|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on Apr 27, 2021 18:56:30 GMT
Which one out of these.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Apr 27, 2021 19:04:46 GMT
The Beatles
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Apr 27, 2021 19:05:43 GMT
The Beatles, but I love both.
|
|
|
|
Post by jcush on Apr 27, 2021 19:47:54 GMT
The Beatles of course, but I'm a huge fan of Wings. McCartney is my favorite musician.
|
|
|
|
Post by millar70 on Apr 27, 2021 20:47:33 GMT
I have absolutely no problem with Wings at all, fantastic music.
But we're talking about The Beatles here, sorry but they always win.
|
|
|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on Apr 30, 2021 4:06:02 GMT
I like the beatles more, out of these. But i also like Wings and some solo Paul albums.
But i'm just sayin' he should have probably stopped making music at about ten years into his solo career. Because after that point he's actually doing more harm than good.
I suppose he didn't have the foresight , to be predict that all future music from him would suck after the early eighties. But i'll say one thing, that i could do without.
And that is this, i could do without all his music made after around 1981.
And i'm not even saying i hate his solo career at all, it's just:
He stayed around far too long.
|
|
|
|
Post by TheGoodMan19 on Apr 30, 2021 5:13:59 GMT
I like the beatles more, out of these. But i also like Wings and some solo Paul albums. But i'm just sayin' he should have probably stopped making music at about ten years into his solo career. Because after that point he's actually doing more harm than good. I suppose he didn't have the foresight , to be predict that all future music from him would suck after the early eighties. But i'll say one thing, that i could do without. And that is this, i could do without all his music made after around 1981. And i'm not even saying i hate his solo career at all, it's just: He stayed around far too long.Most do. The Stones haven't put out a quality album since Steel Wheels, an outstanding one sine Tattoo You. The Who were mediocre since Moon died. Etc, etc. But every album means a tour and tours are where bands make money. Look at what the Stones make off their tours, lousy albums or no. Sir Paul is no exception.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Apr 30, 2021 16:01:39 GMT
I like the beatles more, out of these. But i also like Wings and some solo Paul albums. But i'm just sayin' he should have probably stopped making music at about ten years into his solo career. Because after that point he's actually doing more harm than good. I suppose he didn't have the foresight , to be predict that all future music from him would suck after the early eighties. But i'll say one thing, that i could do without. And that is this, i could do without all his music made after around 1981.
And i'm not even saying i hate his solo career at all, it's just: He stayed around far too long. You mean Paul McCartney ? Yeah i agree with that, his music in the 70s (and 60s with the Beatles obviously) is pretty good. But after that not so much.
|
|
|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on May 5, 2021 4:09:50 GMT
I suppose one reason why wings could be better, is of course much of their songs aren't as played out as the beatles. Just saying.
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on May 5, 2021 11:13:33 GMT
I suppose one reason why wings could be better, is of course much of their songs aren't as played out as the beatles. Just saying. You are just wrong.
|
|
|
|
Post by NJtoTX on May 6, 2021 1:44:27 GMT
Wings is ok, but I prefer his pre-Wings stuff like Ram.
|
|
