|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jun 24, 2020 11:17:25 GMT
The Three Musketeers (1948), directed by George Sidney. The first half -- the adventure of the queen's diamonds -- is light and very silly, taking full advantage of Gene Kelly's athletic ability and comic mugging. The second half -- the exposure of Milady de Winter -- is darker. We might expect that she and Constance would be spared in this version, but it is not to be. The two-part structure was used again by George MacDonald Fraser in his fine screenplay for The Three Musketeers (1973) and The Four Musketeers (1974). He praises this version in The Hollywood History of the World and I suspect he had it in mind when he wrote his own treatment. It's impressive how much of the original story gets covered in the films. As adventure entertainment it is only so-so: the light costuming and California country locations take us out of the fantasy, but we have exciting sword fights and impressive acrobatics. A fine cast: - Gene Kelly: brash, love-struck D'Artagnan -- a real historical character!
- Lana Turner: wicked Milady, keeping a dark secret
- Van Heflin: anguished Athos
- Vincent Price: sinister, crafty Richelieu, apparently not a Cardinal in this version
- Frank Morgan: ridiculous but pitiable King Louis; we hate to see anyone under Richelieu's thumb
- Angela Lansbury (age 23): the adulteress Queen, although we never seem to mind
- June Allyson: D'Artagnan's lady love; they marry in this version and we have a Romeo & Juliet morning-after bedroom scene
- Keenan Wynn: long suffering servant Planchet
This must have been spectacular Technicolor when it was new, but the DVD quality is only fair. Will we ever see a restoration? 
|
|
|
|
Post by OldAussie on Jun 24, 2020 11:36:13 GMT
Always enjoyed it. Great cast. But they do seem to get over Constance's death rather quickly.
The Athos/Milady relationship is my favourite part of every version of the story.
|
|
|
|
Post by marshamae on Jun 24, 2020 13:21:44 GMT
Me too Aussie. You sort of wish every mean girl had a figure like Athos in her background , ready with the goods to bring her to account.
Everyone in this film was on their A game and yet it doesn’t quite add up. I blame Kelly’s failure to get me to take him seriously. In character, he is a lot like his pal Frank Sinatra, an angry guy with a nice boy screen persona. Sinatra managed to tap into that anger and sorrow to become an accomplished dramatic actor, succeeding in some very dark roles. Kelly somehow held on to his nice boy face and was not able to convince in serious roles though he tried several times
But for all that it’s an enjoyable romp though I like tge Frasier Donner films better
|
|