|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 30, 2020 20:08:31 GMT
Which was a worse casting choice?
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 30, 2020 20:10:00 GMT
Sounds to me like Jesse was worse. Like he was just annoying while Arnold was at least entertainingly ridiculous.
|
|
|
|
Post by Spike Del Rey on Sept 30, 2020 21:24:55 GMT
Arnold was a fine casting choice; unfortunately WB had decided to go full-on camp with the franchise by then.
|
|
|
|
Post by Reynard on Sept 30, 2020 22:06:22 GMT
Arnold wasn't miscast at all, he was just given really hopeless dialogues to deliver. I would have loved to see him play Mr Freeze in a serious Batman movie.
Eisenberg was really out of control.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamesbamesy on Sept 30, 2020 22:07:11 GMT
Both performances were quite bad, but in concept, Arnold was the better casting.
|
|
|
|
Post by marth on Sept 30, 2020 22:15:19 GMT
And the worst is...  |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 30, 2020 22:39:34 GMT
Eisenberg. Schwarzenegger could had been interesting casting in a less campy movie. Like if he played Freeze like a Terminator.
|
|
|
|
Post by kolchak92 on Sept 30, 2020 22:40:59 GMT
How come Eisenberg's Lex Luthor always gets singled out, but no one cares about Kevin Spacey's spectacularly bland and boring version of the character?
|
|
|
|
Post by CoolJGS☺ on Sept 30, 2020 22:42:40 GMT
I thought Arnold was fine in the context of a crappy campy Batman movie.
Jesse Eisenberg sucks regardless of the movie intent.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Sept 30, 2020 23:12:34 GMT
To play devil's advocate for a minute, which is more unbelievable, Eisenberg as a corrupt billionaire genius or Arnold Schwarzenegger as a top cryogenicist?
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 30, 2020 23:16:43 GMT
To play devil's advocate for a minute, which is more unbelievable, Eisenberg as a corrupt billionaire genius or Arnold Schwarzenegger as a top cryogenicist? Well audiences had to buy Arnold as a pregnant scientist a few years prior to Batman. If they were able to do that, then playing a top cryogenist wouldn't be so far-fetched for them.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 30, 2020 23:20:54 GMT
To play devil's advocate for a minute, which is more unbelievable, Eisenberg as a corrupt billionaire genius or Arnold Schwarzenegger as a top cryogenicist? Interesting trivia, did you know Dolph Lundgren actually used to be a well educated chemist? He even got a scholarship to MIT.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 30, 2020 23:24:49 GMT
To play devil's advocate for a minute, which is more unbelievable, Eisenberg as a corrupt billionaire genius or Arnold Schwarzenegger as a top cryogenicist? Well audiences had to buy Arnold as a pregnant scientist a few years prior to Batman. If they were able to do that, then playing a top cryogenist wouldn't be so far-fetched for them. They weren't though.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 30, 2020 23:27:53 GMT
To play devil's advocate for a minute, which is more unbelievable, Eisenberg as a corrupt billionaire genius or Arnold Schwarzenegger as a top cryogenicist? Interesting trivia, did you know Dolph Lundgren actually used to be a well educated chemist? He even got a scholarship to MIT. Yup, and yet he wouldn't be believable playing that in a movie. Paradox. 
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on Sept 30, 2020 23:43:17 GMT
Eisenberg was an annoying little douchebag so he was worse. However, he was cast to be the typical millennial and he was that for sure.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 30, 2020 23:47:02 GMT
Jesse Eisenberg is worse casting for the character he is suppose to be playing.
I wish they would make a Superman movie where Lex Luthor isn't a ham.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Sept 30, 2020 23:53:14 GMT
lol
"used to be a well educated chemist"
Now he's a brain fried actor
|
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Oct 1, 2020 3:00:09 GMT
Jesse Eisenberg as Lex Luthor was the worst. He carried no menace or gravitas. At least Mr. Freeze played to Arnold's strengths as a comedic actor.
|
|
|
|
Post by DarkManX on Oct 1, 2020 5:01:07 GMT
How come Eisenberg's Lex Luthor always gets singled out, but no one cares about Kevin Spacey's spectacularly bland and boring version of the character? Kevin Spacey might have been good were he able to give it his own spin. As it is Bryan Singer made a Richard Donner film and Spacey had to act like Gene Hackman as best he could.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ransom on Oct 9, 2020 10:47:29 GMT
How come Eisenberg's Lex Luthor always gets singled out, but no one cares about Kevin Spacey's spectacularly bland and boring version of the character? Because Eisenberg was spectacularly wrong for the role and looked like an ill kid going up against both Batman and Superman? While Kevin didn't? |
|
