|
|
Post by politicidal on Aug 25, 2020 16:43:13 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Aug 25, 2020 22:04:26 GMT
Looks like fun.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jep Gambardella on Aug 27, 2020 19:20:37 GMT
Cool. To be released on September 23rd. I will be watching it at some point for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by Jep Gambardella on Sept 29, 2020 15:36:31 GMT
I watched it on Sunday evening. I was in the mood for something light and fun and that's what I picked. It was a good choice for what I wanted, quite entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by taylorfirst1 on Sept 29, 2020 16:46:05 GMT
I also watched it on Sunday and enjoyed it. As I expected it's a well made family friendly adventure story. Not great but certainly good.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Sept 30, 2020 19:56:30 GMT
I gave it a chance but coudlnt make it padt the first 30 minutes for some reason.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Nov 1, 2020 20:44:36 GMT
ENOLA HOLMES is an entertaining and well-acted but overlong movie. It's supposed to teach the importance of intelligence and reasoning, but the title character at times over-explains (by talking to the camera) what should already be clear to anyone paying attention, ironically dumbing the scene down. There are overt anti-sexism messages, including Enola saying she doesn't want a husband. That could've been interpreted as "I think that love is an obstacle" (something her brother Sherlock would probably say) and/or "I want to remain a child," but no, she develops feelings for a viscount named Tewkesbury. Also, this 16-year-old seems happy when others look at her as an adult. Even Inspector Lestrade mistakes her for a 20-year-old. It's a good way to tackle feminism, because it shows that reaching maturity doesn't always have to do with a person's love life/sex life. A young woman accepts her beauty as an external factor, so she wants to share it with the world, without letting that define her more than her personality, intelligence and strength. She finds her own voice in a mostly misogynistic setting without claiming that all men are evil. In fact, Tewkesbury wasn't a love interest in the Nancy Springer book this is based on (he was actually younger), so I consider this change to be an improvement. Speaking of page-to-screen changes and of male characters portrayed in a positive light, Sherlock is now a caring brother. I'm sure this will piss fans off, but I don't think it's a radical departure from the Arthur Conan Doyle novels nor the many other adaptations. The reason why his anti-social behavior was always highlighted is because he didn't want to be an asshole; he wanted to be an emotionless genius. He wanted to come off as a misunderstood eccentric, but he didn't want to be completely alone. Besides, some of his previous incarnations had brief moments of vulnerability. And if this incarnation was going to lower his guard, why not with just 1 person? And why not a relative? And even then, there's still a distance. Sherlock tells Enola that he cares about her only once and he does so with a lot of hesitation. He never hugs her or kisses her and he never makes an effort to understand her point of view. He tries to make sure she's not in danger, but that's part of his profession. He does that with everyone else. For years, whenever I watched a scene where a criminal is trying to drown someone, I thought "Come on! Pretend to be dead and they'll leave you alone!" This movie actually does that (with Enola and the evil henchman Linthorn), so it immediately earned my respect. During the climax, Linthorn attacks Enola and she causes him to fall and die. All of this is too intense compared to the relatively tame violence in previous scenes. By the way, why doesn't it affect Enola? Even if it was in self-defense, being responsible for someone else's death should be a big deal, at least the first time. 7/10 ------------------------------------- You can read comments of other movies in my blog. |
|
