|
Post by johnspartan on Sept 14, 2020 16:25:18 GMT
CrepedCrusader's vehicle ![](https://img.memecdn.com/pedo-van_o_1328905.jpg) ...said the person who hasn't seen the movie. Kind of like the mob who never saw "Song of the South" but want it banned, anyway. Right?
|
|
|
Post by Jep Gambardella on Sept 14, 2020 16:25:32 GMT
If a male made this same film, would he get away it? It appears selective reasoning behind the exploitation in the theme, but the director will get a free pass because of her gender.
Also, if the director weren't black, CrepedCrusader wouldn't be defending the movie with such passion.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Sept 14, 2020 16:45:20 GMT
If a male made this same film, would he get away it? It appears selective reasoning behind the exploitation in the theme, but the director will get a free pass because of her gender.
Also, if the director weren't black, CrepedCrusader wouldn't be defending the movie with such passion. What you sound like: "Pretty soon, it's gonna be illegal to be white in this country!"
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Sept 14, 2020 16:46:37 GMT
...said the person who hasn't seen the movie. Kind of like the mob who never saw "Song of the South" but want it banned, anyway. Right? Nobody "banned" it. Disney buried it because they were embarrassed by it. I actually would like to see SotS. It's supposed to have some really good art.
|
|
|
Post by CrepedCrusader on Sept 14, 2020 16:47:20 GMT
You’re a weird dumb little dude. ...said the bandwagoneer.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Sept 14, 2020 16:49:50 GMT
You’re a weird dumb little dude. ...said tbe bandwagoneer. I have seen the movie. There’s definitely some questionable stuff in it.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Sept 14, 2020 17:00:17 GMT
I have seen the movie. There’s definitely some questionable stuff in it. Anything that isn’t already being posted on YouTube? I don’t know what is posted on YouTube. But those multiple ass/crotch close-ups were unnecessary.
|
|
|
Post by mortsahlfan on Sept 14, 2020 17:01:28 GMT
I'm as far left as you can go without being a Socialist, but I don't understand Democrats... One minute a female breast (even one with a husband's hand on a photo) is "exploitation" but not this shit? I hate political correctness, and I'm a free speech absolutist, but this isn't something I want to see. "I'll have you know I can be just as much as an ignorant idiot as the Right, m'kay?" You're pathetic.. Be a man and just say how you feel, instead of hiding behind a stupid quote.
Enjoy your "crusade"
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Sept 14, 2020 17:05:52 GMT
I question the whole trending list in general. I mean is The Office even on there? Doesn't everyone watch the office on netflix? I feel like for it not to be above Sister Sister or the Smurfs? Come on.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Sept 14, 2020 17:22:48 GMT
I don’t know what is posted on YouTube. But those multiple ass/crotch close-ups were unnecessary. Was it something that should get an X or NC-17 rating? I’m not sure, but it shouldn’t be in movies. I actually watched the movie wanting to defend it but some scenes are pretty much undefendable.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 14, 2020 17:32:04 GMT
I’m not sure, but it shouldn’t be in movies. I actually watched the movie wanting to defend it but some scenes are pretty much undefendable. Have you seen similar sexual exploitation of young girls on TV or movies and do you think the scenes were meant to titillate adult male viewers? en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dan_Schneider_%28TV_producer%29
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 14, 2020 17:34:22 GMT
Well let's see: NAMBLA is a nationwide organization child marriage is legal in several states one of the most popular forums on 4chan was the jailbait forum for the longest time the Catholic church has deal with pedohile scandals the Deep Web is rife with criminal actiivty, including child pornography I would say there's probably a decent sized market for this sort of thing. Again, you have to wonder what kind of audience were they hoping to attract with the original poster. Why is a pedophile going to watch a short segment in a movie of fully clothed girls doing a dance that anyone can post on YouTube? Probably because many of them aren't gonna be aware that it's just a short segment. Again, what kind of audience were they hoping to attract with the original poster? Or were they really just that naive and stupid and didn't realize the implications of what they were doing?
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 14, 2020 17:41:10 GMT
I don’t watch kids TV. Can you narrow this down a bit. Dan Schneider has a history of really innapropriate behavior and weird obssesion with young girl's feet. He was fired from Nickelodeon for "undisclosed reasons": I normally don't give in to these pedophile conspiracy theories (Pizzagate was idiotic) but there does seem to be enough incidents surrounding Schneider to at least point in a certain direction.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Sept 14, 2020 17:41:57 GMT
I’m not sure, but it shouldn’t be in movies. I actually watched the movie wanting to defend it but some scenes are pretty much undefendable. Have you seen similar sexual exploitation of young girls on TV or movies and do you think the scenes were meant to titillate adult male viewers? They were either meant to titillate pedophiles or to shock people. I mean the scenes would most likely titillate a pedophile who likes young girls and have the opposite effect on a normal person. I’m thinking the intent of the filmmakers was to shock people but the fact that those scenes would also probably arouse pedophiles who like young girls makes it wrong imo.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 14, 2020 17:53:38 GMT
Dan Schneider has a history of really innapropriate behavior and weird obssesion with young girl's feet. He was fired from Nickelodeon for "undisclosed reasons": So, there was no huge moral outrage over this man’s TV shows, but the network canned him without the people accusing him of sex exploitation. Here's the thing, do you believe the people screaming the loudest really care about the heart of subject? As far I can tell, they haven’t cared much until now. What has the Right or Left done about child sex trafficking? "but the network canned him without the people accusing him of sex exploitation.' Well no, he's been accused of sexual exploitation for quite some time, that's most likely why he was fired. "Here's the thing, do you believe the people screaming the loudest really care about the heart of subject?" I don't really know nor car about whose "screaming the loudest", that's a bit of a pivot, I'm not particularly interested in turning this into a politics issue, I'm just concerned with the the content of the movie and how it's exploiting sexualization of children. As another poster pointed out, there's some uncomfortable scenes that are pretty undefendable.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 14, 2020 18:05:09 GMT
"but the network canned him without the people accusing him of sex exploitation.' Well no, he's been accused of sexual exploitation for quite some time, that's most likely why he was fired. "Here's the thing, do you believe the people screaming the loudest really care about the heart of subject?" I don't really know nor car about whose "screaming the loudest", that's a bit of a pivot, I'm not particularly interested in turning this into a politics issue, I'm just concerned with the the content of the movie and how it's exploiting sexualization of children. As another poster pointed out, there's some uncomfortable scenes that are pretty undefendable. I'm not particularly interested in turning this into a politics issue Are you concerned that this movie is being used as a political morality test? "Are you concerned that this movie is being used as a political morality test? " I'm sure it is, but that doesn't really have anything to do with my concern (Is the movie exploiting child sexuality?). If people want to irreponsibly polticize this, well that's on them.
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Sept 14, 2020 18:07:26 GMT
They were either meant to titillate pedophiles or to shock people. I mean the scenes would most likely titillate a pedophile who likes young girls and have the opposite effect on a normal person. I’m thinking the intent of the filmmakers was to shock people but the fact that those scenes would also probably arouse pedophiles who like young girls makes it wrong imo. A pedophile can get aroused just looking at a fully clothed, non-twirking child, don’t you think. Maybe no children should appear in movies or TV since heterosexual men can’t control their libidos. This is the excuse Muslims give why women must worship behind them, because they can’t keep their minds on God with female ass in their face. I guess its not an excuse, men are very weak. True but those scenes were filmed in a way that accentuates the sexuality, like a sexy music video, which is what I find problematic.
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 14, 2020 18:10:21 GMT
"Are you concerned that this movie is being used as a political morality test? " I'm sure it is, but that doesn't really have anything to do with my concern (Is the movie exploiting child sexuality?). If people want to irreponsibly polticize this, well that's on them. Would you have known about this movie had it not been made a cause celeb by the Right? Actually the only reason I knew about this film was because one of favorite Youtubers, Vaush (a libertarian socialist) made a video about it: ![](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUG8D9a7kSY&t=111s)
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 14, 2020 18:32:14 GMT
Actually the only reason I knew about this film was because one of favorite Youtubers, Vaush (a libertarian socialist) made a video about it: ![](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BUG8D9a7kSY&t=111s) So do you think Netflix is trying to attract pedophile viewers and how large of a population do you think that is? And it was a voice of moral outrage from the left that brought this to your attention. "So do you think Netflix is trying to attract pedophile viewers and how large of a population do you think that is?" I think there is enough to point to in that direction (the original poster, the film title, the really innapropriate shots). As for how large of a population that is, I dunno (for obvious reasons it's very difficult to get stats on that as most people aren't willing to admit to that on a survey) but it should be noted there are several states where child marriage is legal and the Deep Web is a huge hive for pedophiles.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Sept 14, 2020 18:38:31 GMT
So do you think Netflix is trying to attract pedophile viewers and how large of a population do you think that is? And it was a voice of moral outrage from the left that brought this to your attention. "So do you think Netflix is trying to attract pedophile viewers and how large of a population do you think that is?" I think there is enough to point to in that direction (the original poster, the film title, the really innapropriate shots). As for how large of a population that is, I dunno (for obvious reasons it's very difficult to get stats on that as most people aren't willing to admit to that on a survey) but there are several states where child marriage is legal and the Deep Web is a huge hive for pedophiles. Netflix would have no reason to assume that the pedo crowd would make for a lucrative market. The states where child marriage is legal are a holdover from the old days. Very few people nowadays would actually support the idea of child marriage.
|
|