Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2020 1:35:51 GMT
caught this last night. the movie still isn't bad but it feels dated. it feels academic, not because of the writing, but because of the cinematics, which makes me wonder if a reboot might work, but probably not. i left halfway through because i've seen it so many times. Dark Knight was definitely better.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Oct 6, 2020 2:21:11 GMT
....“Feels academic”?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2020 2:44:28 GMT
Yeah. The shots and cinematic storytelling were all good but it didn't have the flow of today's films, so it felt more like reading a textbook than a novel.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Oct 6, 2020 8:57:22 GMT
I think TESB is closer to a novel and modern movies are closer to graffiti scribbled in a washroom stall.
|
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Oct 6, 2020 8:58:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Spike Del Rey on Oct 6, 2020 12:44:22 GMT
You lost any credibility you might have had with that statement.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 6, 2020 14:07:00 GMT
I think TESB is closer to a novel and modern movies are closer to graffiti scribbled in a washroom stall. and which of these is more interesting? |
|
|
|
Post by Prime etc. on Oct 6, 2020 17:20:42 GMT
and which of these is more interesting? Graffiti can be unreadable and confusing, or scribbled by a mentally ill person. Wow this is more appropriate to describe movies of today than I realized!
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Oct 6, 2020 18:53:11 GMT
When people use the word dated when it comes to movies/tv shows i stop taking them seriously.
|
|
|
|
Post by shannondegroot on Oct 7, 2020 0:33:18 GMT
Yeah. The shots and cinematic storytelling were all good but it didn't have the flow of today's films, so it felt more like reading a textbook than a novel. A New Hope (1977) and The Phantom Menace (1999) "flow" better because they are sweeping adventure stories, the rest of the Star Wars saga are meant to finish up the story lines created by the first parts of each trilogy and aren't as "flowing" as the former films.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on Oct 7, 2020 0:53:36 GMT
Yeah. The shots and cinematic storytelling were all good but it didn't have the flow of today's films, so it felt more like reading a textbook than a novel. A New Hope (1977) and The Phantom Menace (1999) "flow" better because they are sweeping adventure stories, the rest of the Star Wars saga are meant to finish up the story lines created by the first parts of each trilogy and aren't as "flowing" as the former films. have you seen TESB lately? Theres something old fashioned about the way its shot and edited. I wasn't feeling it this time. I almost wished there was more of Lucas retro cgi put in there. |
|
