|
|
Post by marianne48 on Aug 4, 2021 21:31:25 GMT
Hollywood has long had a tradition of casting great-looking actors to play less conventionally good-looking characters in film bios. Tony Curtis, at the height of his movie idol years, portrayed the average-looking Harry Houdini. Faye Dunaway and Warren Beatty played Bonnie and Clyde as fashion models. Abraham Lincoln was more homely than either Raymond Massey or Henry Fonda, who each portrayed him. Doris Day looked very little like the real Calamity Jane, and Cary Grant was spectacularly miscast as the nerdy-looking Cole Porter in Night and Day. The logic was that audiences would prefer to see glamour over realism.
What are some instances of the real-life subject actually being better-looking than the performer playing him/her? (in your opinion, at least). I can think of two, which I won't mention since the stars are still alive and working--when I saw pictures of the real-life people they portrayed, I thought they were more attractive than the stars playing them.
|
|
|
|
Post by Isapop on Aug 4, 2021 21:52:18 GMT
Dr. Ehrlich was better looking than Edward G. Robinson.
I've never seen a picture of Dr. Ehrlich, but I figure it's safe to say.
|
|
|
|
Post by jervistetch on Aug 5, 2021 1:57:56 GMT
GRACE OF MONACO Don’t get me wrong. I think Nicole Kidman is absolutely beautiful. But, in my opinion, no actor on earth could hope to outshine the radiance of Grace Kelly.  
|
|
|
|
Post by timshelboy on Aug 5, 2021 17:36:34 GMT
anyone who played this guy onscreen 
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Aug 5, 2021 17:56:30 GMT
Dr. Ehrlich was better looking than Edward G. Robinson. I've never seen a picture of Dr. Ehrlich, but I figure it's safe to say.  This is Dr Paul Ehrlich, if that's better looking or worse looking than Edward G. Robinson is up to each and everyone to decide.
|
|
|
|
Post by Isapop on Aug 5, 2021 17:58:56 GMT
Dr. Ehrlich was better looking than Edward G. Robinson. I've never seen a picture of Dr. Ehrlich, but I figure it's safe to say.  This is Dr Paul Ehrlich, if that's better looking or worse looking than Edward G. Robinson is up to each and everyone to decide. Just give those whiskers a proper trim, and it's no contest.
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Aug 5, 2021 18:01:33 GMT
  The real couple or the actors that played them in Gable and Lombard 1976
|
|
|
|
Post by marshamae on Aug 5, 2021 18:15:58 GMT
Emil Jannings played Peter the Great. I think Peter was empirically more handsome .
_-_Portrait_de_Pierre_Ier_(musée_de_l’Ermitage).jpg)
_-_Portrait_de_Pierre_Ier_(mus%C3%A9e_de_l%E2%80%99Ermitage).jpg) _-_Portrait_de_Pierre_Ier_(mus%C3%A9e_de_l%E2%80%99Ermitage).jpg)
_-_Portrait_de_Pierre_Ier_(musée_de_l’Ermitage).jpg)
_-_Portrait_de_Pierre_Ier_(mus%C3%A9e_de_l%E2%80%99Ermitage).jpg)
![]()
|
|
|
|
Post by marshamae on Aug 5, 2021 18:25:22 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by phantomparticle on Aug 5, 2021 22:29:17 GMT
Carroll Baker was beautiful but Jean Harlow was luminous 
|
|
|
|
Post by Isapop on Aug 5, 2021 22:37:37 GMT
Well, if I were an artist, I would be sure to make the most handsome and flattering portrait conceivable of anyone who can cut my head off.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Aug 6, 2021 3:19:32 GMT
There was nothing like those Kodachrome transparencies for producing a photographic vividness I call "hyper-realism" bringing, in this case, 1939 back to life as though it was five minutes ago. That portrait was made during a day-long shoot at the Gable/Lombard ranch in Encino shortly after their marriage, depicting Gable baling hay or currying horses, Lombard gathering flowers and the couple sitting casually on split-rail fences or posing before their brick-and-clapboard house in exhibitions of rustic domesticity. Gable remained in that home for the nearly nineteen years following Lombard's death until his own and, as a child in the same neighborhood (the poorer section, you understand), I was more than once alerted by Mom on the way to or from the local supermarket or barber shop with, "There's Clark Gable" as he trundled along Ventura Blvd in his Jeep and khaki shorts. I now return you to your regularly-scheduled thread.* *And no indeed, Jim Brolin and Jill Clayburgh were no Gable and Lombard.
|
|
|
|
Post by teleadm on Aug 6, 2021 16:57:14 GMT
There was nothing like those Kodachrome transparencies for producing a photographic vividness I call "hyper-realism" bringing, in this case, 1939 back to life as though it was five minutes ago. That portrait was made during a day-long shoot at the Gable/Lombard ranch in Encino shortly after their marriage, depicting Gable baling hay or currying horses, Lombard gathering flowers and the couple sitting casually on split-rail fences or posing before their brick-and-clapboard house in exhibitions of rustic domesticity. Gable remained in that home for the nearly nineteen years following Lombard's death until his own and, as a child in the same neighborhood (the poorer section, you understand), I was more than once alerted by Mom on the way to or from the local supermarket or barber shop with, "There's Clark Gable" as he trundled along Ventura Blvd in his Jeep and khaki shorts. I now return you to your regularly-scheduled thread.* *And no indeed, Jim Brolin and Jill Clayburgh were no Gable and Lombard. I really Really like when you share your stories, sorry could sound wrong in English, your memories!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by marshamae on Aug 6, 2021 17:41:30 GMT
Well, if I were an artist, I would be sure to make the most handsome and flattering portrait conceivable of anyone who can cut my head off. Worse yet, he had a habit of playing dentist, pulling the teeth of obstreperous boyars
|
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Aug 6, 2021 18:56:00 GMT
I really Really like when you share your stories, sorry could sound wrong in English, your memories!!! And that really, really warms me, teleadm. I sometimes worry that they may get tiresome. But "stories" or "memories," your English is just dandy, so no worries there.
|
|
|
|
Post by SuperDevilDoctor on Aug 10, 2021 15:27:23 GMT
And he was 6'6" tall, too!
|
|