|
|
Post by mstreepsucks on Sept 26, 2021 16:52:26 GMT
I only had one problem with this film overall. But it's still good.
Some of the acting by the lead man wasn't great but only some of the time. The acting could have been slightly beter maybe. But I'm gonna assume,
maybe his acting improves by the second one? Who would agree with me a little bit?
But what do i know, i'm only a child.
|
|
|
|
Post by Isapop on Sept 26, 2021 20:01:18 GMT
I only had one problem with this film overall. But it's still good.
Some of the acting by the lead man wasn't great but only some of the time. The acting could have been slightly beter maybe. But I'm gonna assume,
maybe his acting improves by the second one? Who would agree with me a little bit?
Oh, most definitely. Whereas Mr. Weissmuller's performance in Tarzan The Ape Man was quite splendid within its rather modest scope and ambition, he showed tremendous growth as a thespian in Tarzan And His Mate, bringing a depth and sensitivity to the part, especially in the subtlety he brought to the by-play with Cheetah (with its daring interspecies erotic overtones), as well as an artistic commitment to vine swinging that seemed only tentative in his first outing.
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 26, 2021 20:16:26 GMT
He’s more or less the same in both movies. But it’s fine since Maureen O’Sullivan is acting for the both of them.
|
|
|
|
Post by mattgarth on Sept 26, 2021 20:56:14 GMT
MATE was MGM's head Art Director Cedric Gibbons' sole film direction effort -- and a pretty good job of it he did. It was the best picture in the whole series at the studio.
|
|
|
|
Post by jervistetch on Sept 26, 2021 21:27:57 GMT
Until John and Bo Derek put them all to shame.  |
|
|
|
Post by Isapop on Sept 26, 2021 22:03:37 GMT
Until John and Bo Derek put them all to shame. "Me Tarzan, you 10"
|
|
|
|
Post by Feologild Oakes on Sept 26, 2021 22:09:38 GMT
I think its a decent movie.
|
|
