|
|
Post by janntosh on Sept 6, 2021 16:58:07 GMT
 vs 
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 6, 2021 17:53:10 GMT
Wrath of Khan (7/10)
Into Darkness (8/10)
|
|
|
|
Post by FridayOnElmStreet on Sept 6, 2021 18:03:02 GMT
The Wrath of Khan
|
|
|
|
Post by Popeye Doyle on Sept 6, 2021 18:18:33 GMT
I like both but can’t top the original
|
|
|
|
Post by movielover on Sept 6, 2021 18:32:06 GMT
The Wrath of Khan
|
|
|
|
Post by jcush on Sept 6, 2021 18:51:28 GMT
Wrath of Khan - 7.5/10
Into Darkness - 6.5/10
What holds Into Darkness back for me is the last 20 minutes or so when it turns into a rehash of Wrath of Khan.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Sept 6, 2021 19:33:24 GMT
Wrath of Khan (7/10) Into Darkness (8/10) Interesting. How come? |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Sept 6, 2021 19:33:26 GMT
Wrath of Khan (7/10) Into Darkness (8/10) You're going to have to explain to me why you thought Benedict Cumberbatch was a better Khan to me. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 6, 2021 19:39:11 GMT
Wrath of Khan (7/10) Into Darkness (8/10) Interesting. How come? I enjoyed it more. Out of all the 3 films, I liked the Abrams-Lin series the most.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 6, 2021 19:40:37 GMT
Wrath of Khan (7/10) Into Darkness (8/10) You're going to have to explain to me why you thought Benedict Cumberbatch was a better Khan to me. Did I imply that in my post? I enjoyed Into Darkness more but I still liked Montalban.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Sept 6, 2021 19:44:19 GMT
You're going to have to explain to me why you thought Benedict Cumberbatch was a better Khan to me. Did I imply that in my post? I enjoyed Into Darkness more but I still liked Montalban. Given that Benedict ate up most of the screentime I think I can be forgiven for assuming that. |
|
|
|
Post by Mulder and Scully on Sept 6, 2021 20:39:26 GMT
Haven't seen them. I have no interest in Star Trek.
|
|
|
|
Post by alpha128 on Sept 6, 2021 20:51:17 GMT
I like both but can’t top the original ^ This
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 6, 2021 22:19:33 GMT
The Wrath of Kahn - 7/10
Into Darkness - 5/10
Into Darkness is one of the worst Star Trek movies imo. It is really no fun and rehashes Wrath of Kahn too much. Cumberbatch is just so dull here. All of the energy, flow and chemistry of the 2009 movie is absent.
|
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Sept 6, 2021 22:28:44 GMT
Did I imply that in my post? I enjoyed Into Darkness more but I still liked Montalban. Given that Benedict ate up most of the screentime I think I can be forgiven for assuming that. Nah, you can't.
|
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Sept 6, 2021 22:46:11 GMT
Given that Benedict ate up most of the screentime I think I can be forgiven for assuming that. Nah, you can't. Shut up. I forgive your teacher failing for you. |
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Sept 6, 2021 22:48:55 GMT
Given that Benedict ate up most of the screentime I think I can be forgiven for assuming that. Nah, you can't. Yes I can. Your teacher failed you so you should be all about forgiveness. |
|
|
|
Post by President Ackbar™ on Sept 6, 2021 22:51:22 GMT
Shut up. I forgive your teacher failing for you. My older brother Rex Racer taught me how to drive.
|
|
|
|
Post by Archelaus on Sept 7, 2021 0:16:06 GMT
Wrath of Khan (8/10)
Into Darkness (7/10)
|
|
|
|
Post by darkreviewer2013 on Sept 7, 2021 7:16:38 GMT
The Wrath of Khan - 10/10. The best of the TOS films and my favourite movie of 1982. A very well-directed film with a good story, neat sci-fi premise, beautiful effects and cinematography, perfect resolution and spectacular score. Also boasts Shatner's best ever performance.
Star Trek Into Darkness - 2/10. The visuals aren't bad, but it's a ill-thought-out rehash of the 1982 film with a woeful and confounding reimagining of Khan, a nonsensical plot and a careless approach to the source material that oftentimes plays like a parody of classic Trek.
|
|
