Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 5:53:53 GMT
James Gunn had a real screenwriter helping him write the script. GotG 2 and The Suicide Squad sucked because he had full creative control. Doesn’t bode well for GotG 3. Disney should fire him again.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Aug 12, 2021 12:25:23 GMT
I still think GOTG 2 was alright. Nowhere near as good as the first one but not terrible. But yeah, he's been on a downward trajectory here, with Suicide Squad being unwatchable trash. I also worry about GOTG 3. We actually care about these characters, shock value deaths with no real purpose to anything transpiring on screen will be tough to stomach.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 15:54:48 GMT
I still think GOTG 2 was alright. Nowhere near as good as the first one but not terrible. But yeah, he's been on a downward trajectory here, with Suicide Squad being unwatchable trash. I also worry about GOTG 3. We actually care about these characters, shock value deaths with no real purpose to anything transpiring on screen will be tough to stomach. I do actually enjoy Vol 2 to a certain extent. But you can really see the descent into self indulgence. It’s a lot more juvenile than the first and it’s got a bit of that mean spiritedness that made TSS so cringey. Letting directors write the script for their movies on their own is almost always a bad idea. Even letting Patty Jenkins share screenwriting credit turned out to be a disastrous mistake.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Aug 12, 2021 16:49:40 GMT
I didn't know that.
GOTG2 was more polished than SS2 but it does have the same feel and flow to it. Both were nowhere near as tight and cohesive as the first GOTG. If you're saying that GOTG had a different writer but Gunn was the one who penned GOTG2 and SS2 then that might explain it.
I actually do think GOTG2 has more in common with SS2 than it did with the first GOTG.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 17:53:53 GMT
I didn't know that. GOTG2 was more polished than SS2 but it does have the same feel and flow to it. Both were nowhere near as tight and cohesive as the first GOTG. If you're saying that GOTG had a different writer but Gunn was the one who penned GOTG2 and SS2 then that might explain it. I actually do think GOTG2 has more in common with SS2 than it did with the first GOTG. Yeah, the first GotG had a screenwriter named Nicole Perlman. Gunn co-wrote. So his ideas were likely filtered through the writing process with an actual professional screenwriter. And who knows- the best ideas could very well have been hers. Directors always get credit even when it’s the screenwriters that did the real story crafting (see all of the Russo Bros movies, where the awesome screenwriters never get the credit due). The third movie is set to use a script written entirely by Gunn, so prepare for more Vol 2/ TSS style over indulgence.
|
|
|
Post by Skaathar on Aug 12, 2021 18:06:00 GMT
I didn't know that. GOTG2 was more polished than SS2 but it does have the same feel and flow to it. Both were nowhere near as tight and cohesive as the first GOTG. If you're saying that GOTG had a different writer but Gunn was the one who penned GOTG2 and SS2 then that might explain it. I actually do think GOTG2 has more in common with SS2 than it did with the first GOTG. Yeah, the first GotG had a screenwriter named Nicole Perlman. Gunn co-wrote. So his ideas were likely filtered through the writing process with an actual professional screenwriter. And who knows- the best ideas could very well have been hers. Directors always get credit even when it’s the screenwriters that did the real story crafting (see all of the Russo Bros movies, where the awesome screenwriters never get the credit due). The third movie is set to use a script written entirely by Gunn, so prepare for more Vol 2/ TSS style over indulgence. While the first GOTG movie had a light, humorous tone, it still took itself seriously. GOTG2 and TSS have this trippy, wacky, almost irreverent feel to it that makes them a few clicks short of a parody. Not quite but almost. It's the same issue that Deadpool2 had. So yeah, I'd hate for GOTG3 to go the same route. Not that GOTG2 and TSS were bad movies, far from it, but they certainly weren't as good as the reviews are saying and definitely nowhere near as good as the first GOTG.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 19:16:11 GMT
Yeah, the first GotG had a screenwriter named Nicole Perlman. Gunn co-wrote. So his ideas were likely filtered through the writing process with an actual professional screenwriter. And who knows- the best ideas could very well have been hers. Directors always get credit even when it’s the screenwriters that did the real story crafting (see all of the Russo Bros movies, where the awesome screenwriters never get the credit due). The third movie is set to use a script written entirely by Gunn, so prepare for more Vol 2/ TSS style over indulgence. While the first GOTG movie had a light, humorous tone, it still took itself seriously. GOTG2 and TSS have this trippy, wacky, almost irreverent feel to it that makes them a few clicks short of a parody. Not quite but almost. It's the same issue that Deadpool2 had. So yeah, I'd hate for GOTG3 to go the same route. Not that GOTG2 and TSS were bad movies, far from it, but they certainly weren't as good as the reviews are saying and definitely nowhere near as good as the first GOTG. The trippy surrealism is actually something I could get behind. But the excessive and often unfunny humor is what ruined Vol 2 for me. Drax was a real character in the first movie. After that, he’s just there for “dumb guy” jokes. But the real downside is that Gunn unleashed allows his mean spirited demented side to take over. I’m honestly surprised that so many people found The Suicide Squad to be funny. It did have its moments, but it’s also twisted AF and incredibly immature- like a screenplay by an edge lord middle school kid.
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 12, 2021 19:44:43 GMT
While the first GOTG movie had a light, humorous tone, it still took itself seriously. GOTG2 and TSS have this trippy, wacky, almost irreverent feel to it that makes them a few clicks short of a parody. Not quite but almost. It's the same issue that Deadpool2 had. So yeah, I'd hate for GOTG3 to go the same route. Not that GOTG2 and TSS were bad movies, far from it, but they certainly weren't as good as the reviews are saying and definitely nowhere near as good as the first GOTG. The trippy surrealism is actually something I could get behind. But the excessive and often unfunny humor is what ruined Vol 2 for me. Drax was a real character in the first movie. After that, he’s just there for “dumb guy” jokes. But the real downside is that Gunn unleashed allows his mean spirited demented side to take over. I’m honestly surprised that so many people found The Suicide Squad to be funny. It did have its moments, but it’s also twisted AF and incredibly immature- like a screenplay by an edge lord middle school kid. I mean, to be fair, when you have a property with a dark premise that has ‘suicide’ in the title, something like that is difficult to avoid.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 21:21:04 GMT
The trippy surrealism is actually something I could get behind. But the excessive and often unfunny humor is what ruined Vol 2 for me. Drax was a real character in the first movie. After that, he’s just there for “dumb guy” jokes. But the real downside is that Gunn unleashed allows his mean spirited demented side to take over. I’m honestly surprised that so many people found The Suicide Squad to be funny. It did have its moments, but it’s also twisted AF and incredibly immature- like a screenplay by an edge lord middle school kid. I mean, to be fair, when you have a property with a dark premise that has ‘suicide’ in the title, something like that is difficult to avoid. Is it though? I get that the material is darker and warrants some dark humor. But it’s also got a talking shark in it so it’s not exactly The Punisher. I mean, did the beach sequence really need to be more violent than Saving Private Ryan? Who exactly is the target audience here?
|
|
|
Post by thisguy4000 on Aug 12, 2021 21:36:10 GMT
I mean, to be fair, when you have a property with a dark premise that has ‘suicide’ in the title, something like that is difficult to avoid. Is it though? I get that the material is darker and warrants some dark humor. But it’s also got a talking shark in it so it’s not exactly The Punisher. I mean, did the beach sequence really need to be more violent than Saving Private Ryan? Who exactly is the target audience here? Well, the movie is a lot more cartoony and over the top than Saving Private Ryan. It leans pretty heavily into comic book absurdity. It just has a crude sense of humor to it, which is to be expected from James Gunn. I’m actually not the biggest fan of Gunn’s brand of humor either, but I knew what to expect from his take of the Suicide Squad.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 12, 2021 22:33:03 GMT
Is it though? I get that the material is darker and warrants some dark humor. But it’s also got a talking shark in it so it’s not exactly The Punisher. I mean, did the beach sequence really need to be more violent than Saving Private Ryan? Who exactly is the target audience here? Well, the movie is a lot more cartoony and over the top than Saving Private Ryan. It leans pretty heavily into comic book absurdity. It just has a crude sense of humor to it, which is to be expected from James Gunn. I’m actually not the biggest fan of Gunn’s brand of humor either, but I knew what to expect from his take of the Suicide Squad. Fair enough. I suppose I should just accept that this movie wasn’t for me and move on. But… I do think Gunn has some real strengths that can shine if he’s got others there to help him write and reign in some of his darkness and immaturity. And this may be an unpopular opinion but I actually think The Suicide Squad would’ve been a much better movie if it were limited by a PG 13 rating. Certainly would’ve been more financially successful too.
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on Aug 12, 2021 23:43:12 GMT
Well, the movie is a lot more cartoony and over the top than Saving Private Ryan. It leans pretty heavily into comic book absurdity. It just has a crude sense of humor to it, which is to be expected from James Gunn. I’m actually not the biggest fan of Gunn’s brand of humor either, but I knew what to expect from his take of the Suicide Squad. Fair enough. I suppose I should just accept that this movie wasn’t for me and move on. But… I do think Gunn has some real strengths that can shine if he’s got others there to help him write and reign in some of his darkness and immaturity. And this may be an unpopular opinion but I actually think The Suicide Squad would’ve been a much better movie if it were limited by a PG 13 rating. Certainly would’ve been more financially successful too. The pandemic and HBOMAX kind of ruined any hopes of a decent box office. But you're spot on. The R rating had Gunn thinking of all the things he could do from a crassness standpoint instead of from a storytelling standpoint. "How man dick jokes and exploding faces can I put into this movie," shouldn't be the focal point of the creative process. Another thing that can't be stressed enough is how much emphasis they put on the ridiculousness. You look at GOTG and it has a talking raccoon and a talking tree- and the tree only repeats one line; yet through the course of that movie, the tree displays more personality and certainly more heart than anything we get in Suicide Squad. "We are Groot," or Peter remembering his mother's final words in his moment of need; those scenes pack so much emotion into them because the characters have earned it despite being goofy. The story captured their humanity in a way SS never did with anyone at all. They're just a bunch of idiots. Oh, I guess I'm supposed to feel an emotional attachment to Bloodsport because he exchanged f bombs with his daughter for a minute and a half. Even GOTG 2 had great stuff like Yondu's death or dingbat Mantis touching a smiling Drax and crying after feeling his inner pain. It's just amazing to me that the same guy directed those two movies and then directed SS. A bunch of soulless shitheads running around a vapid script until the credits roll. There is one solitary great line in SS: the Starro army as it collapses, revealing his inner thoughts, "I was happy floating in space," or something to that effect. But the moment doesn't work because he's just been a mindless creature up until that point, and the rest of the cast are maniacs without any real motivation or depth. It's as if Gunn didn't know or didn't care what he was going to do with this project. It really does feel like a spoof of itself.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on Aug 13, 2021 1:17:36 GMT
Fair enough. I suppose I should just accept that this movie wasn’t for me and move on. But… I do think Gunn has some real strengths that can shine if he’s got others there to help him write and reign in some of his darkness and immaturity. And this may be an unpopular opinion but I actually think The Suicide Squad would’ve been a much better movie if it were limited by a PG 13 rating. Certainly would’ve been more financially successful too.The pandemic and HBOMAX kind of ruined any hopes of a decent box office. But you're spot on. The R rating had Gunn thinking of all the things he could do from a crassness standpoint instead of from a storytelling standpoint. "How man dick jokes and exploding faces can I put into this movie," shouldn't be the focal point of the creative process. Another thing that can't be stressed enough is how much emphasis they put on the ridiculousness. You look at GOTG and it has a talking raccoon and a talking tree- and the tree only repeats one line; yet through the course of that movie, the tree displays more personality and certainly more heart than anything we get in Suicide Squad. "We are Groot," or Peter remembering his mother's final words in his moment of need; those scenes pack so much emotion into them because the characters have earned it despite being goofy. The story captured their humanity in a way SS never did with anyone at all. They're just a bunch of idiots. Oh, I guess I'm supposed to feel an emotional attachment to Bloodsport because he exchanged f bombs with his daughter for a minute and a half. Even GOTG 2 had great stuff like Yondu's death or dingbat Mantis touching a smiling Drax and crying after feeling his inner pain. It's just amazing to me that the same guy directed those two movies and then directed SS. A bunch of soulless shitheads running around a vapid script until the credits roll. There is one solitary great line in SS: the Starro army as it collapses, revealing his inner thoughts, "I was happy floating in space," or something to that effect. But the moment doesn't work because he's just been a mindless creature up until that point, and the rest of the cast are maniacs without any real motivation or depth. It's as if Gunn didn't know or didn't care what he was going to do with this project. It really does feel like a spoof of itself. 100% agreed. Very well said. And I’ll just add that even the stuff that could’ve potentially worked as dark comedy falls completely flat at best and feels sadistic at worst because Gunn just did not know when to hold back. Example: Weasel drowning. If, say, he’d just sunk like a stone instantly it may have been cartoonish and absurd enough to be darkly funny. But instead Gunn has him scream and struggle and you think for a second that it’s supposed to be serious, but you’re not sure because there’s still “jokes” during it. So you’re left wondering WTF is this supposed to be right now? And that was the entire movie for me. Just pure uncomfortable cringe.
|
|
|
Post by Hauntedknight87 on Aug 13, 2021 1:57:26 GMT
Honestly I kinda wish he would work with another writer.
He definitely writes some cringey dialogue from time to time.
|
|