|
Post by politicidal on Jun 9, 2020 13:38:37 GMT
|
|
|
Post by James on Jun 9, 2020 19:29:09 GMT
"Evil Dead Now"? Meh...
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Jun 10, 2020 13:22:21 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous Andy on Jun 19, 2020 20:12:49 GMT
Hopefully, not another female lead character. Why?
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Jun 19, 2020 20:30:07 GMT
Down with the white patriarchy.
I am guessing the lead will be someone who looks like whoever Joe Biden picks as VP.
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Jun 20, 2020 5:30:20 GMT
It's not really an Evil Dead film without Bruce Campbell.
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Jun 20, 2020 14:00:10 GMT
It's not really an Evil Dead film without Bruce Campbell. The remake/reboot whatever was actually perfectly decent. It was well made and pretty compelling, but it didn't feel like Evil Dead. The series was a great deal of fun. If they're moving on they should pick it up from there. I actually didn't finish it, so I dont know where it leaves off, but I imagine that could work even if Bruce Campbell is done with Ash.
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Jun 28, 2020 7:32:27 GMT
It's not really an Evil Dead film without Bruce Campbell. The remake/reboot whatever was actually perfectly decent. It was well made and pretty compelling, but it didn't feel like Evil Dead. The series was a great deal of fun. If they're moving on they should pick it up from there. I actually didn't finish it, so I dont know where it leaves off, but I imagine that could work even if Bruce Campbell is done with Ash. The remake didn't really work for me. The effects were excellent but it lacked the charm of the originals, if that makes any sense. As you said yourself, it didn't really feel like Evil Dead.
|
|
|
Post by Martin Brundle - Martinfly on Jun 28, 2020 12:15:12 GMT
The remake/reboot whatever was actually perfectly decent. It was well made and pretty compelling, but it didn't feel like Evil Dead. The series was a great deal of fun. If they're moving on they should pick it up from there. I actually didn't finish it, so I dont know where it leaves off, but I imagine that could work even if Bruce Campbell is done with Ash. The remake didn't really work for me. The effects were excellent but it lacked the charm of the originals, if that makes any sense. As you said yourself, it didn't really feel like Evil Dead. It's the general consensus. It wasn't "colorful" and "crazy" like the original Evil Dead, let alone Evil Dead II or the TV series. It felt like a pretty generic, albeit if well-done, scary and serious modern horror movie without the hallucinating genius of Evil Dead.
|
|
|
Post by masterofallgoons on Jun 28, 2020 12:20:49 GMT
The remake/reboot whatever was actually perfectly decent. It was well made and pretty compelling, but it didn't feel like Evil Dead. The series was a great deal of fun. If they're moving on they should pick it up from there. I actually didn't finish it, so I dont know where it leaves off, but I imagine that could work even if Bruce Campbell is done with Ash. The remake didn't really work for me. The effects were excellent but it lacked the charm of the originals, if that makes any sense. As you said yourself, it didn't really feel like Evil Dead. Yeah, I just had to look at it as a new movie with the same concept. It didn't do anything to attempt to approximate the same tone, but as a showcase for the director, for the effects, and for a somewhat different, clever, and character driven approach to a cabin-in-the-woods horror movie. I thought it was pretty solid. I'd rather it was just a new and different movie with a similar concept, but for the movie we got it could have been a lot worse.
|
|