|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 23, 2017 0:01:12 GMT
With those first 4 episodes, is it better than anything from the old TP at its best?
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on May 23, 2017 0:13:45 GMT
With those first 4 episodes, is it better than anything from the old TP at its best?  HELL NO. Unless the next 2 episodes somehow are the exact opposites of that nonsensical pointless shit the first 2 episodes were. If it's the same tree with a brain stupidity that only acid drenched middle school drop outs would think is clever then Hell FUCKING No!!!!! |
|
|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 23, 2017 2:38:12 GMT
With those first 4 episodes, is it better than anything from the old TP at its best? HELL NO. Unless the next 2 episodes somehow are the exact opposites of that nonsensical pointless shit the first 2 episodes were. If it's the same tree with a brain stupidity that only acid drenched middle school drop outs would think is clever then Hell FUCKING No!!!!! Looking at user reviews on IMDB and Metacritic, people say the new one is better. |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on May 23, 2017 3:06:08 GMT
HELL NO. Unless the next 2 episodes somehow are the exact opposites of that nonsensical pointless shit the first 2 episodes were. If it's the same tree with a brain stupidity that only acid drenched middle school drop outs would think is clever then Hell FUCKING No!!!!! Looking at user reviews on IMDB and Metacritic, people say the new one is better. The critics and insecure fanboys have always gobbled Lynch's nuts. Emperors new clothes syndrome. Everyone is afraid to admit it's the same recycled fevered dream pretentiousness Lynch has lazily been squirting out of his bottom for well over a decade. As long as morons praise his lazy rehashed nonsense Lynch will cut and paste and laugh all the way to the bank. I'm confident enough to know I'm intelligent so I don't need strangers to pat me on the back and say "You 'get it' too so you're clever just like us. Rotten Tomatoes confirmed it." Do you really need affirmation of that nature? |
|
barkingbaphomet
Junior Member
all backlit and creepysmoking
@barkingbaphomet
Posts: 2,252
Likes: 1,006
|
Post by barkingbaphomet on May 23, 2017 5:03:43 GMT
so far, no. but it's too early to tell, really.
|
|
appletart
New Member
@appletart
Posts: 18
Likes: 8
 
|
Post by appletart on May 23, 2017 5:39:41 GMT
Too early to tell, for me. Definitely not better than S1. Better than S2? Maybe.
|
|
|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 23, 2017 6:03:44 GMT
so far, no. but it's too early to tell, really. If it's too early then why are some saying it's the best & whatnot? |
|
|
|
Post by bonerxmas on May 23, 2017 6:13:29 GMT
so far, no. but it's too early to tell, really. If it's too early then why are some saying it's the best & whatnot? those people do not understand how time works, they think it can go backwords |
|
|
|
Post by THawk on May 23, 2017 12:44:57 GMT
I've just seen the first episode. Is horror porn the new normal? Was there truly a need for such a graphic scene?
|
|
imdbuser
New Member
@imdbuser
Posts: 11
Likes: 7
|
Post by imdbuser on May 23, 2017 22:30:44 GMT
The new season's great.
|
|
|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 24, 2017 1:28:43 GMT
Looking at user reviews on IMDB and Metacritic, people say the new one is better. The critics and insecure fanboys have always gobbled Lynch's nuts. Emperors new clothes syndrome. Everyone is afraid to admit it's the same recycled fevered dream pretentiousness Lynch has lazily been squirting out of his bottom for well over a decade. As long as morons praise his lazy rehashed nonsense Lynch will cut and paste and laugh all the way to the bank. I'm confident enough to know I'm intelligent so I don't need strangers to pat me on the back and say "You 'get it' too so you're clever just like us. Rotten Tomatoes confirmed it." Do you really need affirmation of that nature? I'm guessing you didn't think "Inland Empire" was as good as "Blue Velvet"? |
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on May 24, 2017 1:37:47 GMT
You guess correctly sir. I mean madam. wink wink. Which do you like better?
|
|
|
|
Post by fartyfartsalot on May 24, 2017 3:37:14 GMT
Blue Velvet, by far.
|
|
|
|
Post by poelzig on May 24, 2017 4:35:34 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by dk37 on May 25, 2017 13:33:45 GMT
It might be better. The original was filled with too much fodder imo (Lynch didn't direct most of the episodes), whereas the new season is right on point. The new season is also more like Mulholland dr, which I prefer anyway.
|
|
|
|
Post by naterdawg on May 26, 2017 17:54:15 GMT
Great, so far.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 31, 2017 9:43:29 GMT
It might be better. The original was filled with too much fodder imo (Lynch didn't direct most of the episodes), whereas the new season is right on point. I feel the exact opposite. A lot of the new season feels very drawn out and padded, and then I'm reminded that Showtime doubled the number of episodes originally intended. But episode 4 did feel like a return to form for me. |
|
|
|
Post by dk37 on Jun 1, 2017 2:45:58 GMT
|
|
|
|
Post by Larcen26 on Jun 1, 2017 15:39:01 GMT
The new one is FAAAAAR more "Lynchy" than the original Twin Peaks ever was.
With free reign, it is much closer to Eraserhead than when he had to try for some network mass appeal.
So if you are more of a David Lynch fan than you are a Twin Peaks fan, you will like this one more.
If you like Twin Peaks more than other David Lynch, the original is better.
I am in the latter camp so far, but want to see where it goes.
|
|
Trigonomics
Sophomore
@trigonomics
Posts: 122
Likes: 49
|
Post by Trigonomics on Jun 2, 2017 14:26:48 GMT
Better than season 2, but maybe not better than season 1. And I do absolutely love the new season so far.
|
|
