|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 19, 2017 13:07:23 GMT
tpfkar It's easy to understand why some are frantic to believe there's something better than what they've lived. 
If I thought that were the case, I might be out robbing and looting and having a hell of a good time right now. |
|
|
|
Post by FilmFlaneur on May 19, 2017 13:11:19 GMT
It is best explained as 'Jam tomorrow'.
|
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 19, 2017 13:34:02 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Jillian on May 19, 2017 16:25:52 GMT
I suppose so to some extent. Difficult to say though. I prefer the title agnostic to atheist. You can be an agnostic atheist. The two terms aren't mutually exclusive. Technically, everyone's an agnostic, if people were truly honest with themselves. Right. Well, I am not an atheist. I love the term agnostic. It is complicated and intriguing. Nothing' for certain and is beyond our comprehension. Heart knows, brain cannot register it.  |
|
|
|
Post by phludowin on May 19, 2017 20:49:56 GMT
I suppose so to some extent. Difficult to say though. I prefer the title agnostic to atheist. You can be an agnostic atheist. The two terms aren't mutually exclusive. Technically, everyone's an agnostic, if people were truly honest with themselves. I'm not. I believe that if God existed, it would be possible to gain knowledge about it. But so far, no evidence for deity has turned up, and I believe that this absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Which does not mean that I consider it impossible for deities to exist. Therefore, I'm a non-agnostic weak atheist. |
|
JustAVievv
Sophomore
@justavievv
Posts: 154
Likes: 26
 
|
Post by JustAVievv on May 19, 2017 23:03:43 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Jillian on May 20, 2017 6:20:28 GMT
Go take a nap.
|
|
|
|
Post by progressiveelement on May 20, 2017 11:08:16 GMT
I don't believe any life for you exists outside internet message forums.
👍
|
|
|
|
Post by johnblutarsky on May 20, 2017 13:58:12 GMT
You can be an agnostic atheist. The two terms aren't mutually exclusive. Technically, everyone's an agnostic, if people were truly honest with themselves. I'm not. I believe that if God existed, it would be possible to gain knowledge about it. But so far, no evidence for deity has turned up, and I believe that this absence of evidence is evidence of absence. Which does not mean that I consider it impossible for deities to exist. Therefore, I'm a non-agnostic weak atheist. I suppose you can give yourself any label you want, but it may cause confusion when you discuss your stance with others. To clarify...if you do not "consider it impossible for deities to exist"....do you consider it possible for deities to exist (however slim the chance may be)? If so, then you don't know if a god does or does not exist. If you don't know if a god exists/doesn't exist...then you're an agnostic. In addition, if you don't believe in god/gods (based on lack of evidence)...you're an atheist. Hence, agnostic atheist. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 20, 2017 14:28:44 GMT
Still nothing.  Can you prove that you believe there's still nothing? |
|
