|
Post by Ass_E9 on Sept 7, 2020 15:12:14 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Sept 7, 2020 15:56:27 GMT
I don`t really have a preference, but i do generally buy paperback because they are cheaper.
|
|
|
Post by jackspicer on Sept 7, 2020 19:55:48 GMT
I would choose hardcover, since you're able to open the book all the way without folding/ruining the spine. Hardcovers are more expensive, but you can also re-sell them for more than you could re-sell a used paperback.
|
|
|
Post by femalefan on Sept 7, 2020 19:58:02 GMT
Hardcover.
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Sept 7, 2020 20:03:29 GMT
Hardcover
|
|
mmexis
Sophomore
@mmexis
Posts: 860
Likes: 732
|
Post by mmexis on Sept 7, 2020 20:15:56 GMT
I prefer hardcover, but usually buy whatever's cheaper (on those rare occasions that I buy) For gifts, I always buy hardcover.
|
|
bess1971s
Sophomore
@bess1971s
Posts: 399
Likes: 257
|
Post by bess1971s on Sept 9, 2020 15:10:25 GMT
Hardcovers are easier to read since the size of paperbacks was increased.
|
|
|
Post by theravenking on Sept 10, 2020 20:19:36 GMT
I hate those old low quality paperbacks where the font is often so small that you would need a magnifying glass to read the text.
I prefer the hardcover, but high quality paperbacks are good too. For example the paperbacks in The British Library Crime Classics series are really gorgeous.
|
|
|
Post by Zos on Sept 11, 2020 11:35:30 GMT
Hardback for anything I would be intending to keep for the collectable value and protection.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Sept 11, 2020 13:14:01 GMT
Paperback because they are lighter and easier to read in various positions. For instance, sometimes I like to lie on my side and read, and this is easier with a paperback.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 22, 2020 16:54:47 GMT
Paperback.
|
|
mrdanwest
Sophomore
@mrdanwest
Posts: 127
Likes: 76
|
Post by mrdanwest on Sept 24, 2020 19:02:40 GMT
I loathe cheap mass market paperbacks. But I prefer a quality paperback to hardcover because itβs lighter, itβs easier to handle, and it hurts a lot less when you drop it on your face when you fall asleep reading in bed.
|
|
|
Post by saucyjacky on Sept 25, 2020 14:18:11 GMT
Hardcover. I move around too frequently for paperbacks; they are often damaged no matter how carefully I handle their designated carrying cases.
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Oct 28, 2020 5:46:47 GMT
Most often paperback because it's cheaper to get.
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Oct 28, 2020 16:24:06 GMT
I think Hardcovers look much nicer on my shelf. I used to buy primarily paperbacks because most of my reading was done on a bus to and from work, and paperbacks are a lot easier to carry around.
|
|
|
Post by llanwydd on Oct 31, 2020 5:32:45 GMT
It matters little if at all. I take books out of the public library rather than buy them but if I ever buy one again I would prefer to save money.
|
|
|
Post by vegalyra on Nov 5, 2020 16:26:59 GMT
I prefer hardcover for new books, but I really love the old paperback artwork for books published in the 1950's through 1970's. Especially the old Penguin Classics published in the late 1960's and 1970's.
|
|
|
Post by nutsberryfarm π on Nov 29, 2020 2:27:08 GMT
Paperback, for the smell.
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Nov 30, 2020 2:01:12 GMT
I prefer hardcover for new books, but I really love the old paperback artwork for books published in the 1950's through 1970's. Especially the old Penguin Classics published in the late 1960's and 1970's. That's it. This is the reason why. Ever since I was 8 years old and read my very first Agatha Christie novel, "Evil Under the Sun" and the delicious artwork on the cover. This made a HUGE impression upon my psyche and remains to this day. Especially the pulp fiction from the 60s and early 70s, i just love it. For Dame Agatha artwork, my paperback preference is Pocketbook publications. I even love the font.
|
|
|
Post by dirtypillows on Nov 30, 2020 2:01:46 GMT
Paperback, for the smell. I totally get that.
|
|