|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 5, 2021 8:34:30 GMT
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 6, 2021 8:21:50 GMT
That's ridiculous. Never cave into the self-appointed censors.
Having a sense of the ridiculous helps too. Of course this place wasn’t going to be bombed.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 6, 2021 18:49:19 GMT
Having a sense of the ridiculous helps too. Of course this place wasn’t going to be bombed. Nah, Stamm, you can't wiggle out of this one. We all know v2 won't be bombed by Jihadists.
But you didn't post the pic. You allowed yourself to be censored. Why is that?
It’s a shit doodle which has already had enough attention and caused enough trouble. Yeah I could have posted it but I could have also pissed on the Koran and called it art. I personally don’t give a shit about this attention seeking stuff but I see no reason for causing this forum any grief because I know from experience that there are people who complain to ProBoards about stuff that gets posted here. Mind you, it’s easy being a brave rebel when you’re hiding your identity (and your message board). Now answer this: Was Lars Vilks a cartoonist?
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 6, 2021 19:22:44 GMT
Having a sense of the ridiculous helps too. Of course this place wasn’t going to be bombed. Nah, Stamm, you can't wiggle out of this one. We all know v2 won't be bombed by Jihadists.
But you didn't post the pic. You allowed yourself to be censored. Why is that?
You lying piece of shit… “A Brit on another forum objected to me posting it.” You just can’t help doing this, can you?
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 7:58:04 GMT
You lying piece of shit… “A Brit on another forum objected to me posting it.” You just can’t help doing this, can you? Now you're just being an asshole. Namecalling? Creepy as fuck, old git.
Would you have preferred I posted your name? I was trying to respect your privacy. I won't next time.
Another European also thought I was horrible for posting that silly cartoon.
Yes, I will mock Muhammad. You have a problem with that? Whine to the Admin.
You lied. Just admit it.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 8:03:48 GMT
It’s a shit doodle which has already had enough attention and caused enough trouble. Yeah I could have posted it but I could have also pissed on the Koran and called it art. I personally don’t give a shit about this attention seeking stuff but I see no reason for causing this forum any grief because I know from experience that there are people who complain to ProBoards about stuff that gets posted here. Mind you, it’s easy being a brave rebel when you’re hiding your identity (and your message board). Now answer this: Was Lars Vilks a cartoonist? Was Lars Vilks a cartoonist? Who cares? Apparently some people thought he was dangerous enough to murder. I don't care if it's art or if it meets your artistic approval.
And I am also confident that ProBoards doesn't give a rat's ass if we post the cartoon so the posters here know what we're talking about. Rather shoddy posting on your part to try and hide it. Seriously, ProBoards would censor that silly scribble? On what basis? Blasphemy?
We do all sorts of lampoons of religious figures. In the West Jesus is mocked in art all the time. No one gets killed.
Brave rebel? For posting a doodle?
You caved in to censors of the most vile sort. You should be ashamed of yourself. Seriously.
That was the main topic but you wanted to turn this thread against me. If I wanted to post the doodle and didn’t do that because of fear then I caved in but I didn’t feel the need to do it in the first place. But we’ll done. You’re a message board hero.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 8:59:14 GMT
You lied. Just admit it. What did I lie about, dumbass?
You're just annoying at this point. Now you're gonna wiggle around a bit and claim you never disapproved that I posted that cartoon.
You said I was offended by you posting that doodle. That is the lie. I’m not offended, I just didn’t bother to post a doodle that’s freely available on the internet and that struck your Message Board Hero nerve. So you lied.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 9:18:18 GMT
You said I was offended by you posting that doodle. That is the lie. I’m not offended, I just didn’t bother to post a doodle that’s freely available on the internet and that struck your Message Board Hero nerve. So you lied.
You lying piece of shit… That was posted after you said I was offended but where do I say I was offended? Oops, correction time. You said I objected to you posting it here. You never said I was offended.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 9:33:47 GMT
That was posted after you said I was offended but where do I say I was offended? Oops, correction time. You said I objected to you posting it here. You never said I was offended. Keep wiggling, Stamm. So where did I show any signs of offence to you posting that doodle? Here are the words I used. Having a sense of the ridiculous helps too. Of course this place wasn’t going to be bombed.You are allowed to use your powers of interpretation if you so wish.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 9:55:31 GMT
So where did I show any signs of offence to you posting that doodle? Here are the words I used. Having a sense of the ridiculous helps too. Of course this place wasn’t going to be bombed.You are allowed to use your powers of interpretation if you so wish. Okay, so comparing that cartoon to pissing on the Quran and claiming it will cause grief and complaints is not offense. Go it.
You're a jackass who avoids issues and makes ad hominem attacks. You have no clue what a self righteous blowhard you've become.
Pissing on the Koran wasn’t mentioned in the text in which you managed to find words of objection. Mind you, if someone wants to do that and put it in an art gallery it’s up to them. Beats learning how to draw any day.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 20:19:03 GMT
Pissing on the Koran wasn’t mentioned in the text in which you managed to find words of objection. Mind you, if someone wants to do that and put it in an art gallery it’s up to them. Beats learning how to draw any day. Wiggle wiggle. But anyway, you still lied.
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Oct 8, 2021 22:47:46 GMT
Obama compared 'Slandering the prophet of Islam' to images of Jesus being desecrated and churches being destroyed.
It was a sad day for free speech.
Nothing should be off limits to poke fun at, Islam included.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 23:10:19 GMT
Obama compared 'Slandering the prophet of Islam' to images of Jesus being desecrated and churches being destroyed. It was a sad day for free speech. Nothing should be off limits to poke fun at, Islam included. My main problem with his drawings (apart from them not very good) is that they were only done to get a reaction. The Last Temptation of Christ was very controversial (Paul Schrader‘s father asked him where it was showing so that he could protest outside the cinema) but that dealt with what they thought could have been going through Christ’s mind at the time. Four Lions pokes fun at Islamic fundamentalism and manages to be both funny and ultimately tragic. I’m not that mad about the Charlie Hebdo cartoons but at least they were making points and were better drawn (which might be why more people died).
|
|
|
Post by OldSamVimes on Oct 8, 2021 23:29:36 GMT
Obama compared 'Slandering the prophet of Islam' to images of Jesus being desecrated and churches being destroyed. It was a sad day for free speech. Nothing should be off limits to poke fun at, Islam included. My main problem with his drawings (apart from them not very good) is that they were only done to get a reaction. The Last Temptation of Christ was very controversial (Paul Schrader‘s father asked him where it was showing so that he could protest outside the cinema) but that dealt with what they thought could have been going through Christ’s mind at the time. Four Lions pokes fun at Islamic fundamentalism and manages to be both funny and ultimately tragic. I’m not that mad about the Charlie Hebdo cartoons but at least they were making points and were better drawn (which might be why more people died). I haven't seen them. I don't think anything should be off limits. If you can't handle folks poking fun at your religion, you're not a mature adult.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 8, 2021 23:41:22 GMT
My main problem with his drawings (apart from them not very good) is that they were only done to get a reaction. The Last Temptation of Christ was very controversial (Paul Schrader‘s father asked him where it was showing so that he could protest outside the cinema) but that dealt with what they thought could have been going through Christ’s mind at the time. Four Lions pokes fun at Islamic fundamentalism and manages to be both funny and ultimately tragic. I’m not that mad about the Charlie Hebdo cartoons but at least they were making points and were better drawn (which might be why more people died). I haven't seen them. I don't think anything should be off limits. If you can't handle folks poking fun at your religion, you're not a mature adult. I think that last bit is an over simplification but that’s what tends to happen. Some people are more easily triggered (Life of Brian being another example) but at least Christians just ban stuff and tend to avoid killing people.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 9, 2021 8:25:35 GMT
But anyway, you still lied. Oh, I see, you wiggled around and edited your post again. You've shown me no lie. I guess you were hoping I wouldn't double check and see your edit. You're trying to pull a shady one as usual.
You also lied about my wording. I said you objected, which you did. I didn't say you were offended.
Objected. Offended. See the difference now?
I corrected myself after noticing that I got the word wrong you paranoid fool. I even admitted that I used the wrong word as soon as I realised it And I didn’t object to you posting the picture so you lied (or perhaps you used the wrong word). Show me one phrase which might show me am objecting to you posting the picture. All I can think is that you are offended by me not posting that picture and using a ridiculously reason for not doing so but I’ll just put that down to your humour deficiencies.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 9, 2021 8:28:14 GMT
Obama compared 'Slandering the prophet of Islam' to images of Jesus being desecrated and churches being destroyed. It was a sad day for free speech. Nothing should be off limits to poke fun at, Islam included. I posted one of the pics which Stammaman was afraid to post. Dogs are considered unclean in Islam. So it's a parody of blasphemy.
You think he failed to notice that in your first reply
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 9, 2021 8:31:32 GMT
I think that last bit is an over simplification but that’s what tends to happen. Some people are more easily triggered (Life of Brian being another example) but at least Christians just ban stuff and tend to avoid killing people.
Now. There were less things to do back then so we had to make our own entertainment.
|
|
|
Post by theauxphou on Oct 9, 2021 10:39:24 GMT
That's ridiculous. Never cave into the self-appointed censors.
How do the offended think that’s Mohammad? It could be a depiction of any bearded turban-wearer. Muslims have never, in theory, seen Mohammad depicted, anyway.
|
|
|
Post by Stammerhead on Oct 9, 2021 18:51:15 GMT
I corrected myself after noticing that I got the word wrong you paranoid fool. I even admitted that I used the wrong word as soon as I realised it And I didn’t object to you posting the picture so you lied (or perhaps you used the wrong word). Show me one phrase which might show me am objecting to you posting the picture. All I can think is that you are offended by me not posting that picture and using a ridiculously reason for not doing so but I’ll just put that down to your humour deficiencies. I might as well beat this dead dog some more. But what pisses me off is your ad hominem attacks. We could have discussed this as an issue with that. That's the thing I hate about these boards and why I left filmboards.
You did object to posting the pic:
This below is complete paranoia. I just wanted to have a good row. This below is all I said on Monkeys' board. It's a primarily British board and I wanted to introduce the topic as British censorship and hypersensitivity to Islam as opposed to Americans who have less concern over Muslim immigration.
I still can't see where I object to YOU posting the picture. Perhaps if you hadn't been a dick in the first place before misrepresenting what I had written I wouldn't have gone and upset you with my words. There is a way you could have asked me why I didn't post the picture without accusing me of trying to wriggle out of it but perhaps that's not how you work. I mean, I even mocked what I had written in the OP but perhaps that's not good enough for you.
|
|