|
|
Post by wmcclain on Jul 28, 2021 20:15:38 GMT
Stage Fright (1950), directed by Alfred Hitchcock. Gullible young actress attempts to help an inept fugitive -- who may be a murderer -- because she has a big crush on him. She goes deep undercover -- keeping many plates spinning -- and tries to get the goods on diva Marlene Dietrich, which is notoriously hard to do. This lesser-known Hitchcock film is difficult to summarize. On the one hand it seems right at the center of his natural mythology, with all the usual fleeing and chasing tropes supporting a romantic thriller with a little comedy. Actors trying to be effective in the real world can be funny, as in To Be or Not to Be (1942). On the other, the parts really don't come together and we are left without much to remember. You can't say Jane Wyman is miscast, but she is perhaps too serious for this sort of role. The fugitive is unsympathetic and the police detective who becomes the romantic lead is not as cunning as we might hope. Alastair Sim, playing Wyman's father, gives the standout performance here. It is as if he steps outside the picture to critique it: Neither Hitchcock nor Truffaut liked him in the film. In their interviews both are pretty merciless to this title. Notoriously, the film employs a "false flashback" near the beginning which lies to the viewer about what actually happened. Although subjective truth can be used in films -- see Rashomon (1950) -- we don't expect it in this sort of murder mystery. Available on DVD. No sign of a Blu-ray at the moment. 
|
|
|
|
Post by marianne48 on Jul 28, 2021 22:27:22 GMT
I do like "Lovely Ducks," though.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Jul 28, 2021 22:39:05 GMT
It’s a middle-tier Hitchcock film for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by phantomparticle on Jul 29, 2021 0:21:44 GMT
I've seen it but don't remember a frame of the movie. It was made during his low period in the early fifties before he hit his stride with Rear Window and Dial M For Murder.
Will have to give it another look.
|
|
|
|
Post by mikef6 on Jul 29, 2021 0:33:20 GMT
Stage Fright (1950), directed by Alfred Hitchcock. Notoriously, the film employs a "false flashback" near the beginning which lies to the viewer about what actually happened. Although subjective truth can be used in films -- see Rashomon (1950) -- we don't expect it in this sort of murder mystery. "Lying flashbacks" are used all the time even in modern movies, for example, J. Edgar, but no one says a word about them. Not major Hitch (I call him "Hitch") but very entertaining.
|
|
|
|
Post by marshamae on Jul 29, 2021 1:21:12 GMT
This is my favorite mid range hitchcock.
I am really surprised at the comments about the cast. JANE wyman is the least engaging and it’s too bad she is in the center of the film, but it almost makes sense to have a calm center, and she is supposed to be overwhelmed by the people she is dealing with. MArlene Deitrich and RICHARD TODD are not terribly convincing as a couple, but they are anything but dull. Kay Walsh as the maid whose place Wyman takes is unnerving and Joyce Grenfell , Lovey Ducks, brightens any film. Alastair sims is a whole circus by himself and no one has mentioned that his wife is the redoubtable Sybil Thorndyke. FinallyMichael Wilding is suave , quiet , with good boundaries , and a welcome change from the madness JANE is dealing with.
I find this film much more entertaining than The Wrong Man, I confess, .
|
|
|
|
Post by timshelboy on Jul 29, 2021 4:50:06 GMT
It's my number 5 Hitch. Preferable to THE WRONG MAN?  I'll say - I prefer it to NORTH BY NORTH WEST, PSYCHO and NOTORIOUS - sue me !!! Obvs I really like it a lot - I think it was one of the first Hitchcock I saw (LIFEBOAT, NBNW and THE BIRDS probably the others) ....a return to England setting, wonderful cast - esp Sim and marvelous Kay Walsh -and vast gallery of eccentrics, some lovely set pieces (the garden fete, the doll business, the denoument in the theatre), much humour, "the laziest girl in town", cosy RADA setting. His most underrated.
Lovely ducks! 
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Jul 31, 2021 14:27:30 GMT
Always had a weak spot for this movie, it's Hitchcock light, after all other prominent directors did a few light movies too.
|
|
|
|
Post by london777 on Jul 31, 2021 23:11:07 GMT
Always had a weak spot for this movie, it's Hitchcock light, after all other prominent directors did a few light movies too. All Hitchcock films are "light", in the sense that none of them tackle social, political, or spiritual issues" *. "And so much the better" say 99% of cinema patrons and 90% of posters here, but it does explain why I could never regard him as a director of the highest rank. Grahame Greene divided his novels into "novels" and "entertainments". All Hitchcocks are "entertainments" and I think he would have accepted that description happily. * He did attempt psychology in many of his films but it was all bogus and would be ridiculed by professionals today.
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Jul 31, 2021 23:40:36 GMT
Always had a weak spot for this movie, it's Hitchcock light, after all other prominent directors did a few light movies too. All Hitchcock films are "light", in the sense that none of them tackle social, political, or spiritual issues" *. "And so much the better" say 99% of cinema patrons and 90% of posters here, but it does explain why I could never regard him as a director of the highest rank. Grahame Greene divided his novels into "novels" and "entertainments". All Hitchcocks are "entertainments" and I think he would have accepted that description happily. * He did attempt psychology in many of his films but it was all bogus and would be ridiculed by professionals today. I don't want't to quarrel, with light I don't mean garbage. It's like a good pint of ale, but with less alcohol, but still the same ingredients, and still tastes good, but still not the same, since you don't get the usual ruse, but not too bad either.
|
|