|
Post by theravenking on Sept 10, 2020 20:12:16 GMT
Do you find it weird if an actor refuses to do love scenes altogether? Or is it okay, if it conflicts with their faith? I don’t mean sex scenes or nudity on screen just normal relatively harmless romantic scenes.
Patrick McGoohan might be the most extreme example. He constantly fought against any romantic element being introduced to The Prisoner and rumour has it that he turned down the James Bond role, because as a devout catholic he would’ve felt uncomfortable playing a womanizer.
Neal McDonough is another conservative Christian actor who has refused doing love scenes even though it cost him some high profile roles and led to him being relegated to playing villainous characters.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 10, 2020 20:28:52 GMT
Not always easy to be romantic/intimate on set when you have lights, cameras, personnel, etc. around you.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 10, 2020 20:31:37 GMT
Quite a few refuse to do them actually, a lot of nude/sex scenes often just use body doubles
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Sept 10, 2020 20:36:43 GMT
Ralph Macchio is like that, but it's not faith related. He just loves (fears?) his wife too much. That's why Daniel got friend-zoned in Karate Kid 3. I remember on Dancing With the Stars, he was constantly pissing his pants over dancing with another lady.
On that note, Jackie Chan didn't even have his first onscreen kiss until he was 48. Not counting whatever he did in those old adult films.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 10, 2020 20:45:17 GMT
Interesting trivia, Silvester Stallone's first movie was actually a porno that he only got like $100 for. Interestingly enough I don't think he did any nude scenes after that.
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Sept 10, 2020 21:04:44 GMT
Interesting trivia, Silvester Stallone's first movie was actually a porno that he only got like $100 for. Interestingly enough I don't think he did any nude scenes after that. Arnold Schwarzenegger did a soft core as did Cameron Diaz.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 10, 2020 21:04:47 GMT
Interesting trivia, Silvester Stallone's first movie was actually a porno that he only got like $100 for. Interestingly enough I don't think he did any nude scenes after that. What about The Specialist?
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Sept 10, 2020 21:08:45 GMT
Interesting trivia, Silvester Stallone's first movie was actually a porno that he only got like $100 for. Interestingly enough I don't think he did any nude scenes after that. What about The Specialist? Stallone also showed his bare ass when getting hosed down in First Blood.
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Sept 10, 2020 21:13:22 GMT
Interesting trivia, Silvester Stallone's first movie was actually a porno that he only got like $100 for. Interestingly enough I don't think he did any nude scenes after that. What about The Specialist? I'm sure he was willing to make an exception for Sharon Stone.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 10, 2020 22:13:40 GMT
What about The Specialist? I'm sure he was willing to make an exception for Sharon Stone. I'm sure any man would for early-to-mid 90's Sharon Stone.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 10, 2020 22:39:22 GMT
I'm sure he was willing to make an exception for Sharon Stone. I'm sure any man would for early-to-mid 90's Sharon Stone. Hell I think they still would for 2020 Sharon Stone.
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 11, 2020 20:58:28 GMT
Sharon Stone and Bruce Willis. Catherine Tramell and John McClane together.
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Sept 12, 2020 10:37:37 GMT
In FIREPROOF, there's a scene where the 2 protagonists kiss. Kirk Cameron asked for his wife to act as a double for the actress, and they filmed it in a way where you can only see the silhouettes.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Sept 12, 2020 12:19:57 GMT
Do you find it weird if an actor refuses to do love scenes altogether? Or is it okay, if it conflicts with their faith? I don’t mean sex scenes or nudity on screen just normal relatively harmless romantic scenes. Patrick McGoohan might be the most extreme example. He constantly fought against any romantic element being introduced to The Prisoner and rumour has it that he turned down the James Bond role, because as a devout catholic he would’ve felt uncomfortable playing a womanizer. Neal McDonough is another conservative Christian actor who has refused doing love scenes even though it cost him some high profile roles and led to him being relegated to playing villainous characters. In regard to the OP, it apparently wasn't so much devout Catholicism as uxorious devotion that caused McGoohan to spurn romantic roles (in fact, he openly and rather impatiently mooted the religious reason in a couple of older interviews; although he remained a faithful adherent of the church, he apparently felt some conflicts with his religion as well, as his work often expressed, albeit symbolically). He said more than once that he was uncomfortable with the notion of having his young daughters see him passionately kissing a woman who wasn't his wife, and also intimated that he'd seen enough marital breakups engendered among his colleagues by their becoming romantically involved with a co-star. In a couple of his early Rank Studios films he'd kissed his actress co-star--in fact in one of them he played an evil character who not only kisses the girl, but proceeds to attempt to rape her. And in his old Dangerman series, he wasn't above generating some erotic heat with a lovely lady, but it was always of the strictly flirtatious and hands-off variety. All in all, I don't think he was so much opposed to sex-suggestive scenes on moral grounds as much as on the grounds that most of those types of scenes were gratuitous, and often as not degrading to the women involved. Interestingly, Brooke Shields, who bared it all as a young pubescent in Pretty Baby, insisted on a body double for the nude scenes in Blue Lagoon when she was 14, but then went on to do nudity and fairly heated lovemaking scenes in Endless Love at age 15. As far as I know, she did no nudity or even particularly explicit love scenes after that film.
|
|
|
Post by theravenking on Sept 12, 2020 12:52:24 GMT
Do you find it weird if an actor refuses to do love scenes altogether? Or is it okay, if it conflicts with their faith? I don’t mean sex scenes or nudity on screen just normal relatively harmless romantic scenes. Patrick McGoohan might be the most extreme example. He constantly fought against any romantic element being introduced to The Prisoner and rumour has it that he turned down the James Bond role, because as a devout catholic he would’ve felt uncomfortable playing a womanizer. Neal McDonough is another conservative Christian actor who has refused doing love scenes even though it cost him some high profile roles and led to him being relegated to playing villainous characters. In regard to the OP, it apparently wasn't so much devout Catholicism as uxorious devotion that caused McGoohan to spurn romantic roles (in fact, he openly and rather impatiently mooted the religious reason in a couple of older interviews; although he remained a faithful adherent of the church, he apparently felt some conflicts with his religion as well, as his work often expressed, albeit symbolically). He said more than once that he was uncomfortable with the notion of having his young daughters see him passionately kissing a woman who wasn't his wife, and also intimated that he'd seen enough marital breakups engendered among his colleagues by their becoming romantically involved with a co-star. In a couple of his early Rank Studios films he'd kissed his actress co-star--in fact in one of them he played an evil character who not only kisses the girl, but proceeds to attempt to rape her. And in his old Dangerman series, he wasn't above generating some erotic heat with a lovely lady, but it was always of the strictly flirtatious and hands-off variety. All in all, I don't think he was so much opposed to sex-suggestive scenes on moral grounds as much as on the grounds that most of those types of scenes were gratuitous, and often as not degrading to the women involved. Interestingly, Brooke Shields, who bared it all as a young pubescent in Pretty Baby, insisted on a body double for the nude scenes in Blue Lagoon when she was 14, but then went on to do nudity and fairly heated lovemaking scenes in Endless Love at age 15. As far as I know, she did no nudity or even particularly explicit love scenes after that film. All very interesting. I didn't know about this. Thank you for clarifying things!
|
|
|
Post by SuperDevilDoctor on Sept 12, 2020 13:26:27 GMT
Do you find it weird if an actor refuses to do love scenes altogether? Or is it okay, if it conflicts with their faith? I don’t mean sex scenes or nudity on screen just normal relatively harmless romantic scenes. Patrick McGoohan might be the most extreme example. He constantly fought against any romantic element being introduced to The Prisoner and rumour has it that he turned down the James Bond role, because as a devout catholic he would’ve felt uncomfortable playing a womanizer. Neal McDonough is another conservative Christian actor who has refused doing love scenes even though it cost him some high profile roles and led to him being relegated to playing villainous characters. In regard to the OP, it apparently wasn't so much devout Catholicism as uxorious devotion that caused McGoohan to spurn romantic roles (in fact, he openly and rather impatiently mooted the religious reason in a couple of older interviews; although he remained a faithful adherent of the church, he apparently felt some conflicts with his religion as well, as his work often expressed, albeit symbolically). He said more than once that he was uncomfortable with the notion of having his young daughters see him passionately kissing a woman who wasn't his wife, and also intimated that he'd seen enough marital breakups engendered among his colleagues by their becoming romantically involved with a co-star. I seem to recall an interview with director David Cronenberg (or maybe it was one of the actors) from some years ago, about McGoohan working on the film SCANNERS... Cronenberg (?) said that while McGoohan was a marvelous actor, he was also a total pain in the ass to work with. At one point during the shoot, McGoohan tore into co-star Jennifer O'Neill, angrily calling her a "slut" and a "whore" (in front of the crew) because she had been divorced multiple times. O'Neill fled to her trailer in tears.
|
|
|
Post by mattgarth on Sept 12, 2020 18:35:20 GMT
Jim Caviezel refused to do any intimate bedroom scenes with screen wife Ashley Judd in HIGH CRIMES.
Nothing personal against Ashley -- just a religious thing.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Sept 13, 2020 0:15:04 GMT
In regard to the OP, it apparently wasn't so much devout Catholicism as uxorious devotion that caused McGoohan to spurn romantic roles (in fact, he openly and rather impatiently mooted the religious reason in a couple of older interviews; although he remained a faithful adherent of the church, he apparently felt some conflicts with his religion as well, as his work often expressed, albeit symbolically). He said more than once that he was uncomfortable with the notion of having his young daughters see him passionately kissing a woman who wasn't his wife, and also intimated that he'd seen enough marital breakups engendered among his colleagues by their becoming romantically involved with a co-star. I seem to recall an interview with director David Cronenberg (or maybe it was one of the actors) from some years ago, about McGoohan working on the film SCANNERS... Cronenberg (?) said that while McGoohan was a marvelous actor, he was also a total pain in the ass to work with. At one point during the shoot, McGoohan tore into co-star Jennifer O'Neill, angrily calling her a "slut" and a "whore" (in front of the crew) because she had been divorced multiple times. O'Neill fled to her trailer in tears. I'd never heard that particular story, but it seems true enough that he was sometimes difficult to work with, and apparently beset by some private demons. He seems, all in all, to have been a complex and complicated personality; perhaps not the type of personality that could easily fit into the demands of 'leading man' persona--which could be one major reason behind the fact that, magnetic and charismatic as he could be onscreen, stardom in films evaded him even though in all respects he might have appeared to be tailor-made for such stardom otherwise. I've read a lot about him, I find him a fascinating sort, someone who might have achieved more in his career if he hadn't been warring with the twin issues of his personal morality and philosophy and his apparent near total inability to let himself be molded by the starmaking machine.
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Sept 13, 2020 0:20:06 GMT
What about The Specialist? Stallone also showed his bare ass when getting hosed down in First Blood. Didn't Sly show his bare backside in 'Lock Up' and 'Tango & Cash'? Kurt Russell said at the time Stallone and Mel Gibson had it written into their contracts. Comedians quipped "so does Goldie Hawn"; but aside from 'There's A Girl In My Soup', Hawn showed her backside a lot in sexy underwear, not bare ... not that I've been paying much attention.
|
|
|
Post by gljbradley on Sept 13, 2020 1:02:29 GMT
What about The Specialist? Stallone also showed his bare ass when getting hosed down in First Blood. I think he also was nude in Part II during the extended torture sequence and in a shower scene in the film he did with Kurt Russell. Correct me if I'm wrong.
|
|