|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 2:35:29 GMT
Not my problem...perhaps more yours? A claim that the disease is NOT spread by droplet infection is your problem, but denial of the disease is not? Neither are my problem. You allowing misinformation spread on your site unchallenged, is more your problem than mine, thankfully. *****skips off to play in the winter sunshine on the beach*****
...maybe a spot of whale watching from the clifftops?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2020 2:52:09 GMT
A claim that the disease is NOT spread by droplet infection is your problem, but denial of the disease is not? Neither are my problem. You allowing misinformation spread on your site unchallenged, is more your problem than mine, thankfully. *****skips off to play in the winter sunshine on the beach*****
...maybe a spot of whale watching from the clifftops?It was bad form for me to respond to a person who did this after I complained. Just so you know.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 3:01:08 GMT
A claim that the disease is NOT spread by droplet infection is your problem, but denial of the disease is not? Neither are my problem. You allowing misinformation spread on your site unchallenged, is more your problem than mine, thankfully. *****skips off to play in the winter sunshine on the beach*****
...maybe a spot of whale watching from the clifftops?I see. You're just interested in one of them. Cool 'nuff. Oh, it's not gone unchallenged, Goz. Not in the least. In fact, you yourself are one the challengers. The question is whether or not it "could result in serious consequences for the public at large" as stated in the policy: support.proboards.com/thread/661355/covid-19-global-health-emergencyThere seems to be a fine line (at least in this case) between violating their policy and exercising the simple right to question our government. If you feel that I'm not taking action when I should be, then I suggest you click the link in the policy. Third paragraph, bold print. You can't miss it. If they determine it to be a violation of their policy, they'll let me know and I'll oblige. In the meantime, you can let me know when you see someone posting the health benefits of drinking Pine Sol and how it cures CV-19.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 3:04:36 GMT
Neither are my problem. You allowing misinformation spread on your site unchallenged, is more your problem than mine, thankfully. *****skips off to play in the winter sunshine on the beach*****
...maybe a spot of whale watching from the clifftops?It was bad form for me to respond to a person who did this after I complained. Just so you know. Yeah. It is. It's like calling for clean-up in aisle 5 as you're spreading it all over the floor.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Jul 16, 2020 3:13:11 GMT
It was bad form for me to respond to a person who did this after I complained. Just so you know. Yeah. It is. It's like calling for clean-up in aisle 5 as you're spreading it all over the floor. It's also me correcting a religious nutcase and pointing out how far he/she is removed from reality!
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 5:14:47 GMT
Yeah. It is. It's like calling for clean-up in aisle 5 as you're spreading it all over the floor. It's also me correcting a religious nutcase and pointing out how far he/she is removed from reality! Which is fine, but when you report it, what do you expect or hope to happen?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 5:28:33 GMT
Neither are my problem. You allowing misinformation spread on your site unchallenged, is more your problem than mine, thankfully. *****skips off to play in the winter sunshine on the beach*****
...maybe a spot of whale watching from the clifftops?I see. You're just interested in one of them. Cool 'nuff. Oh, it's not gone unchallenged, Goz. Not in the least. In fact, you yourself are one the challengers. The question is whether or not it "could result in serious consequences for the public at large" as stated in the policy: support.proboards.com/thread/661355/covid-19-global-health-emergencyThere seems to be a fine line (at least in this case) between violating their policy and exercising the simple right to question our government. If you feel that I'm not taking action when I should be, then I suggest you click the link in the policy. Third paragraph, bold print. You can't miss it. If they determine it to be a violation of their policy, they'll let me know and I'll oblige. In the meantime, you can let me know when you see someone posting the health benefits of drinking Pine Sol and how it cures CV-19. Even as a foreigner, I understand, more than you might realise how difficult this situation must be, and IS for every right thinking American. The very fact that your government is 'divided' in its Covid response, and some of the information is contradictory... makes the kind of decisions that ProBoards and you have been faced with, to be really difficult. The fact is however that ProBoards have made it mandatory to report items on ALL boards which HOWEVER, ProBoards made it quite clear which sources were to be used as a source of 'truth' in their view. Someone who states questioning of your Government is a voluntary and acceptable sentiment, whether pro or against the government line...no problem...I do it myself all the time HOWEVER someone claiming misinformation that the Covid 19 is NOT spread by droplet and/or airborne contamination, which is scientifically unsound information ie 'misinformation' in my view is guilty of spreading misinformation. EVEN the wearing of masks is an optional decision in my view of the misinformation stakes HOWEVER misinformation is misinformation and if people on these Board agree that Covid-19 is NOT spread my breathing coughing and sneezing to infect others IMHO this misinformation could lead to "could result in serious consequences for the public at large" as stated in the policy: ie NONE of the sources that ProBoards recommend say that Covid-19 is NOT droplet infection not airborne. Over to you, boss. .....THAT is harmful misinformation in my view.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 5:40:48 GMT
I see. You're just interested in one of them. Cool 'nuff. Oh, it's not gone unchallenged, Goz. Not in the least. In fact, you yourself are one the challengers. The question is whether or not it "could result in serious consequences for the public at large" as stated in the policy: support.proboards.com/thread/661355/covid-19-global-health-emergencyThere seems to be a fine line (at least in this case) between violating their policy and exercising the simple right to question our government. If you feel that I'm not taking action when I should be, then I suggest you click the link in the policy. Third paragraph, bold print. You can't miss it. If they determine it to be a violation of their policy, they'll let me know and I'll oblige. In the meantime, you can let me know when you see someone posting the health benefits of drinking Pine Sol and how it cures CV-19. Even as a foreigner, I understand, more than you might realise how difficult this situation must be, and IS for every right thinking American. The very fact that your government is 'divided' in its Covid response, and some of the information is contradictory... makes the kind of decisions that ProBoards and you have been faced with, to be really difficult. The fact is however that ProBoards have made it mandatory to report items on ALL boards which HOWEVER, ProBoards made it quite clear which sources were to be used as a source of 'truth' in their view. Someone who states questioning of your Government is a voluntary and acceptable sentiment, whether pro or against the government line...no problem...I do it myself all the time HOWEVER someone claiming misinformation that the Covid 19 is NOT spread by droplet and/or airborne contamination, which is scientifically unsound information ie 'misinformation' in my view is guilty of spreading misinformation. EVEN the wearing of masks is an optional decision in my view of the misinformation stakes HOWEVER misinformation is misinformation and if people on these Board agree that Covid-19 is NOT spread my breathing coughing and sneezing to infect others IMHO this misinformation could lead to "could result in serious consequences for the public at large" as stated in the policy: ie NONE of the sources that ProBoards recommend say that Covid-19 is NOT droplet infection not airborne. Over to you, boss. .....THAT is harmful misinformation in my view. If this doesn't produce the results you want: www.proboards.com/user-guide/post-options/reporting-post...then try this: www.proboards.com/report-abuse/illegalBeyond that, there's just not much you can do. Just keep on challenging.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 5:48:44 GMT
Even as a foreigner, I understand, more than you might realise how difficult this situation must be, and IS for every right thinking American. The very fact that your government is 'divided' in its Covid response, and some of the information is contradictory... makes the kind of decisions that ProBoards and you have been faced with, to be really difficult. The fact is however that ProBoards have made it mandatory to report items on ALL boards which HOWEVER, ProBoards made it quite clear which sources were to be used as a source of 'truth' in their view. Someone who states questioning of your Government is a voluntary and acceptable sentiment, whether pro or against the government line...no problem...I do it myself all the time HOWEVER someone claiming misinformation that the Covid 19 is NOT spread by droplet and/or airborne contamination, which is scientifically unsound information ie 'misinformation' in my view is guilty of spreading misinformation. EVEN the wearing of masks is an optional decision in my view of the misinformation stakes HOWEVER misinformation is misinformation and if people on these Board agree that Covid-19 is NOT spread my breathing coughing and sneezing to infect others IMHO this misinformation could lead to "could result in serious consequences for the public at large" as stated in the policy: ie NONE of the sources that ProBoards recommend say that Covid-19 is NOT droplet infection not airborne. Over to you, boss. .....THAT is harmful misinformation in my view. If this doesn't produce the results you want: www.proboards.com/user-guide/post-options/reporting-post...then try this: www.proboards.com/report-abuse/illegalBeyond that, there's just not much you can do. Just keep on challenging. My only response to this post, is that I didn't realise that there were no repercussions for admins on all the ProBoards for allowing on their individual ProBoard. Good to know.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 6:40:19 GMT
My only response to this post, is that I didn't realise that there were no repercussions for admins on all the ProBoards for allowing on their individual ProBoard. Good to know. If they feel that I'm allowing something I shouldn't, they'll let me know. If I don't comply, the repercussions for me are the same for everyone: They'll just close the forum. Let's talk about what's really going on here. You want Erjen gone, and Maya, too. You think you found the right ammo to accomplish that and I disagree. PB leaves things like this up to the discretion of the admins, but occasionally I disagree with them too. However, it is ultimately their decision. So call them up and we'll let them be the judge. I won't even argue. Remember what I said: It's a policy, not a weapon.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 6:46:37 GMT
My only response to this post, is that I didn't realise that there were no repercussions for admins on all the ProBoards for allowing on their individual ProBoard. Good to know.
You need to calm down.
You're practically asking to get banned at this point, with the ominous threats in that last post of yours.
The Admin here does a good job. You're supposed to come here and have fun and chat. Not challenge him and act like an annoying malcontent.
Yes. Admin does a good job on these Boards. I have always accepted his decisions and what he tells me. I am an admin supporter. My comments above are about what is the situation between what an admin on ANY ProBoards can do. I hope he knows that it is not personal. I also admitted that the decisions are REALLY difficult due to the differences between what the American 'Government' is saying and what the sources that ProBoards support... are saying. DON'T blame me for these differentials. THAT is not my problem. I am just a foreign poster looking at the facts.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 6:48:20 GMT
My only response to this post, is that I didn't realise that there were no repercussions for admins on all the ProBoards for allowing on their individual ProBoard. Good to know. If they feel that I'm allowing something I shouldn't, they'll let me know. If I don't comply, the repercussions for me are the same for everyone: They'll just close the forum. Let's talk about what's really going on here. You want Erjen gone, and Maya, too. You think you found the right ammo to accomplish that and I disagree. PB leaves things like this up to the discretion of the admins, but occasionally I disagree with them too. However, it is ultimately their decision. So call them up and we'll let them be the judge. I won't even argue. Remember what I said: It's a policy, not a weapon. No. I am not now interested in the personalities Rules are rules..
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 6:56:11 GMT
My only response to this post, is that I didn't realise that there were no repercussions for admins on all the ProBoards for allowing on their individual ProBoard. Good to know.
You need to calm down.
You're practically asking to get banned at this point, with the ominous threats in that last post of yours.
The Admin here does a good job. You're supposed to come here and have fun and chat. Not challenge him and act like an annoying malcontent.
...on what grounds?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 7:02:30 GMT
My only response to this post, is that I didn't realise that there were no repercussions for admins on all the ProBoards for allowing on their individual ProBoard. Good to know. If they feel that I'm allowing something I shouldn't, they'll let me know. If I don't comply, the repercussions for me are the same for everyone: They'll just close the forum. Let's talk about what's really going on here. You want Erjen gone, and Maya, too. You think you found the right ammo to accomplish that and I disagree. PB leaves things like this up to the discretion of the admins, but occasionally I disagree with them too. However, it is ultimately their decision. So call them up and we'll let them be the judge. I won't even argue. Remember what I said: It's a policy, not a weapon. OK. I am putting admin 'on ignore'. I am not comfortable with his aspersions.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 7:09:29 GMT
If they feel that I'm allowing something I shouldn't, they'll let me know. If I don't comply, the repercussions for me are the same for everyone: They'll just close the forum. Let's talk about what's really going on here. You want Erjen gone, and Maya, too. You think you found the right ammo to accomplish that and I disagree. PB leaves things like this up to the discretion of the admins, but occasionally I disagree with them too. However, it is ultimately their decision. So call them up and we'll let them be the judge. I won't even argue. Remember what I said: It's a policy, not a weapon. No. I am not now interested in the personalities Rules are rules.. Yup. Rules are rules. You think Erjen is breaking them and I don't. So file your appeal and let's get an official ruling. Who knows, you might actually end up free of both Erjen and Maya. After all, when one goes, the other will follow. I'll bet you knew that, too, huh?
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 7:18:18 GMT
No. I am not now interested in the personalities Rules are rules.. Yup. Rules are rules. You think Erjen is breaking them and I don't. So file your appeal and let's get an official ruling. Who knows, you might actually end up free of both Erjen and Maya. After all, when one goes, the other will follow. I'll bet you knew that, too, huh? It is interesting that you have swallowed their incessant demands against me. It says more about you than me. Seriously? Can you just look at what you just admitted? You are partisan. Meh! HELLOOOOOO! Because U object to Erjen saying Covid misinformation... suddenly I am going after Ergen and May?> I have not mentioned Maya for months. YOU are grouping them together NOT me!
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 7:23:23 GMT
Yup. Rules are rules. You think Erjen is breaking them and I don't. So file your appeal and let's get an official ruling. Who knows, you might actually end up free of both Erjen and Maya. After all, when one goes, the other will follow. I'll bet you knew that, too, huh? It is interesting that you have swallowed their incessant demands against me. It says more about you than me. Seriously? Can you just look at what you just admitted? You are partisan. Meh! There is nothing to swallow. This is an issue of rules, specifically whether or not Erjen's posts violate PB's covid policy. I'm not sure what you think I just said, but the bias here isn't coming from me. We both know that if Erjen was an atheist (or more accurately, not a Christian), you and I wouldn't be having this discussion.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 7:28:49 GMT
It is interesting that you have swallowed their incessant demands against me. It says more about you than me. Seriously? Can you just look at what you just admitted? You are partisan. Meh! There is nothing to swallow. This is an issue of rules, specifically whether or not Erjen's posts violate PB's covid policy. I'm not sure what you think I just said, but the bias here isn't coming from me. We both know that if Erjen was an atheist (or more accurately, not a Christian), you and I wouldn't be having this discussion. Yes. You are totally correct.
|
|
|
Post by Admin on Jul 16, 2020 7:37:06 GMT
There is nothing to swallow. This is an issue of rules, specifically whether or not Erjen's posts violate PB's covid policy. I'm not sure what you think I just said, but the bias here isn't coming from me. We both know that if Erjen was an atheist (or more accurately, not a Christian), you and I wouldn't be having this discussion. Yes. You are totally correct. Yes, I know. Because you would have never taken issue with it, at least not publicly. I think the real question here is which you care about the most: Stopping the spread of harmful covid misinformation, or getting Erjen banned.
|
|
|
Post by goz on Jul 16, 2020 7:45:20 GMT
Yes. You are totally correct. Yes, I know. Because you would have never taken issue with it, at least not publicly. I think the real question here is which you care about the most: Stopping the spread of harmful covid misinformation, or getting Erjen banned. The former.
|
|