|
|
Post by hi224 on Mar 4, 2021 21:59:10 GMT
Any thoughts on her fate.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Mar 4, 2021 23:08:48 GMT
I don't think it was the parents. I know they acted sketchy as hell, but I believe it was either a local pedophile or some other creep that killed her.
|
|
|
|
Post by clusium on Mar 5, 2021 1:23:28 GMT
I don't think it was the parents. I know they acted sketchy as hell, but I believe it was either a local pedophile or some other creep that killed her. Yeah, that's what I believe too.
|
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on May 3, 2021 23:31:03 GMT
John E. Douglas worked the case personally, and yeah I know he wasn't always right, but I don't think his belief they were innocent is bias, he knew Edmund Kemper, he liked Kemper, and he openly admitted Kemper did all the things he confessed to. Reading his take on it in the book The Cases that Haunt Us, he made a lot of points I never thought about, because the narrative I always heard never mentioned them. The note. Why would the mother of all people write this note and choose a word like 'behead', which aside from a couple sci-fi TV shows, was seldom even used in the 90s?
Now in more recent years, I've seen a few comments on Youtube I find credible, that an intruder could've been in the house, could've waited patiently in the house, not just that night, maybe for a while. We hear stories in the news woman finds out a man's been living in her attic for months, etc., so if that could happen today, it could sure as hell happen in the 90s before everybody had a camera watching everything. Stake the place out, learn the family's schedule, and just wait for the right time to kill the little girl. It might be farfetched, but it's sure as hell not impossible, as John Douglas pointed out, the note was not written haphazardly, somebody took time and was not rushed or panicked, to write it all out.
|
|
|
|
Post by hi224 on May 4, 2021 0:09:27 GMT
John E. Douglas worked the case personally, and yeah I know he wasn't always right, but I don't think his belief they were innocent is bias, he knew Edmund Kemper, he liked Kemper, and he openly admitted Kemper did all the things he confessed to. Reading his take on it in the book The Cases that Haunt Us, he made a lot of points I never thought about, because the narrative I always heard never mentioned them. The note. Why would the mother of all people write this note and choose a word like 'behead', which aside from a couple sci-fi TV shows, was seldom even used in the 90s? Now in more recent years, I've seen a few comments on Youtube I find credible, that an intruder could've been in the house, could've waited patiently in the house, not just that night, maybe for a while. We hear stories in the news woman finds out a man's been living in her attic for months, etc., so if that could happen today, it could sure as hell happen in the 90s before everybody had a camera watching everything. Stake the place out, learn the family's schedule, and just wait for the right time to kill the little girl. It might be farfetched, but it's sure as hell not impossible, as John Douglas pointed out, the note was not written haphazardly, somebody took time and was not rushed or panicked, to write it all out. what are the most damning pieces of varied evidence you'd say?.
|
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on May 4, 2021 3:12:17 GMT
John E. Douglas worked the case personally, and yeah I know he wasn't always right, but I don't think his belief they were innocent is bias, he knew Edmund Kemper, he liked Kemper, and he openly admitted Kemper did all the things he confessed to. Reading his take on it in the book The Cases that Haunt Us, he made a lot of points I never thought about, because the narrative I always heard never mentioned them. The note. Why would the mother of all people write this note and choose a word like 'behead', which aside from a couple sci-fi TV shows, was seldom even used in the 90s? Now in more recent years, I've seen a few comments on Youtube I find credible, that an intruder could've been in the house, could've waited patiently in the house, not just that night, maybe for a while. We hear stories in the news woman finds out a man's been living in her attic for months, etc., so if that could happen today, it could sure as hell happen in the 90s before everybody had a camera watching everything. Stake the place out, learn the family's schedule, and just wait for the right time to kill the little girl. It might be farfetched, but it's sure as hell not impossible, as John Douglas pointed out, the note was not written haphazardly, somebody took time and was not rushed or panicked, to write it all out. what are the most damning pieces of varied evidence you'd say?.
It's been a few years since I read the book, aside from the facts about the note, I'd have to refresh my memory on the subject.
Something else he pointed out though, that I always keep in mind when reading about murder cases, killers often want someone ELSE to discover the body, they arrange it that someone else will find the body first when there're other people on the scene, the dad found her himself during the police search of the house.
|
|
|
|
Post by ShadowSouL: Padawan of Yoda on Sept 19, 2021 5:44:25 GMT
Google "jonbenet ramsey pineapple".
The most shocking video footage I've seen of the case is the police interrogation regarding pineapple.
That was revealed, among a whole bunch of other things, like the Ramseys' 911 call that night, in one of several documentaries and specials that aired during the 20th anniversary of the case.
|
|
