|
|
Post by moviemouth on Sept 30, 2021 18:21:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Lux on Sept 30, 2021 18:25:39 GMT
It honestly looks abhorrent.
|
|
|
|
Post by onethreetwo on Sept 30, 2021 18:31:44 GMT
I still can't make myself watch the first one. It looked so bad and this looks the same.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 30, 2021 19:00:23 GMT
Wait, it's seriously PG-13? Do these people actually know who Carnage is? You might as well make a PG-13 movie about Ted Bundy.
|
|
|
|
Post by ck100 on Sept 30, 2021 19:12:12 GMT
Apparently this is a movie that has a scene take place in 1996 in which Woody Harrelson is a teenager (even though Woody in real life was already 35 in 1996).
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 30, 2021 19:14:12 GMT
Apparently this is a movie that has a scene take place in 1996 in which Woody Harrelson is a teenager (even though Woody in real life was already 35 in 1996). Interesting trivia, did you know Woody's dad was a hitman?
|
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Sept 30, 2021 20:26:33 GMT
Wait, it's seriously PG-13? Do these people actually know who Carnage is? You might as well make a PG-13 movie about Ted Bundy. Tom Hardy said that a R rated version was considered. #ReleaseTheCarnageCut! |
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Sept 30, 2021 20:29:28 GMT
64% is higher than I thought it'd get.
|
|
|
|
Post by lowtacks86 on Sept 30, 2021 20:35:45 GMT
If this makes money, I wonder if they'll do the Maximum Carnage storyline next
|
|
|
|
Post by James on Sept 30, 2021 21:28:47 GMT
59% ATM. Looks like a good sign(?). I can see this embracing the silliness like the first but done better.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviebuffbrad on Oct 12, 2021 5:00:46 GMT
It sucked. That's my review.
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Nov 28, 2021 17:48:20 GMT
1/10 Apparently this is a movie that has a scene take place in 1996 in which Woody Harrelson is a teenager (even though Woody in real life was already 35 in 1996). Woody provides the voice, but a different actor appears on screen. |
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Nov 28, 2021 18:04:50 GMT
If this makes money, I wonder if they'll do the Maximum Carnage storyline next From what I read, this is as close to it as we're probably gonna get. And it did end up making money;so far it grossed 4x its production budget.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Nov 28, 2021 18:11:09 GMT
1/10 Apparently this is a movie that has a scene take place in 1996 in which Woody Harrelson is a teenager (even though Woody in real life was already 35 in 1996). Woody provides the voice, but a different actor appears on screen. I could be wrong, but I think the issue that ck100 is raising is that the age of the character in 1996 doesn't match with what Woody Harrelson's age would have been in 1996. ck worded it in such a way that makes it sound like he is assuming that Woody Harrelson plays his teenage self in the movie, but I don't think that is what he meant.
|
|
|
|
Post by frankcaprica on Nov 28, 2021 19:54:58 GMT
Bad movie
|
|
|
|
Post by Vits on Nov 28, 2021 20:18:17 GMT
I could be wrong, but I think the issue that ck100 is raising is that the age of the character in 1996 doesn't match with what Woody Harrelson's age would have been in 1996. ck worded it in such a way that makes it sound like he is assuming that Woody Harrelson plays his teenage self in the movie, but I don't think that is what he meant. Ah, got it. Well... Yes, it's a common practice in the industry: Taking measures to make a male actor look younger than he is. In this case, Woody is given a love interest who in real life is 15 years younger than him, but in the flashback, they're both the same age. I'm actually surprised Michelle Williams was cast as Tom Hardy's love interest, since they're around the same age.
|
|
|
|
Post by moviemouth on Nov 28, 2021 20:26:49 GMT
I could be wrong, but I think the issue that ck100 is raising is that the age of the character in 1996 doesn't match with what Woody Harrelson's age would have been in 1996. ck worded it in such a way that makes it sound like he is assuming that Woody Harrelson plays his teenage self in the movie, but I don't think that is what he meant. Ah, got it. Well... Yes, it's a common practice in the industry: Taking measures to make a male actor look younger than he is. In this case, Woody is given a love interest who in real life is 15 years younger than him, but in the flashback, they're both the same age. I'm actually surprised Michelle Williams was cast as Tom Hardy's love interest, since they're around the same age. I agree.
|
|
