|
|
Post by ReyKahuka on Dec 14, 2020 20:58:43 GMT
Because of their weak division, right? Or was it their strong division? I forget. That has nothing to do with it. The Saints are a pretender. Not a contender. Everything is not about the Patriots sdm3. Quite obsessing. The Patriots benefitted for years for playing in the weakest division. Get over it. I know you're oblivious in general, but sdm is a Colts fan and does not like the Patriots.
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Dec 14, 2020 21:25:37 GMT
Because of their weak division, right? Or was it their strong division? I forget. That has nothing to do with it. The Saints are a pretender. Not a contender. Everything is not about the Patriots sdm3. Quite obsessing. The Patriots benefitted for years for playing in the weakest division. Get over it. Yet this year they don't seem to benefit from being in a weak division? Yet last year the Saints were in a division with 3 sub .500 teams. New England's division opponents actuality finished with more wins than the Saints' division opponents. The year before that? Saints were in a division with 3 sub. 500 teams. Remind us how the Saints benefitted from their weak division in 2018 and 2019. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 14, 2020 22:03:22 GMT
That has nothing to do with it. The Saints are a pretender. Not a contender. Everything is not about the Patriots sdm3. Quite obsessing. The Patriots benefitted for years for playing in the weakest division. Get over it. Yet this year they don't seem to benefit from being in a weak division? Yet last year the Saints were in a division with 3 sub .500 teams. New England's division opponents actuality finished with more wins than the Saints' division opponents. The year before that? Saints were in a division with 3 sub. 500 teams. Remind us how the Saints benefitted from their weak division in 2018 and 2019. I don't have to. You see it. That's why they farted out of the playoffs 3 years in a row. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 14, 2020 22:06:57 GMT
That has nothing to do with it. The Saints are a pretender. Not a contender. Everything is not about the Patriots sdm3. Quite obsessing. The Patriots benefitted for years for playing in the weakest division. Get over it. I know you're oblivious in general, but sdm is a Colts fan and does not like the Patriots. Doesn't matter. The "weak division cause and effect" concept is too difficult for him to understand. He could be a Coco Chanel fan. He still wouldn't get it. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 14, 2020 22:44:46 GMT
Here is my recap and analysis of Week 14’s games. [...] Any thoughts? What about the Pats? Anyway: I think it is save by now to say that the Steelers aren't as strong as many though they were - they had rather mediocre or minor opponents (not their fault), and if they had a play off contenders, they were severely crippled like the Ravens (also not their fault). They are not garbage, but I guess any other play off participant can beat them with some luck. The Chiefs are still the team to beat. Good to see Brady winning, and I'm also rooting a bit for the Redskins. Could be a true underdog story of a reborn hero (=> Smith, his injury, and this return). I like the Redskins because I like their uniforms. And I feel sorry for them being that the "hate the white man" movement forced them to change their mascot. |
|
|
|
Post by FrankSobotka1514 on Dec 14, 2020 23:03:33 GMT
What about the Pats? Anyway: I think it is save by now to say that the Steelers aren't as strong as many though they were - they had rather mediocre or minor opponents (not their fault), and if they had a play off contenders, they were severely crippled like the Ravens (also not their fault). They are not garbage, but I guess any other play off participant can beat them with some luck. The Chiefs are still the team to beat. Good to see Brady winning, and I'm also rooting a bit for the Redskins. Could be a true underdog story of a reborn hero (=> Smith, his injury, and this return). I like the Redskins because I like their uniforms. And I feel sorry for them being that the "hate the white man" movement forced them to change their mascot. So a team with a name that is offensive to native Americans had to change their name because people hate white people? |
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Dec 14, 2020 23:05:59 GMT
Yet this year they don't seem to benefit from being in a weak division? Yet last year the Saints were in a division with 3 sub .500 teams. New England's division opponents actuality finished with more wins than the Saints' division opponents. The year before that? Saints were in a division with 3 sub. 500 teams. Remind us how the Saints benefitted from their weak division in 2018 and 2019. I don't have to. You see it. That's why they farted out of the playoffs 3 years in a row. So is it results based? If you are a bad team, and your team makes the playoffs and shits the bed, was it your poor division that helped you make the playoffs, or shit the bed? And if you're a good team, and your team makes the playoffs and goes to the superbowl, was it your poor division that helped you make the superbowl? What about those years when the Patriots division opponents have good records? Is that still considered a weak division? 2019? 2017? 2016? 2015? 2014? 2013? All those years there were 3 or 4 other divisions where the division winners had easier divisions than the Patriots. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 14, 2020 23:19:54 GMT
I like the Redskins because I like their uniforms. And I feel sorry for them being that the "hate the white man" movement forced them to change their mascot. So a team with a name that is offensive to native Americans had to change their name because people hate white people? I could possibly understand "Redskins". But now they're going after the Cleveland Indians. www.cbssports.com/mlb/news/cleveland-indians-to-change-team-name-here-are-some-of-the-best-options-including-spiders-and-rockers/The Redskins were proud to call themselves the Redskins. It was used in a complimentary fashion. They weren't called the Washington Stupid Idiots. Add that to the tearing down statues of Christopher Columbus, Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson, etc. And it's just a bunch of white hating assholes destroying public property based on ignorance and hate. images.app.goo.gl/Cc4DGJhjfktnHpsz5 |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 14, 2020 23:22:58 GMT
I don't have to. You see it. That's why they farted out of the playoffs 3 years in a row. So is it results based? If you are a bad team, and your team makes the playoffs and shits the bed, was it your poor division that helped you make the playoffs, or shit the bed? And if you're a good team, and your team makes the playoffs and goes to the superbowl, was it your poor division that helped you make the superbowl? What about those years when the Patriots division opponents have good records? Is that still considered a weak division? 2019? 2017? 2016? 2015? 2014? 2013? All those years there were 3 or 4 other divisions where the division winners had easier divisions than the Patriots. Good teams in bad divisions benefit from being in a bad division. If you don't understand that, don't worry about it. There is probably many things you don't understand. Some people can run. Some people can only walk. We still love you. |
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Dec 15, 2020 1:02:20 GMT
This is it ... time for the Cleveland Browns to take on their nemesis, the Baltimore Ravens. The Ravens stomped all over the Browns in the 1st week of the season and are coming off the back of a victory, needing a win.
The Browns will need everything they've got a bit of luck to hang with the Ravens here, but this is what it's all about, and the game is finally at kick-off time.
Go Browns!!
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Dec 15, 2020 2:25:30 GMT
So is it results based? If you are a bad team, and your team makes the playoffs and shits the bed, was it your poor division that helped you make the playoffs, or shit the bed? And if you're a good team, and your team makes the playoffs and goes to the superbowl, was it your poor division that helped you make the superbowl? What about those years when the Patriots division opponents have good records? Is that still considered a weak division? 2019? 2017? 2016? 2015? 2014? 2013? All those years there were 3 or 4 other divisions where the division winners had easier divisions than the Patriots. Good teams in bad divisions benefit from being in a bad division. If you don't understand that, don't worry about it. There is probably many things you don't understand. Some people can run. Some people can only walk. We still love you. Ok. But the Patriots weren't in a bad division in those years I mentioned, nor were they in a bad division in many other years. I mean, that's what the numbers say. But if you don't understand numbers, I won't hold it against you. Some people can count, some people can't. We still love you. With 0 superbowl appearances in recent years, I'm having trouble understanding how the Saints benefitted from being in a weak division. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 15, 2020 4:04:44 GMT
Good teams in bad divisions benefit from being in a bad division. If you don't understand that, don't worry about it. There is probably many things you don't understand. Some people can run. Some people can only walk. We still love you. Ok. But the Patriots weren't in a bad division in those years I mentioned, nor were they in a bad division in many other years. I mean, that's what the numbers say. But if you don't understand numbers, I won't hold it against you. Some people can count, some people can't. We still love you. With 0 superbowl appearances in recent years, I'm having trouble understanding how the Saints benefitted from being in a weak division. The Saints benefited from being in a weak division by easily being able to win that division with little or no pressure from the other division teams. Just like the Patriots did when they were in a weak division. |
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Dec 15, 2020 4:11:10 GMT
Ok. But the Patriots weren't in a bad division in those years I mentioned, nor were they in a bad division in many other years. I mean, that's what the numbers say. But if you don't understand numbers, I won't hold it against you. Some people can count, some people can't. We still love you. With 0 superbowl appearances in recent years, I'm having trouble understanding how the Saints benefitted from being in a weak division. The Saints benefited from being in a weak division by easily being able to win that division with little or no pressure from the other division teams. Just like the Patriots did when they were in a weak division. Which year were they in a weak division? |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 15, 2020 4:53:36 GMT
The Saints benefited from being in a weak division by easily being able to win that division with little or no pressure from the other division teams. Just like the Patriots did when they were in a weak division. Which year were they in a weak division? Who? The Saints or the Patriots? |
|
|
|
Post by ReyKahuka on Dec 15, 2020 13:50:10 GMT
Which year were they in a weak division? Who? The Saints or the Patriots? Allow me to step in. I already broke this down last year, remember? And let's keep in mind the Patriots lost at home last year in week 17 to the Dolphins (because billychuck's defense couldn't stop a 3-12 team from marching down the field and scoring a TD in the closing seconds), which cost the Pats a bye. After all this, let me know which season you think the Patriots benefitted from their division. Better yet, explain why they benefit from their division when they beat every other division at the same clip. Come up with an actual argument, it's all I ask.
|
|
|
|
Post by hehatesshe on Dec 15, 2020 14:27:03 GMT
Which year were they in a weak division? Who? The Saints or the Patriots? As Rey said, what year were the Patriots in a weak division. Try to make a logical argument. |
|
|
|
Post by bluerisk on Dec 15, 2020 19:12:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 15, 2020 19:29:33 GMT
Who? The Saints or the Patriots? Allow me to step in. I already broke this down last year, remember? And let's keep in mind the Patriots lost at home last year in week 17 to the Dolphins (because billychuck's defense couldn't stop a 3-12 team from marching down the field and scoring a TD in the closing seconds), which cost the Pats a bye. After all this, let me know which season you think the Patriots benefitted from their division. Better yet, explain why they benefit from their division when they beat every other division at the same clip. Come up with an actual argument, it's all I ask. In 2018-19 the Patriots were the only team in the AFC East that had a winning record. |
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Dec 15, 2020 19:30:46 GMT
Who? The Saints or the Patriots? As Rey said, what year were the Patriots in a weak division. Try to make a logical argument. In 2018-19 the Patriots were the only team in the AFC East that had a winning record. |
|
|
|
Post by ReyKahuka on Dec 15, 2020 19:30:57 GMT
Is it? Article says 2016. Regardless, it's bullshit. Then there's this. Do you think this list of entire tribes and native organizations is a better representation of how native peoples feel about the name, as opposed to people called at random who may not even be Native American?
|
|
