|
|
Post by phantomparticle on Jul 9, 2021 23:00:20 GMT
I was always intrigued by silent films as a kid, even though they were almost non existent on television in the 1950's. It was the horror fanzines of that era and their articles on silent horror films in Famous Monsters of Filmland and Castle of Frankenstein that cemented my desire to actually see those amazing movies. Now I have a decent collection spanning all genres and there is Youtube with its vast archive from Roundhay Garden Scene to the end of the era.
Not sure why so many are so hostile to silent movies. Whenever I see a silent or find photographs of that time, I can't help thinking that was the world of my parents and grandparents, and often feel if I'm sharing a part of their memories.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mulder and Scully on Jul 10, 2021 3:24:16 GMT
No.
They're too dated and silent for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marv on Jul 10, 2021 3:38:24 GMT
I don’t think I do. I tried a few of the more notorious ones and I just don’t find them enjoyable enough to seek out more.
|
|
|
|
Post by gw on Jul 10, 2021 3:48:42 GMT
I've enjoyed many but I didn't like The Kid and I couldn't make it through Faust.
|
|
|
|
Post by alittlebirdie on Jul 10, 2021 8:32:34 GMT
Not really. I have a friend that watches them almost exclusively, and from all different countries. We have little to talk about film wise
|
|
|
|
Post by petrolino on Jul 10, 2021 15:08:36 GMT
Yes. I feel they offer a unique viewing experience and are often rich in visual detail. I don't think filmmaking has advanced all that far beyond the techniques pioneered by film's early innovators, though advancements in technology and the equipment made available to filmmakers continue to open doors.
Best of all, some silents are just entertaining and showcase the work of magnificent performers, no different to sound movies. For example, I could watch Buster Keaton and Harold Lloyd's comedies all day.
|
|