AND THEY SAY CHRISTIANS ARE TOO SENSITIVE

Way to miss the point gf, and deliberately so. It is just being obtuse to ignore what I have already commented on about the DIFFERENCE'S between Islam, Christianity, and I will throw Judaism into the same melting pot, compared to the rest and then pretend there is no difference. Superiority of belief in a creator God creates nothing but conflict and the tyranny of many wars have been shrouded by these religious orders.  

I thought Christianity was all about humility, putting others before yourself, loving your enemies, and riding donkeys.

In the Jesus way, I suppose.

The story is that Jesus Christ rode into town on a donkey and you're saying Christianity is about superiority.

Is "tyrant" a term of endearment?

By all means, no sugar coating.

I think 'tyrant' is just fine for the point you were making.

Humanism isn't atheistic per se, the idea is that religion is unnecessary for the flourishing of human virtue. But one can be both humanist and religious. One can even be an overtly secular humanist and yet believe in God. Though many secular humanists are atheists, some quite militantly so.

Many of the pre-Marxist communists were religious - Thomas More was a Catholic saint who was also a communist and a humanist! Marx was an atheist but it was a very different atheism from the likes of Richard Dawkins. Marx argued that religious belief grew not out of ignorance, but out of class warfare - the ruling class clung to religion to justify their power (think of the divine rule of kings) while the underclass clung to religion as a source of hope that a more just world would come about. Marx believed that religion would naturally wither away as class conflict was addressed.

Marxists have varied in their attitudes to religion. Some have been atheist but have left religion alone to "wither away". Some have sought to actively eliminate religion and some have actually encouraged religion (Stalin for example initially persecuted the Orthodox Church but later encouraged it).

And then of course, liberation theology married Marxist ideas with Christian concepts of liberation. It flourished in South and Central America though the US has done its best to try and stamp it out.

Modern communists continue to have a very mixed attitude to religion. In my experience, the Trotskyists and Left Communists tend to be more hostile to religion than the Marxist-Leninists. But regardless of views on how to handle religion, atheism is still very common outside of liberation theology.

As for communism and LGBT rights - again it's a very mixed bag. Engels seems to have been at least something of a homophobe but there's no evidence Marx was. Soviet Russia decriminalised homosexuality - the first modern country to do so. But oppressive laws against LGBT people still existed in some of the other socialist republics. Stalin later recriminalised it - about the same time he started promoting the Orthodox Church.

Cuba has had a lot of historical hostility to homosexuality - predating the revolution. It has become more tolerant since the 1990s. Completely contrary to what happened in the USSR, tolerance of LGBT people came at a time of increased tolerance of religion there.

Most modern communists are pro-LGBT, often linking oppression of LGBT people to class conflict. While homophobia amongst communists (at least in the west) is near non-existent now, there is some transphobia in some communist circles who take the side of the liberal second-wave feminists in seeing trans rights in opposition to women's rights. These are definitely a minority in the communist movement though.

That's cool! You haven't really given me much input to work with.