|
|
Post by JudgeJuryDredd on May 8, 2021 18:24:31 GMT
Question, why is such a described horrific activity an exclusive only to QAnon conspiracy theories? The world is a pretty messed up place in a lot more circles than we would like to admit and it wouldn't surprise me if there are some really sick people who commit such criminal activity. You do not necessarily have to subscribe to a conspiracy theorist group to believe certain things, and as a reminder the film in which Caviezel is taking part in is based on true events and he is portraying an actual person, with whom he had several discussions with in preparation for their role and in fact was offered the role by them personally. And I do not believe the film is a politically left or right leaning sort of picture as again Mira Sorvino, a Democrat who has expressed criticism at one Donald Trump and the Republican party, is the female lead. Now I recognize Caviezel was discussing the film at an event hosted by a Conservative news outlet, that Tim Ballard, with whom the film is about, appears right leaning politically and that Caviezel himself appears to be right leaning politically also. But Caviezel also appears quite in good friendships with several left leaning types, and again a left leaning type is the female lead of the film, and while I can understand some would call him and the whole subject insane given that Caviezel one point in the interview says that such a production is difficult to be made in their industry because there are some powerful behind the scenes types who allegedly take part in similar activity(I don't know about draining the blood of youth but human trafficking definitely) wouldn't want it out there but honestly after the whole Jeffrey Epstein and Harvey Weinstein explosions of recent memory should such a thing really be seen as too far fetched and be described as being rooted in just political rhetoric? Human trafficking shouldn't be a right or left sort of issue, its pretty terrible and should be stopped. That part is correct, but as for the rest of the above, you generated a ton of verbiage to defend Caviezel from his making of unfounded accusations and spewing them at a convention of rightwing mental cases, presumably largely in the interests of promoting his next film project. I fail to see how either he--or you--can imagine this is in any way furthering the cause of preventing human trafficking. "right wing mental cases", whelp, that says it all there that this conversation isn't going to go very many places. Film is a powerful tool and can shed light on certain issues, as has been the case going back beyond a century.
|
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on May 8, 2021 20:33:26 GMT
That part is correct, but as for the rest of the above, you generated a ton of verbiage to defend Caviezel from his making of unfounded accusations and spewing them at a convention of rightwing mental cases, presumably largely in the interests of promoting his next film project. I fail to see how either he--or you--can imagine this is in any way furthering the cause of preventing human trafficking. "right wing mental cases", whelp, that says it all there that this conversation isn't going to go very many places. Film is a powerful tool and can shed light on certain issues, as has been the case going back beyond a century. Nice evade.
|
|
