes for a very poor album. One thing, though, must be considered. The album is a remarkable breakthrough in pop/rock music. It pushed creative boundaries like nothing before it. For that I can see why it is so highly regarded. But for the actual songs...they are mostly poor. A weak album musically, a massively strong album historically. |
|
