|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Apr 11, 2021 1:35:36 GMT
Like someone touching you physically. In general. Do you?
|
|
|
|
Post by Spitfire926f on Apr 11, 2021 1:36:36 GMT
Love it. I'm a hugger and a snuggler. It's one of my love languages.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Apr 11, 2021 1:40:26 GMT
I don`t like to be touched.
|
|
|
|
Post by autumn on Apr 11, 2021 1:40:42 GMT
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by alpineflower on Apr 11, 2021 2:18:14 GMT
I usually like it
|
|
|
|
Post by Nora on Apr 11, 2021 2:37:39 GMT
I love it and its a love language to me too and I think its also a healing property for me. I never understood how people can Not like it. My explanation was that either they have to have issues with their own body or they are on the spectrum /facing a sensory overload. Not saying it is bad not enjoying touch. Just that for me its something hard to imagine. I have this also with swimming/being in water. Absolutely dont comprehend how someone could Not love that. For some reason Its easier for me to imagine someone not liking sex or food than touch or water I wonder how these likes/dislikes are formed in the brain.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman 猫的主人 on Apr 11, 2021 12:55:28 GMT
By random people? Hell no.
By people known and loved? Hell yes.
|
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Apr 11, 2021 13:09:49 GMT
Up to a point. I’m ticklish to a point where it’s almost a disability so be careful when you touch me.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Apr 11, 2021 13:53:48 GMT
Absolutely if it's from a hot woman.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 11, 2021 14:00:06 GMT
Like someone touching you physically. In general. Do you? Yes. But like most people, it depends on why, where and by whom.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 11, 2021 14:01:11 GMT
I'm not surprised. After your anti male obsessive ranting and raving displayed on "The Queen's Gambit" thread. It makes perfect sense.
|
|
|
|
Post by autumn on Apr 11, 2021 14:43:00 GMT
I'm not surprised. After your anti male obsessive ranting and raving displayed on "The Queen's Gambit" thread. It makes perfect sense. You weren't reading my posts carefully enough. I stated quite clearly that you were making comments about a teenagers body, in a movie that had nothing to do with her body. The movie was about a traumatized orphan on the spectrum who was a savant. If you watch the movie closely, she seemed to also have problems being touched. In a movie about chess, a cerebral movie in a male-dominated cold war period piece, talking the pros and cons of a teenager's body is creepy. Especially so when you felt it was your duty to explain this to us as a middle-aged man, educating young women. In The Queen's Gambit, this young woman's body is irrelevant to the core of the movie. I wasn't the only one who called you to task about your need to dwell on her body. I also clearly stated that if you were watching a movie about, for example, burlesque, or something where women's adult bodies were knowingly on display for pleasure, your comments dissecting their physical attractiveness to you would have some validity. It would make more sense for you to comment on their physical appearance because there would be context, as it was thematically part of the plot.
|
|
|
|
Post by autumn on Apr 11, 2021 14:45:08 GMT
By random people? Hell no. By people known and loved? Hell yes. This is what it comes down to. I'm very touch-sensitive. Strangers, or someone I'm not involved with? No. My partner, or hugging my closest friends? Yes. Random touching is a no-no.
|
|
|
|
Post by marianne48 on Apr 11, 2021 15:38:34 GMT
No. I grew up as the youngest sibling in my family (some were a decade or more older), so I had to put up with their casual abuse as well as an abusive parent. Also, back then it was still considered acceptable for adults (even strangers) to approach young children and touch them (pinching their cheeks, picking them up and tossing them in the air, wrapping their batwing arms around them in suffocating hugs, etc.) So I developed a lifelong flinch to unexpected touching.
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 11, 2021 15:55:20 GMT
I'm not surprised. After your anti male obsessive ranting and raving displayed on "The Queen's Gambit" thread. It makes perfect sense. You weren't reading my posts carefully enough. I stated quite clearly that you were making comments about a teenagers body, in a movie that had nothing to do with her body. The movie was about a traumatized orphan on the spectrum who was a savant. If you watch the movie closely, she seemed to also have problems being touched. In a movie about chess, a cerebral movie in a male-dominated cold war period piece, talking the pros and cons of a teenager's body is creepy. Especially so when you felt it was your duty to explain this to us as a middle-aged man, educating young women. In The Queen's Gambit, this young woman's body is irrelevant to the core of the movie. I wasn't the only one who called you to task about your need to dwell on her body. I also clearly stated that if you were watching a movie about, for example, burlesque, or something where women's adult bodies were knowingly on display for pleasure, your comments dissecting their physical attractiveness to you would have some validity. It would make more sense for you to comment on their physical appearance because there would be context, as it was thematically part of the plot. As I said before, you are conflating two different issues. I was commenting on the appearance of an adult actress. I never commented on the physical appearance --- in a sexual or romantic way --- of a teenager or child. Professional adult actresses are fair game. Anya Taylor Joy is an adult. That is obvious to normal people. Only people who are paranoid and obsessed with mistreatment, and disrespect of women, would see that where it doesn't exist. Nothing I said was disrespectful to women, perverted or creepy. Only someone with paranoid obsessive delusions would think there was.
|
|
|
|
Post by autumn on Apr 11, 2021 16:43:51 GMT
You weren't reading my posts carefully enough. I stated quite clearly that you were making comments about a teenagers body, in a movie that had nothing to do with her body. The movie was about a traumatized orphan on the spectrum who was a savant. If you watch the movie closely, she seemed to also have problems being touched. In a movie about chess, a cerebral movie in a male-dominated cold war period piece, talking the pros and cons of a teenager's body is creepy. Especially so when you felt it was your duty to explain this to us as a middle-aged man, educating young women. In The Queen's Gambit, this young woman's body is irrelevant to the core of the movie. I wasn't the only one who called you to task about your need to dwell on her body. I also clearly stated that if you were watching a movie about, for example, burlesque, or something where women's adult bodies were knowingly on display for pleasure, your comments dissecting their physical attractiveness to you would have some validity. It would make more sense for you to comment on their physical appearance because there would be context, as it was thematically part of the plot. As I said before, you are conflating two different issues. I was commenting on the appearance of an adult actress. I never commented on the physical appearance --- in a sexual or romantic way --- of a teenager or child. Professional adult actresses are fair game. Anya Taylor Joy is an adult. That is obvious to normal people. Only people who are paranoid and obsessed with mistreatment, and disrespect of women, would see that where it doesn't exist. Nothing I said was disrespectful to women, perverted or creepy. Only someone with paranoid obsessive delusions would think there was. The character she was playing was an underage teenager, and her body's appearance and whether you found it pleasurable or exciting to look at is a completely irrelevant factor to a movie about a chess prodigy and her experience as an orphan and a savant in the cold war. I was not the only one who found your comments about her body, but the fact you made it your priority to discuss it in your "series review" rather unsettling, should tell you something. Don't forget your comments where you said you felt it was your duty to inform women about this. *shudder*
|
|
|
|
Post by movieliker on Apr 11, 2021 17:18:08 GMT
As I said before, you are conflating two different issues. I was commenting on the appearance of an adult actress. I never commented on the physical appearance --- in a sexual or romantic way --- of a teenager or child. Professional adult actresses are fair game. Anya Taylor Joy is an adult. That is obvious to normal people. Only people who are paranoid and obsessed with mistreatment, and disrespect of women, would see that where it doesn't exist. Nothing I said was disrespectful to women, perverted or creepy. Only someone with paranoid obsessive delusions would think there was. The character she was playing was an underage teenager, and her body's appearance and whether you found it pleasurable or exciting to look at is a completely irrelevant factor to a movie about a chess prodigy and her experience as an orphan and a savant in the cold war. I was not the only one who found your comments about her body, but the fact you made it your priority to discuss it in your "series review" rather unsettling, should tell you something. Don't forget your comments where you said you felt it was your duty to inform women about this. *shudder* Don't delude yourself. Only Vits agreed. And he and I disagree all the time. Of all the posters on that thread and board, nobody chimed in supporting you. Teenagers past puberty are very sexual. More so than adults over thirty. A 17 year old teenager is for all practical purposes an adult. And most teenage girls are very interested in romance and sex. And most love the attention of adult males. And unless they were victims of sexual abuse or assault, they love being seen as physically attractive. So don't project your paranoia on them. You need help.
|
|
|
|
Post by uncreative on Apr 11, 2021 17:45:38 GMT
Only in certain places. One in particular
|
|
|
|
Post by novastar6 on Apr 11, 2021 17:50:29 GMT
Depends on by who and how. I think I more like the idea of it to the actual thing.
|
|
|
|
Post by Ass_E9 on Apr 11, 2021 20:15:17 GMT
|
|