|
|
Post by Sarge on May 9, 2021 2:12:12 GMT
So "White Supremacy" and the "Marxist Critical Race Theory" seems to be one and the same. Is that correct?
I didn't get a notification you replied. I'm not sure it's "marxist," but yeah, it's all one and the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on May 25, 2021 2:19:01 GMT
It doesn’t mean anything today just like the word “racist” lost its meaning. Maybe it meant something, but the way I see White supremacy being used doesn’t make sense in the way TWITTARDS are using it.
If white supremacy DOES exist, very little of it does. I think people just need to stop using the terms Racist and White supremacist because they’ve lost the meaning.
|
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on May 25, 2021 14:05:13 GMT
Thanks spooner5020
As I said in a previous post "Population is determined by demographic distribution." So whichever race is the most populous in a given country obviously has the political supremacy. To turn this into racism is simply ridiculous.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2021 14:43:46 GMT
The tip of the iceberg
|
|
|
|
Post by Spitfire926f on May 25, 2021 15:21:15 GMT
Thanks spooner5020 As I said in a previous post "Population is determined by demographic distribution." So whichever race is the most populous in a given country obviously has the political supremacy. To turn this into racism is simply ridiculous. It's basic sociology. White privilege exists in white majority countries. It's true of any ethnic majority in any country. While racists certainly exist, the two issues have become conflated. |
|
|
|
Post by alfromni on May 25, 2021 15:39:10 GMT
My earlier remark..."So whichever race is the most populous in a given country obviously has the political supremacy"...is not strictly true. There have been occasions in empires where a minority ruled. Rhodesia (now Zimbabwe) for example. But even there I don't think that racism was called so much into question as power itself. South Africa of course was distinctly racist.
|
|
