Ned

You didn't miss a lot. The riot lover Father Jack was trolling as usual but this time on politics board, this time he questioned whether a black man posting on politics board was really a black man given that the black man didn't succumb to his shitty liberal agenda. Good riddance for a little while. I can't believe the world is full of pests who want you to follow their political agenda or else demand that you be kicked out of your job or who cast question on your race because they have a predefined picture of how people of every race should behave. The real racists are minority appeasers who believe white people have higher standards and so they need to be criticised more strongly. Hope we don't see Ned for at least 10 days. I don't want more supporters of violence.

I know you like him but his political position is horrible. You know how he deleted the first time? Right after Manchester Arena bombing he said on RFS board that those bombings were justified because of how western countries have behaved in the middle east. Just minutes after the news of bombing surfaced he managed to piss off the entire board. Everyone felt disgusted by him and so he deleted his profile. It's a pattern that never changes. He justifies goons, terrorists and not just them but even the acts of terrorism. 

When I read that a black Wall Street CEO or Meghan (the wife of former(?) Prince Harry) say they could have been in the position of George Floyd, then I have my WTF-moment.


The fact that Floyd was poor had more with his death to do than his skin color.


Meghan whatever titles she holds by now will never ever be put on the ground and suffocated to death by a cop.

And everyone seem to eclipse the fact that both knew each other, that they had even been co-workers for some time. This was not some random black guy.

If if you listen to Derek Chauvin's sneerings, then it seems that there was some bad blood between these two.




This has less to do with race, but a certain culture within the police, and the poor get the most of it, and it is black ppl who are among the poorest.

But in this case maybe not even this but a private feud, or an open score.


And yet it is all about race.


Anyway. I have no problem if the people protest against poverty - although they hardly do although it is the main reason for this injustice, or police brutality, or racism, but riots, the looting of jobs, the destruction of public and private property, kill officers who had nothing to do with this: NO!!!


And fucking Obama. What has he done in his eight years to solve these problems: poverty in general, and especially among Afro-American. Police brutality, the blue wall of silence that makes it next to impossible to bring corrupt officer to justice.

Neither were these eight years an absent of police brutality, but one was soft on this issue with a Democratic president, even with a black one, nor does it justice to the actual development:


www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4672939/

The gap between white and black victim is constantly getting closer and closer.


That Trump was possible, that he was the answer of the people to Obama's eight years, says more about Obama then his critique on Trump.

Maybe he should ask himself some question. Why is Trump my legacy?!

A man filled with agenda is a man filled with agenda. Just because the agenda happens to be liberal doesn't make it above criticism.  

The thing is this. Ned for long has behaved with extreme hypocrisy.  A racist incident happened in one of the clubs in Israel and he wanted to see the whole stadium burn for that. Much more racist incidents or horrible incidents have happened elsewhere but he would chose to be quiet.  He would bash Jews for non-therapeutic circumcision practised by them on babies (I totally agree with him that is child abuse). But if someone said the same about the same practise by Muslims he will believe the people doing the bashing are racists. He believes himself to be some sort of defender of minority rights. But what he actually believes is that he has a higher moral ground than others just because he is a liberal. The same thing Jpat explained him in the thread you read. 

In America, where success is even more worshiped than in other western countries, saying that your bad treatment is not so much based on your skin color, but instead on your low social status (if they knew, for example, that Floyd was Obama's cousin or something like that, they would surely have treated him much better), would be the same as admitting that you are a "loser" in this society.

The politics board? I'd hate think what a clusterfuck of vaccuous ignorance that looks like at the moment...