|
|
Post by Carl LaFong on Nov 15, 2020 10:37:54 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Zos on Nov 15, 2020 11:50:27 GMT
Is it a valid question is maybe the more important point. Why should a sportsman even need to be considered "moral"? and what is morality apart from some vague notion of "goodness," would the paper judge people being in sport if they had children out of marriage or same sex relationships? They wouldn't even dare mention it, so why should morality even be bought up in relation to sport.
As for Hamilton, when he condemns Saudi Arabia loudly and wears a T shirt about their human rights abuses next time he is racing there and enjoying their hospitality and glad handing Saudi royals, then perhaps I can take his BLM bandwagon jumping with anything other than utter contempt.
|
|
|
|
Post by nogbad on Nov 15, 2020 12:41:38 GMT
Ooh, that's a tricky one... oh wait, it isn't. No. He's a cunt.
|
|
|
|
Post by mecano04 on Nov 16, 2020 3:16:56 GMT
Is it a valid question is maybe the more important point. Why should a sportsman even need to be considered "moral"? and what is morality apart from some vague notion of "goodness," would the paper judge people being in sport if they had children out of marriage or same sex relationships? They wouldn't even dare mention it, so why should morality even be bought up in relation to sport. Reminds me of:
and Barkley's explanation about why he did it:
|
|
