|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 4, 2017 14:59:19 GMT
I was getting ready for work and running behind, but I wanted to say thanks before I left. I'm home now and I'm about to watch it. Sorry for the misunderstanding. If you want to believe what graham says I can't stop you, but you're making a mistake. Graham was 100% correct about you when he said "If you pay attention, he almost never actually says "I believe X because Y". He just says things are "interesting" and that he's "collating". The most you will get is a video with "parts are true" and "parts are not" - but not which parts are which. He's very careful never to say anything he'd have to defend." Ive also pointed it out a number of times. Yeah, direct answers and and solid stances ended back around the "What do you think climate change actually is?" era. The humorous guff caught from "CO2 is low. That's bad." was lengthy. After so many instances of "your answer demonstrates you've no idea what this topic is about" the answers got few and far between.
|
|
|
Post by Cinemachinery on May 4, 2017 15:01:50 GMT
Dude, surely you know that is never going to happen. Well...he is always going on about globalist agenda so I thought I should making him see a meaningful video based on some real stats. But it seems he just skipped it and replied as if he had watched it. There are no "real stats" in a conspiracy addiction. There are "stats I want to be the case" and "stats obviously put forward by the NWO/Masons/Etc.".
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 4, 2017 17:07:29 GMT
Aj, I slept eight or nine hours after watching the video you posted. Now I have to leave for work again in about an hour. No hurry. I understand you have other things to do, just like I do. I'm hoping that you did not start this thread just so the peanut gallery could have a go at me. Come on, you can do better than that. Unlike Ada, I don't feel that honor requires me to strike back every time I'm struck. In my first year on the old board I used to think it was so, but I learned and I changed my methodology, and Ada never did. I'll talk with you and anyone else who wants to discuss globalization. Hitler, graham, puvo, and Cine have each other, and they can talk to each other
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 4, 2017 17:29:03 GMT
I had a 12 hour flight between my last post and this. I will get back to this later as I am a bit too tired to think. But first can you please describe what do you think globalisation means?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 4, 2017 17:34:43 GMT
I had a 12 hour flight between my last post and this. I will get back to this later as I am a bit too tired to think. But first can you please describe what do you think globalisation means? Basically, it means homogenizing the human race under a single authority, whether they want it or not.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on May 4, 2017 17:55:15 GMT
Graham was 100% correct about you when he said "If you pay attention, he almost never actually says "I believe X because Y". He just says things are "interesting" and that he's "collating". The most you will get is a video with "parts are true" and "parts are not" - but not which parts are which. He's very careful never to say anything he'd have to defend." Ive also pointed it out a number of times. Yeah, direct answers and and solid stances ended back around the "What do you think climate change actually is?" era. The humorous guff caught from "CO2 is low. That's bad." was lengthy. After so many instances of "your answer demonstrates you've no idea what this topic is about" the answers got few and far between. The problem is that there are lots of misconceptions regarding globalisation. People should examine the issue and then form opinion on it. At the moment, far right political parties have spread absurd things about globalisation. Like some believe Rothschild family is behind "forced" globalisation.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on May 4, 2017 19:05:45 GMT
The flat earth society has members all over the globe. Nah, it should be, "The flat Earth society has member all around the globe". Damn, good spotting.
|
|
|
Post by gadreel on May 4, 2017 19:06:58 GMT
The flat earth society has members all over the globe. Instead of all over the globe, wouldn't they prefer that you say all over the map? Did you not get it?
|
|
|
Post by Jonesy1 on May 4, 2017 22:34:41 GMT
Graham was 100% correct about you when he said "If you pay attention, he almost never actually says "I believe X because Y". He just says things are "interesting" and that he's "collating". The most you will get is a video with "parts are true" and "parts are not" - but not which parts are which. He's very careful never to say anything he'd have to defend." Ive also pointed it out a number of times. The phrase "like nailing jelly to a wall" has never been more apt than when describing getting ErJen to actually admit what his thoughts are on a subject. Actually Erjen will tell you his thoughts on a subject, so long as it's a subject of his choosing.
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Jan 5, 2019 23:52:32 GMT
Actually, the title is a bit tricky. It is really contesting the claims of those who believe that the world is already globalised. As Professor Ghemawat pointed out the actual rate of globalisation is not very high and there are many myths surrounding this topic. For example, less than 10% of all investments in the world is Foreign direct investment. He also showed many other statistical proves that point out that the fear regarding globalisation is unfounded to a great extent. Glad that you liked it. Interesting. Sorry, I replied earlier before clicking on the video. I must leave soon but I'll watch this again when I get home, and I'll let you know if I agree with him or not. Did you finally watch the vid, ErJen?
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on Jan 6, 2019 0:34:01 GMT
Interesting. Sorry, I replied earlier before clicking on the video. I must leave soon but I'll watch this again when I get home, and I'll let you know if I agree with him or not. Did you finally watch the vid, ErJen? I don't remember. This thread is almost a year old. EDIT -- Okay, I started watching and remember now. Yes, I watched it.
|
|