|
|
Post by kls on Jul 8, 2020 21:31:23 GMT
Catman thought perhaps women wanted to be treated as individuals. Bingo! We have a winner, folks! |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Jul 8, 2020 21:33:05 GMT
Many women fall in love with a guy, then for some strange reason try to change him into something he's not, they forget what they fell in love with in the first place. Then they wonder why the marriage or relationship is failing. Curious methinks.
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jul 8, 2020 21:36:25 GMT
After experiencing 50 years of marriage I can concur with that.  Women are not easy creatures to understand. We don't always understand ourselves. Al We're complicated Yeah, women seem more complicated and more mysterious. I suspect that may be a big part of what makes me gay. I like how men can be so simple. Bottom line is men are horny. And they smell good. |
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Jul 8, 2020 21:41:53 GMT
 "Well... in my experience, women find it very endearing to have death threats left on their answering machines." |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Jul 8, 2020 21:42:32 GMT
dirtypillows - the complication of women is part of their attraction. Each to his own.
|
|
|
|
Post by enigma72 on Jul 8, 2020 21:47:45 GMT
Many women fall in love with a guy, then for some strange reason try to change him into something he's not, they forget what they fell in love with in the first place. Then they wonder why the marriage or relationship is failing. Curious methinks. I read a quip long ago: When a couple marry the man looks at his bride and hopes she never changes; the woman looks at the man and sees potential to be molded into what she wants. I don't feel that way but there may be an element of truth to it in the general sense |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Jul 8, 2020 21:55:06 GMT
enigma72Which is why I said "Many women" not "all women".
|
|
|
|
Post by kls on Jul 8, 2020 21:55:54 GMT
Many women fall in love with a guy, then for some strange reason try to change him into something he's not, they forget what they fell in love with in the first place. Then they wonder why the marriage or relationship is failing. Curious methinks. I think that can be true. I think with men the opposite might be more common-thinking she will never change (no matter what the years might bring). Do you think that might be right? |
|
|
|
Post by kls on Jul 8, 2020 21:56:43 GMT
Many women fall in love with a guy, then for some strange reason try to change him into something he's not, they forget what they fell in love with in the first place. Then they wonder why the marriage or relationship is failing. Curious methinks. I read a quip long ago: When a couple marry the man looks at his bride and hopes she never changes; the woman looks at the man and sees potential to be molded into what she wants. I don't feel that way but there may be an element of truth to it in the general sense I missed this before I posted. |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Jul 8, 2020 22:00:51 GMT
kls Only if all men are the same. And they're certainly not.
|
|
|
|
Post by gameboy on Jul 9, 2020 1:11:09 GMT
I gave an extreme example. I'm just saying the guy who fawns over a woman is less interesting than the cocky guy who doesn't lay all his cards on the table. And it's not just women. Men will be more aroused by the women who's hard to get than the doormat who is too easy. Okay, I’ll just go along the the concept that we’re all the same and follow the same set of clearly laid out rules and shut the fuck up. Pffffffft. There you go again with that same logical flaw. A general rule does not mean there will not be exceptions to that general rule. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jul 9, 2020 1:38:56 GMT
dirtypillows - the complication of women is part of their attraction. Each to his own. Did you mean to say "part of their attractiveness"? Attraction can in itself be a very complicated thing and we like who we like. Maybe some men like a challenge. Maybe some men want to figure out the mystery. And I say "Go, boy, go!" But for me, I don't like games. At all. Not in the slightest. I like transparency in my partner. Maybe that's another reason for me to prefer guys. A fellow's stuff is hanging out there all on display and if the guy is turned on, there can be no mistaking it. I'm no good at guessing, and a hard dong comes at me guess work free. |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Jul 9, 2020 1:50:53 GMT
dirtypillows --- Re attractiveness or attraction. Answer: Either or both. I mean no disrespect but I have no interest in gay relationships. None whatsoever. As I said... "Each to his own". Or her's of course.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jul 9, 2020 8:08:33 GMT
Okay, I’ll just go along the the concept that we’re all the same and follow the same set of clearly laid out rules and shut the fuck up. Pffffffft. There you go again with that same logical flaw. A general rule does not mean there will not be exceptions to that general rule. I’d say your refusal to acknowledge exceptions to the rule is the failing.  |
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jul 9, 2020 11:00:26 GMT
Pffffffft. There you go again with that same logical flaw. A general rule does not mean there will not be exceptions to that general rule. I’d your your refusal to acknowledge exceptions to the rule is the failing. The exceptions to the rule are often more interesting. |
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Jul 9, 2020 11:24:29 GMT
This woman wants to be treated as a human being first, and a woman second. I'd wager that most women would be happy with being treated similarly, without their gender being the primary consideration in most things.
|
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 9, 2020 12:59:37 GMT
dirtypillows - the complication of women is part of their attraction. Each to his own. Imagine the complications of a lesbian relationship then. Double the confusion. |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 9, 2020 13:10:46 GMT
dirtypillows --- Re attractiveness or attraction. Answer: Either or both. I mean no disrespect but I have no interest in gay relationships. None whatsoever. As I said... "Each to his own". Or her's of course. His point was putting some perspective into your reasoning for what can attract some men to women, or why to some men they are not sexually attractive. He’s not asking for you to be interested. |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Jul 9, 2020 13:39:44 GMT
Toasted Cheese - Quite. But I simply stated that "the complication of women is part of their attraction." No reasoning involved and quite easy to understand without him giving an insight into his gay relationship, about which I have no interest, nor asked for. Also I'm quite sure he can answer for himself.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jul 9, 2020 13:45:05 GMT
I’d your your refusal to acknowledge exceptions to the rule is the failing. The exceptions to the rule are often more interesting. My inability to read what I typed before posting is a HUGE failing. It looks like my typing finger has a stammer. |
|
Women are not easy creatures to understand. 
