maxwellperfect
Junior Member
@maxwellperfect
Posts: 3,966
Likes: 1,683
|
Post by maxwellperfect on Aug 16, 2020 17:51:01 GMT
....nevertheless?
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Aug 16, 2020 17:53:18 GMT
PLANET OF THE APES 1968 WHO FRAMED ROGER RABBIT
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 16, 2020 18:02:16 GMT
Kubricks Shining changes quite a bit from the book (the ending is completely different). Stephen King hated it and made his own more faithful version (TV miniseries that became forgotten)
|
|
|
Post by mattgarth on Aug 16, 2020 18:02:41 GMT
Peyton Place (1957) -- skipped the trash and made it come out almost uplifting
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 16, 2020 18:09:30 GMT
Many great Disney films take quite a few liberties from the source material. In the "Hunchback of Notre Dame" book, Esmerelda dies, and then the hunchback lies by her grave and slowly dies as well.
|
|
|
Post by gljbradley on Aug 16, 2020 18:16:09 GMT
Watchmen
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Aug 16, 2020 18:27:47 GMT
Psycho is the most obvious answer to me. Hitchcock and Joseph Stefano changed a great deal from the original novel.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Aug 16, 2020 18:32:37 GMT
An obvious one is The Godfather--a film classic that was produced from a turgid pulp novel. Jaws would be another.
|
|
|
Post by Raimo47 on Aug 16, 2020 18:33:24 GMT
Bram Stoker's Dracula Dracula (1958) The Lord of the Rings
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Aug 16, 2020 18:33:39 GMT
Frankenstein (1931) is way different from the book.
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Aug 16, 2020 18:35:04 GMT
An obvious one is The Godfather--a film classic that was produced from a turgid pulp novel. Jaws would be another. I attempted to read Jaws earlier this year, I couldn't make it through. Maybe I'll try again at some point.
|
|
|
Post by alpha128 on Aug 16, 2020 18:35:07 GMT
The film version of The Prestige (2006) omits the modern day framing story of the book, and makes some other changes. Christoper Priest, the novel's author, published a full-length book called The Magic in 2008 to give his detailed opinion on the movie. Priest wrote, "I liked what I liked much more than I disliked what I disliked, and found many scenes admirable. The opening is particularly effective, as is the presentation of some of the magic. There is sensitivity and skill throughout, but not flashy, show-off skill, as has been apparent in some of Nolan’s more recent films." I read the novel The Prestige, and own both the book and the film. Personally, I didn't miss the modern day framing story, and thought the film did an excellent job, as the structure of Priest's book would have made a more literal cinematic retelling difficult.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 16, 2020 18:35:41 GMT
I liked Spielberg’s version of The Lost World: Jurassic Park better than the Crichton book which just felt like a rushed effort.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Aug 16, 2020 18:41:33 GMT
An obvious one is The Godfather--a film classic that was produced from a turgid pulp novel. Jaws would be another. I attempted to read Jaws earlier this year, I couldn't make it through. Maybe I'll try again at some point. Skip the awkward and embarrassing sex scene between Hooper and Mrs. Brody, if you do.
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Aug 16, 2020 18:47:13 GMT
I attempted to read Jaws earlier this year, I couldn't make it through. Maybe I'll try again at some point. Skip the awkward and embarrassing sex scene between Hooper and Mrs. Brody, if you do. They don't have sex in the movie. Or if they do, we don't see it.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 16, 2020 18:53:04 GMT
Skip the awkward and embarrassing sex scene between Hooper and Mrs. Brody, if you do. They don't have sex in the movie. Or if they do, we don't see it. Of course they don’t have sex in the movie. Spielberg cut out that entire cheating subplot.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 16, 2020 18:55:08 GMT
Frankenstein (1931) is way different from the book. I don’t know if I’d call that a particularly great movie. The sequel is a lot better, although that one’s also partially based on the book.
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Aug 16, 2020 19:03:44 GMT
An obvious one is The Godfather--a film classic that was produced from a turgid pulp novel. Jaws would be another. One reviewer from the 1970s commented that the first half of The Godfather novel was pretty good but at some point Puzo stopped "writing" but kept on typing. The movie, however, sustains its value to the very end.
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Aug 16, 2020 19:15:27 GMT
A CLOCKWORK ORANGE. The book ends with Alex getting a redemption; the movie ends with him back to where he started. However, I felt this change made the story better, even though I'm not a pessimist in the slightest. Why do you think it's unfaithful? It's almost a shot-for-shot recreation of the panels.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Aug 16, 2020 19:17:41 GMT
Skip the awkward and embarrassing sex scene between Hooper and Mrs. Brody, if you do. They don't have sex in the movie. Or if they do, we don't see it. And that was probably the single best script decision made in the entire adaptation process.
|
|