King Kong (2005) vs. King Kong (1933) Jun 30, 2021 8:16:39 GMT Quote Select PostDeselect PostLink to PostMemberGive GiftBack to Top Post by darkreviewer2013 on Jun 30, 2021 8:16:39 GMT 1933 is simply a work of art.The 2005 version, while a decent updating of the source material, is overly long and self-indulgent. Not a bad film, but no classic either.