|
|
Post by GoodbyePorkPieHat on May 4, 2020 9:40:07 GMT
Any plans?
|
|
|
|
Post by My NoRevisionism Pillow on May 4, 2020 9:47:32 GMT
toy with Libs sensitive feelings
|
|
|
|
Post by cybajedi on May 4, 2020 9:56:51 GMT
Thought I may watch the Rise of Skywalker, heard it’s not great so not expecting much.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on May 4, 2020 10:01:03 GMT
Thought I may watch the Rise of Skywalker, heard it’s not great so not expecting much. If you like McGuffins you're going to love it.
|
|
|
|
Post by cybajedi on May 4, 2020 10:23:05 GMT
Thought I may watch the Rise of Skywalker, heard it’s not great so not expecting much. If you like McGuffins you're going to love it. Doesn’t sound promising. Maybe I’ll just watch Empire. |
|
|
|
Post by GoodbyePorkPieHat on May 4, 2020 10:49:32 GMT
I watched the original three bigscreen in the theater. I later re-watched them with a friend during a marathon session in 1991.
I tried to watch the fourth one, made it about 20 minutes, and thus ended that.
|
|
|
|
Post by nogbad on May 4, 2020 11:00:38 GMT
Thought I may watch the Rise of Skywalker, heard it’s not great so not expecting much. I think TFA and Rogue One are great, Solo decent, and TLJ shite. I had every hope that RoS would be the better than the latter, but they were cruelly dashed.
|
|
|
|
Post by cybajedi on May 4, 2020 11:35:45 GMT
I watched the original three bigscreen in the theater. I later re-watched them with a friend during a marathon session in 1991. I tried to watch the fourth one, made it about 20 minutes, and thus ended that. I was a bit young to catch the first three in cinemas but there was a digitally remastered release in cinemas maybe 20 years ago and I managed to see all three on the big screen. |
|
|
|
Post by jpat99 on May 4, 2020 12:18:34 GMT
Big ones!
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on May 4, 2020 14:20:14 GMT
Honestly, I’m a lukewarm Star Wars fan. I’m more Team Star Trek.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoodbyePorkPieHat on May 4, 2020 19:32:53 GMT
Honestly, I’m a lukewarm Star Wars fan. I’m more Team Star Trek. Same here. "Star Trek" is at least legit sci-fi whereas "Star Wars" is really medieval fantasy with a sci-fi facade.
|
|
|
|
Post by Dracula on May 4, 2020 19:38:37 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Dirty Santa PaulsLaugh on May 4, 2020 19:42:22 GMT
Honestly, I’m a lukewarm Star Wars fan. I’m more Team Star Trek. Same here. "Star Trek" is at least legit sci-fi whereas "Star Wars" is really medieval fantasy with a sci-fi facade. I love the original movie. It’s a sci-fi classic.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lux on May 4, 2020 19:48:14 GMT
Honestly, I’m a lukewarm Star Wars fan. I’m more Team Star Trek. Same here. "Star Trek" is at least legit sci-fi whereas "Star Wars" is really medieval fantasy with a sci-fi facade. Teleporting across the universe from planet to planet is "legit sci-fi"? I like both star trek and wars but I wouldn't go that far. |
|
|
|
Post by cybajedi on May 4, 2020 19:55:27 GMT
Same here. "Star Trek" is at least legit sci-fi whereas "Star Wars" is really medieval fantasy with a sci-fi facade. Teleporting across the universe from planet to planet is "legit sci-fi"? I like both star trek and wars but I wouldn't go that far. No need to get upset |
|
|
|
Post by merh on May 4, 2020 19:55:44 GMT
If you like McGuffins you're going to love it. Doesn’t sound promising. Maybe I’ll just watch Empire. It wrapped things up best it could after the last film destroyed all the carefully laid plot points. It worked. That was all I hoped for.
|
|
|
|
Post by GoodbyePorkPieHat on May 4, 2020 19:56:12 GMT
Same here. "Star Trek" is at least legit sci-fi whereas "Star Wars" is really medieval fantasy with a sci-fi facade. Teleporting across the universe from planet to planet is "legit sci-fi"? I like both star trek and wars but I wouldn't go that far. That sounds more like "Stargate". However, I agree that the "transporter" (and the replicator) are plot devices that are extremely unlikely to ever be developed - in part because of the tremendous amount of energy they would require but mainly because of the nature of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle.
|
|
|
|
Post by cybajedi on May 4, 2020 19:58:08 GMT
Doesn’t sound promising. Maybe I’ll just watch Empire. It wrapped things up best it could after the last film destroyed all the carefully laid plot points. It worked. That was all I hoped for. Ending up watching Empire, I’ll give Rise a watch sometime soon. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on May 4, 2020 19:59:56 GMT
Teleporting across the universe from planet to planet is "legit sci-fi"? I like both star trek and wars but I wouldn't go that far. That sounds more like "Stargate". However, I agree that the "transporter" (and the replicator) are plot devices that are extremely unlikely to ever be developed - in part because of the tremendous amount of energy they would require but mainly because of the nature of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle. Sounds like Stargate too but you do know that star trek does offworld teleportation too... |
|
|
|
Post by sublime92 on May 4, 2020 20:21:47 GMT
So, there are fans who have been painstakingly working to uproot those wishes of Lucas by scanning and restoring 35mm theatrical release prints of the original trilogy in 4K resolution. Though it won't produce the exemplary details of an original negative, it's an emulation of what audiences probably saw during the original theatrical run. Organic grain, deeper contrast and flicker. Again, it's not a definitive version but it's the sharpest we'll ever get to see of the original, unaltered trilogy that we all grew of age with. Check it out... www.thestarwarstrilogy.com/project-4k77/
|
|
