|
|
Post by thorshairspray on May 26, 2017 16:35:42 GMT
What about, what about, what about......just think of this white person who killed someone!!!! 80% of terrorist attacks are done by Muslims. This attack was done by a Muslim who had become radicalisied and killed for his god to get his 72 virgins. Just shut up. Yes, but, it is a SPECIFIC Muslim sect: WAHHABISM. Ahmadis do not carry out terrorist attacks; Druzes do not carry out terrorist attacks; Ismailis do not carry out terrorist attacks; Sufis do not carry out terrorist attacks. ISIS(ISIL), al Qaida, Boko Haram, the Taliban, Hamas, etc, are all made up of Wahhabis. Yes and that is the sect that is infesting British Mosques, funded by the Saudis. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 16:36:59 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on May 26, 2017 16:37:16 GMT
According to German radio news, it was a revenge act. Apparently the bomber wanted to avenge a friend being killed by youngsters. So what? Seriously, so what? Should I now go blow up a school in Iran for "revenge?" |
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on May 26, 2017 16:38:35 GMT
Yes, it's insane. That doesn't stop it happening. Demonstrate how. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 16:40:02 GMT
tpfkar So which do you wish to dispute? That you're an ever-wailing gross hypocrite constantly saying nothing, or that 100% of terrorist attacks are by humans, every terror attack in history is by "extremists, or that you'll have more hissys.
There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white). |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 16:44:50 GMT
tpfkar It's insane that you people are so wed to pedophilia nad that you want to blame child-rape on "PC". Is it one-off? Or did they green-light child-rape because of PC, or were they just worried about "ethnic origins". And, of course, why weren't they on it regardless of who gives what shit who's doing it, lily white or not.
There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white). |
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on May 26, 2017 16:45:51 GMT
tpfkar So which do you wish to dispute? That you're an ever-wailing gross hypocrite constantly saying nothing, or that 100% of terrorist attacks are by humans, every terror attack in history is by "extremists, or that you'll have more hissys.
There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white).I fully accept that all terror attacks are committed by humans. I also accept that the majority of them are committed by men. So do you accept of these attacks by human males, the vast majority of them follow a specific religion? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 16:48:48 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by clusium on May 26, 2017 16:50:22 GMT
Yes, but, it is a SPECIFIC Muslim sect: WAHHABISM. Ahmadis do not carry out terrorist attacks; Druzes do not carry out terrorist attacks; Ismailis do not carry out terrorist attacks; Sufis do not carry out terrorist attacks. ISIS(ISIL), al Qaida, Boko Haram, the Taliban, Hamas, etc, are all made up of Wahhabis. Yes and that is the sect that is infesting British Mosques, funded by the Saudis. And that is the sect we are all up against!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on May 26, 2017 16:56:22 GMT
tpfkar It's insane that you people are so wed to pedophilia nad that you want to blame child-rape on "PC". Is it one-off? Or did they green-light child-rape because of PC, or were they just worried about "ethnic origins". And, of course, why weren't they on it regardless of who gives what shit who's doing it, lily white or not.
There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white).Yes, that is totally whats happened. Is what a one off? The "one off" refers to attacks. Okay, so you're an idiot. The staff were afraid to raise concerns because the attackers were Pakistanis and they didn't want to be labelled racist. That is what the quote says. Nobody claimed that people "green lit" child rape if the attacker was Muslim you tit. The rapes were happening and the people who should have investigated didn't because they were afraid of being labelled racist. Which is the entire fucking point. That was what the report said, that the authorities failed and part of that failure was fear of upsetting social cohesion, fear of labeling the Pakistani community and fear of being called racist. These people are spineless weasels, that doesn't change the fact that the actual report into this identified these things as causes. Do you have an actual rebuttal to the report based on evidence? Or are you simply going to keep saying "Nu uh, thats dumb!" |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 16:57:06 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by thorshairspray on May 26, 2017 16:57:56 GMT
Or, we identify why they do it and stop that where possible. So does it make sense to tackle the cause of an issue? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 17:05:54 GMT
tpfkar Yes, that's totally another nothing answer from you. So what.  The cognitively-impaired drooler is having another hissy, who knew? "PC" did it man. They're good with child rape. as long as it's one-off but systemic and Asian Muslim doing it, nut not because of Asian Muslims.  And that is different from green lighting it because "just shut up!". Sure the appeals to "social cohesion" and the PC fear of being called racist got them all on board the child-rape train. You guys really need an active volcano. They aren't the only ones suckling on "PC", or even the hardest. Yes, the narrative is absurdly tendentious for purposes of cover. And you've cornered the market on the dumb baby-speak.
There is a serious problem within the Muslim Asian community when it comes to the sexual abuse of young girls(mainly white). |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 17:18:43 GMT
Here you go Rabbit. Out for my morning jog and I came across this site:  That's a Christian charity shop in the Withington area of Manchester. Somebody had thrown red paint on it and on the childs teddy they placed on the step and packed it with human excrement. To me the meaning red paint to symbolise blood,teddy bear to symbolise children and shit to say the murder of Christian children doesn't mean shit to us. Less than a hundred yards from that shop a suspect was arrested in connection with the bombing. When I posted this on the politics board one person told me it could have been non Muslims trying to make Muslims look bad. The sad truth is there are thousands of Muslims in Manchester capable of doing that and far worse. But there are people who will go to any lenghts to defend them. You have no idea of the situation I'm living in Rabbit. |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 17:20:39 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 26, 2017 17:33:07 GMT
Here you go Rabbit. Out for my morning jog and I came across this site: That's a Christian charity shop in the Withington area of Manchester. Somebody had thrown red paint on it and on the childs teddy they placed on the step and packed it with human excrement. To me the meaning red paint to symbolise blood,teddy bear to symbolise children and shit to say the murder of Christian children doesn't mean shit to us. Less than a hundred yards from that shop a suspect was arrested in connection with the bombing. When I posted this on the politics board one person told me it could have been non Muslims trying to make Muslims look bad. The sad truth is there are thousands of Muslims in Manchester capable of doing that and far worse. But there are people who will go to any lenghts to defend them. You have no idea of the situation I'm living in Rabbit. Have you got any proof that Muslims did it, and not NWO stooges trying to start a religious war? |
|
|
|
Post by cupcakes on May 26, 2017 17:35:07 GMT
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 17:43:33 GMT
Here you go Rabbit. Out for my morning jog and I came across this site: That's a Christian charity shop in the Withington area of Manchester. Somebody had thrown red paint on it and on the childs teddy they placed on the step and packed it with human excrement. To me the meaning red paint to symbolise blood,teddy bear to symbolise children and shit to say the murder of Christian children doesn't mean shit to us. Less than a hundred yards from that shop a suspect was arrested in connection with the bombing. When I posted this on the politics board one person told me it could have been non Muslims trying to make Muslims look bad. The sad truth is there are thousands of Muslims in Manchester capable of doing that and far worse. But there are people who will go to any lenghts to defend them. You have no idea of the situation I'm living in Rabbit. Have you got any proof that Muslims did it, and not NWO stooges trying to start a religious war? So the vandalizing of that charity shop was a false flag I don't have words. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 17:46:47 GMT
Stop putting words in my mouth Rabbit. What this thread has illustrated that you don't actually give a shit about anybody or anything save being right. |
|
|
|
Post by The Herald Erjen on May 26, 2017 17:50:53 GMT
Have you got any proof that Muslims did it, and not NWO stooges trying to start a religious war? So the vandalizing of that charity shop was a false flag I don't have words. Now, now. I didn't say it was a false flag. I simply asked a question. A bucket of red paint and a teddy bear full of excrement. A bit corny and contrived, don't you think? I'll rephrase the question (just for you). Do you have any proof that Muslims did this, and not someone else, with the intention of inciting a religious war? |
|
