|
|
Post by hairybuttcheeks on May 24, 2017 17:18:51 GMT
4 games to 1. that is prett compellng evidence that the bulls are not better than the warriors.
But of course nobody will admit t beause nostalgia. "yeah jordan and space jam! my youth!'
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 24, 2017 17:48:02 GMT
4 games to 1. that is prett compellng evidence that the bulls are not better than the warriors. But of course nobody will admit t beause nostalgia. "yeah jordan and space jam! my youth!' i actually agree with this - but i go Warriors 4-2 i just fail to see the Bulls team keeping up with Steph, Klay, Durant - throw some grittiness in there like Green and this NHL Goon they have to combat Rodman. Jordan's eliteness ala James steals a game or 2 - but I can't see them pulling this out with the likes of Luc Longley and Ron Harper in their starting lineup. |
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 24, 2017 17:56:32 GMT
A second thread on this subject?
|
|
|
|
Post by hairybuttcheeks on May 24, 2017 18:48:56 GMT
yes. people need to stop being based toward the bulls because it reminds them of a better time n their life and space jam. it is sad how many people here think the teams of their youth are better than the elit teams today.;
|
|
|
|
Post by nutsberryfarm 🏜 on May 24, 2017 18:51:25 GMT
what about the 1992 blazers?
|
|
|
|
Post by marsexplorer on May 24, 2017 18:52:22 GMT
yes. people need to stop being based toward the bulls because it reminds them of a better time n their life and space jam. it is sad how many people here think the teams of their youth are better than the elit teams today.; Space Jam? Who the hell cares about Space Jam? |
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 24, 2017 20:25:37 GMT
yes. people need to stop being based toward the bulls because it reminds them of a better time n their life and space jam. it is sad how many people here think the teams of their youth are better than the elit teams today.; You never answered my question in the other thread. Which rules are we using? Because the way defense was played and allowed to be played were completely different back then, and moving screens are essentially never called in today's 'everybody jacks up 40 3s per game' NBA. And you were called for a foul for looking at Jordan wrong in his heyday. There are so many variables that go beyond the physical matchups. I'm as big a Jordan fan as there is, and I just might just give the edge to the Warriors purely for their depth. I don't see who on the Warriors defends Jordan & Pippen, but on the flipside I don't see the Bulls matching up well with the Warriors. Too much shooting, too much ball handling. Jordan would shut down Curry, but Draymond could become the distributor. Pippen would eat Klay alive and Rodman would make Draymond lose his mind and get ejected...but they'd still have no answer for Durant. Nobody on the Bulls had the defensive versatility to deal with Durant outside of maybe Pippen, but again he can't guard everyone. And the Warriors bench is just more talented from top to bottom. The Bulls would have to get physical and control the pace, which brings us back to my original point-- it depends how the game is officiated. |
|
|
|
Post by sdm3 on May 24, 2017 23:26:34 GMT
A simulator is "compelling evidence"?
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2017 0:32:45 GMT
yes. people need to stop being based toward the bulls because it reminds them of a better time n their life and space jam. it is sad how many people here think the teams of their youth are better than the elit teams today.; Space Jam? Who the hell cares about Space Jam? a few six year old kids one time... |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 25, 2017 0:33:19 GMT
A simulator is "compelling evidence"? Only if he ran it 10,000 times. |
|
|
|
Post by hairybuttcheeks on May 25, 2017 1:02:23 GMT
Yes, not just compelling evidence, but nearly proof. what more do you need?
|
|
|
|
Post by theauxphou on May 25, 2017 1:12:59 GMT
What about the '92/'93 Mavericks? ¯\_㋛_/¯
|
|
|
|
Post by nutsberryfarm 🏜 on May 26, 2017 19:01:06 GMT
What about the '92/'93 Mavericks? ¯\_㋛_/¯was mark aguirre on that team? |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 19:17:09 GMT
I think the Bulls are better, never heard of The Warriors, don't even know what colours they wear, neither does anyone in Britain, so they must be pretty ordinary. No, I don't think the Warriors are very good.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 19:28:15 GMT
yes. people need to stop being based toward the bulls because it reminds them of a better time n their life and space jam. it is sad how many people here think the teams of their youth are better than the elit teams today.; You never answered my question in the other thread. Which rules are we using? Because the way defense was played and allowed to be played were completely different back then, and moving screens are essentially never called in today's 'everybody jacks up 40 3s per game' NBA. And you were called for a foul for looking at Jordan wrong in his heyday. There are so many variables that go beyond the physical matchups. I'm as big a Jordan fan as there is, and I just might just give the edge to the Warriors purely for their depth. I don't see who on the Warriors defends Jordan & Pippen, but on the flipside I don't see the Bulls matching up well with the Warriors. Too much shooting, too much ball handling. Jordan would shut down Curry, but Draymond could become the distributor. Pippen would eat Klay alive and Rodman would make Draymond lose his mind and get ejected...but they'd still have no answer for Durant. Nobody on the Bulls had the defensive versatility to deal with Durant outside of maybe Pippen, but again he can't guard everyone. And the Warriors bench is just more talented from top to bottom. The Bulls would have to get physical and control the pace, which brings us back to my original point-- it depends how the game is officiated. Have Jordan guard Curry, Harper guard Klay, and Pippen guard Durant. Plus you got Kukoc to create matchup problems at the other end. And like you said, Dennis Rodman would psychologically own Draymond Green |
|
|
|
Post by Rey Kahuka on May 26, 2017 20:30:32 GMT
Kukoc was great for his day, he'd be like your average European big today. That's the truth.
|
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 20:55:30 GMT
Kukoc was great for his day, he'd be like your average European big today. That's the truth. Kukoc spent a cup of coffee on the Sixers. I always liked him. Tough, savvy, gritty guy with a high basketball IQ. If Dario Saric turns into 3/4 of the player is Kukoc was - they have a keeper and at least a strong 6 man for years to come. |
|
Deleted
Deleted Member
@Deleted
Posts: 0
Likes:
|
Post by Deleted on May 26, 2017 22:42:24 GMT
Kukoc was great for his day, he'd be like your average European big today. That's the truth. Given his style of play, I would say he'd fit in better in today's game under today's rules. |
|
|
|
Post by hairybuttcheeks on May 26, 2017 22:51:08 GMT
why are we arguing? my simulator already gavve us the results. the warriors won easily.
|
|
|
|
Post by theauxphou on May 27, 2017 2:21:46 GMT
What about the '92/'93 Mavericks? ¯\_㋛_/¯was mark aguirre on that team? I think he'd already moved on to the Pistons by then, if I recall correctly. |
|
