|
Post by janntosh on Jun 22, 2020 16:02:14 GMT
What’s weird is that Spider-Man 2’s FX were much better, but then they went back to being bad again In Spider-Man 3
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Jun 23, 2020 15:03:42 GMT
I never noticed anything wrong with the special effects.
|
|
|
Post by johnspartan on Jun 23, 2020 17:35:27 GMT
Who will be the next Roger Ebert? Answer:Nobody, because professional movie reviewers are no longer allowed to express dissenting opinions that could hurt ticket sales.
|
|
|
Post by Anonymous Andy on Jun 23, 2020 17:56:15 GMT
The CGI has always looked a little dodgy in that film, but nowhere near as bad as Daredevil, released less than a year later. It's still a good film. Who cares.
|
|
|
Post by Captain Spencer on Jun 23, 2020 17:57:32 GMT
Who will be the next Roger Ebert? Answer:Nobody, because professional movie reviewers are no longer allowed to express dissenting opinions that could hurt ticket sales. Sad but true.
|
|