|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 16, 2017 10:16:21 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 16, 2017 10:29:57 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 17, 2017 7:11:18 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Mar 17, 2017 17:55:49 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 18, 2017 12:10:48 GMT
Yogi adithyanath front runner for CM of UP? What the fuck?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Mar 18, 2017 12:24:16 GMT
I was once a member and actually a moderator of a large UP politics community in orkut days. I still remember this heated topic which generated a lot of fury among many.
" Gorakhpur main rehna hai to Yogi yogi kehna hai".
I really loved my orkut days. I was just as interested in politics as you are now or probably even more. The orkut was the place you would have loved. I was active on Brahmin community, Hinduism community, UP politics and a couple of other high traffic boards.
|
|
|
|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Mar 18, 2017 14:20:27 GMT
well, he is the CM. the guy is a psycho.
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Mar 18, 2017 14:23:06 GMT
well, he is the CM. the guy is a psycho. If he is the cm then it is a shame. |
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 18, 2017 14:59:35 GMT
well, he is the CM. the guy is a psycho. If he is the cm then it is a shame. How do you know the guy is a psycho? And how is it a shame? He is younger than Akhilesh Yadav. He is a 5-time MP from Gorakhpur and an entirely self-made man. He is the most popular leader in UP. Do you guys realize it is him who knows UP more than anyone else? Also, do you realize he is THE ONE who can bring law and order in a goonda-ridden state? The liberal lynch mob in Delhi is once to out to get a man who doesn't speak English, who doesn't follow "liberal sharia" and denies kid-glove treatment to the minorities? Secularism is a western concept and seculars ruled India for 60 long years and they failed. The only times India had some development was when people strongly believed in Dharma like Vajpayee, PV Narasimha Rao and Modi. Poorvanchal is the most backward area in UP and he finally brought some development there. Don't write him off too soon. He is THE DONALD TRUMP of India except that he is self-made, leads a life of austerity, strong Dharmic credentials above all with true commitment to UP. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Mar 18, 2017 15:08:56 GMT
If he is the cm then it is a shame. How do you know the guy is a psycho? And how is it a shame? He is younger than Akhilesh Yadav. He is a 5-time MP from Gorakhpur and an entirely self-made man. He is the most popular leader in UP. Do you guys realize it is him who knows UP more than anyone else? Also, do you realize he is THE ONE who can bring law and order in a goonda-ridden state? The liberal lynch mob in Delhi is once to out to get a man who doesn't speak English, who doesn't follow "liberal sharia" and denies kid-glove treatment to the minorities? Secularism is a western concept and seculars ruled India for 60 long years and they failed. The only times India had some development was when people strongly believed in Dharma like Vajpayee, PV Narasimha Rao and Modi. Poorvanchal is the most backward area in UP and he finally brought some development there. Don't write him off too soon. He is THE DONALD TRUMP of India except that he is self-made, leads a life of austerity, strong Dharmic credentials above all with true commitment to UP. Well....He is a criminal. I don't have problem with a Hindi speaking guy. I didn't have problems George Fernandes or Nitish Kumar (without lalu) or one those Cm's of Madhya Pradesh. As for how do I know if he has been criminal before? That's like asking how do I know Lalu Yadav is corrupt. As for Trump, Trump has proven nothing. Trump's victory was more a need for change. But such people don't last forever. Installing people like Adityanath may feel nice but won't necessarily prove nice in the long run. |
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 18, 2017 15:24:28 GMT
How do you know the guy is a psycho? And how is it a shame? He is younger than Akhilesh Yadav. He is a 5-time MP from Gorakhpur and an entirely self-made man. He is the most popular leader in UP. Do you guys realize it is him who knows UP more than anyone else? Also, do you realize he is THE ONE who can bring law and order in a goonda-ridden state? The liberal lynch mob in Delhi is once to out to get a man who doesn't speak English, who doesn't follow "liberal sharia" and denies kid-glove treatment to the minorities? Secularism is a western concept and seculars ruled India for 60 long years and they failed. The only times India had some development was when people strongly believed in Dharma like Vajpayee, PV Narasimha Rao and Modi. Poorvanchal is the most backward area in UP and he finally brought some development there. Don't write him off too soon. He is THE DONALD TRUMP of India except that he is self-made, leads a life of austerity, strong Dharmic credentials above all with true commitment to UP. Well....He is a criminal. I don't have problem with a Hindi speaking guy. I didn't have problems George Fernandes or Nitish Kumar (without lalu) or one those Cm's of Madhya Pradesh. As for how do I know if he has been criminal before? That's like asking how do I know Lalu Yadav is corrupt. As for Trump, Trump has proven nothing. Trump's victory was more a need for change. But such people don't last forever. Installing people like Adityanath may feel nice but won't necessarily prove nice in the long run. You know Lalu is a criminal because, situation in Bihar has been terrible under his rule. It was jungle raj as they used to say and he was eventually defeated. But such similar words have never been heard from Gorakhpur or its populace. In fact they say he is truly committed to development. Why is that we should always bow under the pressure from self-confessed guardians of liberalism, who entirely failed to take even the minorities forward? While I agree that Modi opponents could get enough ammo to attack BJP and I will hear a few more opinions before I pass my final judgement. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Mar 18, 2017 15:34:29 GMT
Did I tell you that I was a member of a large UP politics community? Back in 2007-09, GKP was one of the worst places of UP along with Azamgarh. Yogi was nothing good back then. Why do you believe that questioning a Hindu right wing leader is like bowing to liberals? I have zero to no regards for Indian liberals, Indian communists and India elites. I have been speaking against the likes of Prakash Karat and Sitaram Yechury for all my life. I have hated channels like NDTV to the extent that I stopped watching and adding revenue to them for as long as I can remember. I will pass my judgement against Yoginath based on what I perceive him. The problem with you is that you believe all other people are under influence of Indian liberals. That's not the case with me. If he comes off good then I will change my stance.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 18, 2017 15:51:36 GMT
What is the meaning of this?
|
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Mar 18, 2017 15:54:01 GMT
It means if you have to live in Gorakhpur then you have to sing Yogi yogi (means sing his praise). That was the chant of his supporters.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 18, 2017 16:28:17 GMT
Like I said, I would still like to hold my final judgement. I am yet hear from my usually trusted non-partisan people. But from what I have seen, even those who oppose Hindutva have said Yogi Adityanath is a good choice for CM.
I am hearing entirely something different on Twitter even from those handles that call themselves neutral about Yogi Adityanath.
And by the way, I am not saying YOU are bowing to liberal pressure but in general, those of us who don't fall for liberal narrative should give it a thought before we pass our final judgement.
|
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 19, 2017 2:50:19 GMT
It means if you have to live in Gorakhpur then you have to sing Yogi yogi (means sing his praise). That was the chant of his supporters. I'm sorry, aj. I don't find any consensus on Twitter/Reddit/facebook that Yogi is a criminal. Unlike Lalu where there is a generalized consensus and I'm yet to find a single supporter of Lalu Prasad Yadav anywhere on internet. In fact there is criticism from usual circles and some suspicion from center of right circles, but I find huge support for Yogi from most Modi supporters. In fact, this lady who criticized BJP for admitting ND Tiwari and many such missteps of the party, is now a huge supporter of Yogi and welcomes the decision.
To be honest I don't know intentions of most people on twitter and if they are truly tolerant of all faiths or if they would truly stand against our country becoming a communalized tinderbox. But taking at the face value, they do look like most twitter Modi supporters value the diversity of India while advocating softcore Hindutva. And I hope theyknow that if our country becomes communal, it would harm our development agenda. |
|
|
|
Post by Aj_June on Mar 19, 2017 2:58:42 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Kal_1993 on Mar 19, 2017 3:56:02 GMT
.
Sad that you are saying this. NOT EVEN ONCE did I say you are being influenced by media. You said yourself that you don't follow Indian politics, let alone watch news channels. So why would I say such a thing?
Anyways, in days to come we will see about this Yogi. For now I'm enjoying liberal meltdown.
|
|
|
|
Post by pimpinainteasy on Mar 19, 2017 6:46:54 GMT
jeez!
|
|
|
|
Post by RickSanchez on Mar 21, 2017 4:34:27 GMT
|
|
