|
|
Post by janntosh on Sept 14, 2021 12:53:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on Sept 14, 2021 13:02:29 GMT
Not EVEN CLOSE!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Sept 14, 2021 13:06:41 GMT
I am sure it used to be, but not anymore.
I watched it in 2001 and it was nothing scary about it in my opinion.
|
|
|
|
Post by dwightmachinehead on Sept 14, 2021 13:23:24 GMT
It's a wee bit dated, although good psychological horror. I find psychological horror scarier than jump scare, gore horror. Slashers etc I find boring.
|
|
|
|
Post by Catman 猫的主人 on Sept 14, 2021 13:26:20 GMT
No.
|
|
|
|
Post by Winter_King on Sept 14, 2021 13:51:09 GMT
I think it's one of the best horror movies. Scariest? Nah.
But I personally prefer the Exorcist style of horror over jump scares.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 14, 2021 14:13:10 GMT
Still haven't seen it yet.
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Sept 14, 2021 14:19:10 GMT
What I do find scary about it is that it deals with the biblical version of the supernatural, which a lot of people actually believe in. So I can imagine that the movie struck quite a nerve and probably still does.
For me it was scary for the longest time because my mother made the mistake of taking me with her to see that as a little child.
(Here's what you can take from that- A) I'm old, and B) as an only child my mom used to take me to see EVERYTHING! That's how I ended up seeing this, Carrie, Jaws, The Omen, Star Wars, etc.)
So for me as a kid that was horrifying and it stayed with me for a while. But as an adult I decided to make a conscious effort to get over it, so I rented it and watched it all alone in a the dark. Not a bad movie, still scary, but not as much as I'd built it up to be. Another one I did that with Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the original. Same experience.
Now I like scary movies, but I prefer truly scary movies where the director is smart enough to use film language to create fear(Hereditary, The Witch, The Babbadook, Gretl and Hansel, etc.), as opposed to bloody gore, which does nothing for me and I see as immature.
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Sept 14, 2021 14:20:11 GMT
Ok, then what is, in your opinion?
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Sept 14, 2021 14:21:15 GMT
Ok, then what is, in your opinion?
|
|
|
|
Post by lenlenlen1 on Sept 14, 2021 14:22:44 GMT
Ok, then what is, in your opinion? (The Catsorcist? LOL You know they need it sometimes!)
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 14, 2021 17:11:32 GMT
No, but it is very creepy.
There aren't many horror movies I find scary though. Many I find creepy, but not scary.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 14, 2021 17:17:41 GMT
What I do find scary about it is that it deals with the biblical version of the supernatural, which a lot of people actually believe in. So I can imagine that the movie struck quite a nerve and probably still does. For me it was scary for the longest time because my mother made the mistake of taking me with her to see that as a little child. ( Here's what you can take from that- A) I'm old, and B) as an only child my mom used to take me to see EVERYTHING! That's how I ended up seeing this, Carrie, Jaws, The Omen, Star Wars, etc.) So for me as a kid that was horrifying and it stayed with me for a while. But as an adult I decided to make a conscious effort to get over it, so I rented it and watched it all alone in a the dark. Not a bad movie, still scary, but not as much as I'd built it up to be. Another one I did that with Texas Chainsaw Massacre, the original. Same experience. Now I like scary movies, but I prefer truly scary movies where the director is smart enough to use film language to create fear(Hereditary, The Witch, The Babbadook, Gretl and Hansel, etc.), as opposed to bloody gore, which does nothing for me and I see as immature. That is a good point. If you are a theist (particularly a Biblical theist) than I can understand why The Exorcist would be very scary to you. It is a movie that is very good at what it does and still one of the most impressive horror movies ever made imo. Lists are also taking into account when it was released and the notorious stories about people fainting in the theater.
|
|
|
|
Post by phantomparticle on Sept 14, 2021 18:24:38 GMT
Jeese Louise!
How may times do we have to go over this worn-to-the-bone territory? Every couple of months someone has to slam the impact of The Exorcist, looking at it from a 21st Century perspective.
Of course, it isn't going to frighten modern audiences that grew up on the most graphic and vile horror films of the last fifty years.
Hubris is a wonderful thing, especially if you weren't in the audience in 1973 when the movie was new and an unknown. I was, and I can tell you it scared the hell out of people, young and old.
|
|
|
|
Post by Mulder and Scully on Sept 14, 2021 19:59:14 GMT
The greatest real reaction video of all time. We'll never see anything like this again.
|
|
|
|
Post by jonesjxd on Sept 14, 2021 22:01:00 GMT
I'm sure if you were of movie going age in 1973 it would probably be the scariest film of all time, but I'm guessing most of us weren't among those people. By time I came around the movie had been parodied and ripped off to death, but I still watch it and believe it's a near perfect movie. I don't care if I don't find it scary. Honestly in my lifetime I think the scariest movies have been The Grudge, Sinister, The Conjuring 1 and 2 and Hereditary. Those are really the only 5 movies I can think of that actually freaked me out.
|
|
|
|
Post by Nicko's Nose on Sept 14, 2021 22:02:00 GMT
It probably is and I’ve seen nearly 2000 horror movies.
|
|
|
|
Post by spooner5020 on Sept 14, 2021 22:24:28 GMT
Ok, then what is, in your opinion? The Changeling.
|
|
|
|
Post by Doghouse6 on Sept 14, 2021 23:50:53 GMT
There probably ain't no such animal as "the scariest movie ever made." It's impossible to quantify. But people often do get scared of things that are unknown or unfamiliar to them. When experienced for the first time, things that aren't inherently frightening on their own can seem scary: first day of school; first sex; first job interview and so on. In 1925, The Phantom Of the Opera was likely the scariest movie experience audiences had had; in 1931, it was Frankenstein; in 1960, Psycho. In each case, it was an experience viewers had never had at a movie. In '73-'74, it's probably fair to say The Exorcist was the scariest film audiences had yet seen. In '75, maybe Jaws. By '79, it might have been Alien. In every one of these examples, it was an experience moviegoers had never had before; a "first". And of those last three, I knew people at the time who were completely freaked out by at least one of them. Something endemic to thrills and fright in entertainment is anticipation, like that occurring when waiting in a long line for a roller-coaster while the cars go whizzing by and riders scream their heads off . For premiere engagements in '31, Universal contrived to have ambulances parked outside theaters and uniformed doctors and/or nurses in lobbies to attend to patrons who, to paraphrase Edward Van Sloan's pre-credits prologue, couldn't subject their nerves to such a strain. In 1960, Alfred Hitchcock stoked anticipation by requiring exhibitors to refuse any further seating once the film started, and warned patrons in ads not to reveal the big final-reel surprise. To the best of my recollection, the buzz surrounding The Exorcist was organically word-of-mouth, although Warner Bros soon capitalized on it, as reflected in the video submitted by user Mulder and Scully . At the age of 20, the line outside Westwood Village's National Theater was the longest in which I'd ever waited to see a film. And all the while, in full view of those of us waiting, was the three-dimensional "Regan's Window" display attached to the theater's east exterior wall, with the curtains ominously blowing outward photo below).  With that, the long wait and all the hype, patrons were fully primed by the time they took their seats. And whether they were being attention-seeking drama queens or not, there actually were people who bolted from their seats and ran up the aisle toward the lobby either whimpering or gagging. And for all I know, WB paid them to be there and do it, but it had the desired effect on the 1000-plus viewers remaining. Movies and much else have changed in the nearly 50 years ensuing since The Exorcist's release, and by the time I saw the decades-old Phantom and Frankenstein on TV at ages still in the single digits, they seemed remote and almost quaint to me, having already been scared as a wee tyke in darkened theaters by the likes of House On Haunted Hill, 13 Ghosts and The House Of Usher. So, unless it happens to touch some particular vulnerability, it's not surprising that perhaps the majority of 21st-century viewers may come away from a first watch of The Exorcist with a "What's the big deal" attitude. I can't really say it scared me nigh unto 48 years ago. I think I can say frankly that the length of the line was as scary as anything: "What? Are you kidding me? Fuckin' line's already halfway around the block. I've never waited two hours for any movie in my life!" But as it unspooled, it did get me, as the saying goes, on the edge of my seat. All in all and as filmic thrills go, I'd say it more or less amounted to a "ya hadda be there" kind of thing. Just like those customers of '25, '31 or '60.
|
|
|
|
Post by OldAussie on Sept 15, 2021 0:02:00 GMT
I saw it back in the day on the big screen and I can't understand the over the top reaction to it. It was atmospheric, but not scary. Still works well as a character driven drama but "scary".....no.
In fact, the actual exorcism is the weakest part of the movie.
|
|