|
|
Post by gameboy on Jul 9, 2020 14:00:03 GMT
Pffffffft. There you go again with that same logical flaw. A general rule does not mean there will not be exceptions to that general rule. I’d say your refusal to acknowledge exceptions to the rule is the failing.  I'm not sure where I ever did that. For simplicity in rhetoric one can say "a man has two legs" without some fool whining "but but but I know an amputee!" That's just silliness and obfuscation. |
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jul 9, 2020 14:13:11 GMT
I’d say your refusal to acknowledge exceptions to the rule is the failing. I'm not sure where I ever did that. For simplicity in rhetoric one can say "a man has two legs" without some fool whining "but but but I know an amputee!" That's just silliness and obfuscation. I don’t do that rhetoric thing, I’m just one of those common plebs who talks or chats. |
|
|
|
Post by gameboy on Jul 9, 2020 14:19:52 GMT
I'm not sure where I ever did that. For simplicity in rhetoric one can say "a man has two legs" without some fool whining "but but but I know an amputee!" That's just silliness and obfuscation. I don’t do that rhetoric thing, I’m just one of those common plebs who talks or chats. Rhetoric is just the art of arguing. You argue all the time. |
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Jul 9, 2020 14:39:03 GMT
I don’t do that rhetoric thing, I’m just one of those common plebs who talks or chats. Rhetoric is just the art of arguing. You argue all the time. But not as an art. Anyway, I just liked the idea of a man who sounds like a terminally depressed Kermit The Frog telling men to be more like pirates or vampires. Perhaps you should debate this cat clutching thing with the Filmboard ladies. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jul 9, 2020 16:58:37 GMT
dirtypillows - the complication of women is part of their attraction. Each to his own. Imagine the complications of a lesbian relationship then. Double the confusion. Yes, and double the jealousy and double the estrogen and then stand back and watch the violent art of hair pulling. I've seen it. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jul 9, 2020 17:09:38 GMT
Toasted Cheese - Quite. But I simply stated that "the complication of women is part of their attraction." No reasoning involved and quite easy to understand without him giving an insight into his gay relationship, about which I have no interest, nor asked for. Also I'm quite sure he can answer for himself. Alfromni - My post wasn't meant just for you to read. And if it felt like I was answering your unasked question, then well, don't worry about that because I wasn't. I was just expressing my point of view. As a member of this large virtually-realized family, I have as much right as any to post. (Just wanted to get that out of the way.) But really I posted my interpretation via my POV because I wanted to. And I did it mostly for me, and secondly for anybody else who would want to read my post. Though I do have to disagree that I dont find the attractiveness of females "easy to understand", hence my response. It sounds like you let yourself get worked up over something that you didn't enjoy reading, i.e., my insights. You've repeated yourself two or three times now. Bottom line is everybody has their own story and everybody who posts here wants to be heard. And I've heard you. And I guess you've heard me, too. Though, just so you know, you may hear me again. So, if my sensibilities or my gay lust offends you, well, there are ways around that.  |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on Jul 9, 2020 17:15:11 GMT
dirtypillows - You actually asked "Did you mean to say "part of their attractiveness"? so I took that as a question to me, together with your follow-up remarks. However, enough said. I've nothing further to discuss on the matter.
|
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jul 9, 2020 17:16:58 GMT
dirtypillows --- Re attractiveness or attraction. Answer: Either or both. I mean no disrespect but I have no interest in gay relationships. None whatsoever. As I said... "Each to his own". Or her's of course. His point was putting some perspective into your reasoning for what can attract some men to women, or why to some men they are not sexually attractive. He’s not asking for you to be interested. Exactly. I wasn't asking him to be interested in what I was saying. I wouldn't think that needed clarification, but thank you, Toasted Cheese, for clarifying. |
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Jul 9, 2020 18:11:14 GMT
dirtypillows - You actually asked "Did you mean to say "part of their attractiveness"? so I took that as a question to me, together with your follow-up remarks. However, enough said. I've nothing further to discuss on the matter. Good. Now I can post about how the Aztec word "avocado" came to get its name! |
|
|
|
Post by Toasted Cheese on Jul 10, 2020 7:30:13 GMT
Imagine the complications of a lesbian relationship then. Double the confusion. Yes, and double the jealousy and double the estrogen and then stand back and watch the violent art of hair pulling. I've seen it. Many ”womins” are in denial about their own attitudes and state of being. I have been hearing it all week in the flesh and it appears many only want to hear about how special they are over men. They don’t even get themselves and then expect men to understand them or what they want. I have just had a chance earlier to watch that clip with Jordan. He ended on an air of frustration and an “I give up” kinda tonality with the complications surrounding women. It is born of insecurity of gender and I can’t really see it as anything but. What else could it be? |
|
