|
|
Post by wmcclain on Apr 8, 2021 16:50:02 GMT
Murder by Decree (1979), directed by Bob Clark. The black carriage trundles through the convincingly dark, dank, filthy streets of Whitechapel. We get glimpses of the shining, staring eyes of the madman. Jack the Ripper is at work, killing and mutilating prostitutes under the noses of the helpless police. Why don't they call in Sherlock Holmes? Because were he to solve the case, he might bring down not only the Government, but the Monarchy itself. It seems natural to bring Holmes and the Ripper together, but AC Doyle never did so. Maybe it would have been in bad taste at the time. These days Sherlock Holmes has been absorbed into the fantasy/action genre, but this film is very much in the traditional vein, closer to the texts. The ageless Christopher Plummer is spot-on as the brainy Holmes, tormented this time by the injustice of the authorities and his own culpability in the horrific death of one of the women. James Mason is a satisfying Watson: loyal and stuffy, but not a fool. Combining the traditional Holmes with grimy London and bloody crime is a nice approach: the steadfastness of the detective comforts us while the Ripper terrifies us. The mutilations are mostly just suggested, but that's enough. The glimpses of Mary Kelly's agonies through a dirty window are hard to bear. Problems: - It's done with a limited budget, but you can also see they get good value from it. The director likes large sets, but uses locations and models, too.
- The dialogue tends to explain the plot, although maybe that's appropriate for a Holmes mystery.
- That Holmes would consult a psychic seems absurd, but AC Doyle did take that sort of thing seriously in later years.
- After the action climax we have 15 minutes of summing up.
From Hell (2001) has a similar plot, done with more splatter. The films are probably independent; this solution -- one of many -- to the mystery (Freemasons, royal secrets) had been established earlier. The DVD has a commentary track by the director, and also a PDF of the screenplay: "Sherlock Holmes and Saucy Jack". No proper subtitles, but it has old-style closed-captions, useless for most people in the HDMI age. When available I extract them, convert to SRT and embed them in a MKV version of the title. 
|
|
|
|
Post by Dramatic Look Gopher on Apr 8, 2021 17:00:45 GMT
Christopher Plummer and James Mason are a delight as the Holmes/Watson team, and the story is quite absorbing. Bob Clark uses a similar visual style as he did with Black Christmas. There are certainly some moments of genuine creepiness to be found here.
|
|
|
|
Post by Isapop on Apr 8, 2021 18:00:35 GMT
James Mason the best Watson ever.
|
|
|
|
Post by phantomparticle on Apr 8, 2021 22:15:37 GMT
The basic story, based on a notorious book that has been debunked, attempts to link the Crown Prince to the murders.
It is beautifully acted by Plummer and Mason but both are upstaged by Genevieve Bujold as a prostitute who has been shut away in a mental institution because she has the secret of the Ripper's identity.
Reginald H. Morris's cinematography and the musical score by Paul Zaza and Carl Zittrer turn the grimy streets of London's East End into a claustrophobic labyrinth of darkness and lurking death.
Arguably the best Holmes-Ripper movie of them all.
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperDevilDoctor on Apr 9, 2021 3:06:52 GMT
Good movie.
But Sherlock Holmes should never cry.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 9, 2021 16:34:28 GMT
Another one I should revisit. I did watch it but remember not liking it that much.
|
|
|
|
Post by phantomparticle on Apr 9, 2021 23:15:21 GMT
I agree for the most part, but I can forgive Plummer for his reaction, standing at the door for one last look at Bujold in the middle of the Snake Pit and knowing what she has sacrificed.
|
|
|
|
Post by nogbad on Apr 10, 2021 11:11:25 GMT
It's a film I've watched many times over many decades, so I guess I enjoy it well enough. Yet somehow it's not entirely satisfying, falling just short of greatness in a way I can't quite put my finger on. And it's not just my Donald Sutherland phobia. It's low-budget Britishness doesn't have quite the same charm as in the perhaps quite similar A Study In Terror.
|
|
|
|
Post by divtal on Apr 10, 2021 18:20:43 GMT
Wmcclain, thank you! I think I've heard the title, but I know that I've not seen it. I love Sherlock Holmes, and I'm fascinated with "Jack" (easy for me to say, living in the 20th/21st centuries).
I'm off to look for it.
|
|