|
Post by hi224 on Apr 17, 2022 15:38:03 GMT
I always wonder how many people who whine about "Me Too going to far!!!" ever spared a thought when we found out "time and again" that woman who were sexually assaulted/harassed had no recourse through the years. Like, that documentary about how women in the army who reported rapes were silenced and kicked out of the army while the men who raped them went unpunished, and nobody said anything. Then a guy gets fired for getting handy on set, and everyone's like, "Whats' happening to out society?!?!?!?!"
If anyone is interested, the doc is called The Invisible War. It as released in 2012.
And what of the men who were imprisoned for years for rape who are now free due to DNA evidence proving they couldn't have done it? I'm no MRA supporter for sure, and no doubt a goodly number of those convictions were due to lazy/corrupt/incompetent cops looking for a fast arrest...but some of them were also the result of the simple fact that the woman lied. Are we to just ignore that? And you're simply reinforcing my original contention that these sorts of occurrences need to be properly and publicly tried in the correct venue, as apart from trial-by-opinion and press. The justice system is far from perfect, I'd be the first to say; but I'll sure as hell rely on it a lot quicker than I will the sort of 'trial' the MeToo crowd seems all to happy to rely on. any accuser is a liar.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Apr 19, 2022 3:41:28 GMT
And what of the men who were imprisoned for years for rape who are now free due to DNA evidence proving they couldn't have done it? I'm no MRA supporter for sure, and no doubt a goodly number of those convictions were due to lazy/corrupt/incompetent cops looking for a fast arrest...but some of them were also the result of the simple fact that the woman lied. Are we to just ignore that? And you're simply reinforcing my original contention that these sorts of occurrences need to be properly and publicly tried in the correct venue, as apart from trial-by-opinion and press. The justice system is far from perfect, I'd be the first to say; but I'll sure as hell rely on it a lot quicker than I will the sort of 'trial' the MeToo crowd seems all to happy to rely on. yep lets ignore everybody. I see you're still engaging in 'useless debate'--useless in your case, as you aren't attempting debate at all.
|
|
|
Post by amyghost on Apr 19, 2022 3:43:03 GMT
And what of the men who were imprisoned for years for rape who are now free due to DNA evidence proving they couldn't have done it? I'm no MRA supporter for sure, and no doubt a goodly number of those convictions were due to lazy/corrupt/incompetent cops looking for a fast arrest...but some of them were also the result of the simple fact that the woman lied. Are we to just ignore that? And you're simply reinforcing my original contention that these sorts of occurrences need to be properly and publicly tried in the correct venue, as apart from trial-by-opinion and press. The justice system is far from perfect, I'd be the first to say; but I'll sure as hell rely on it a lot quicker than I will the sort of 'trial' the MeToo crowd seems all to happy to rely on. any accuser is a liar. Do you think very much? Because, judging by your responses to this point, it doesn't seem to be a habit you have much familiarity with.
|
|
|
Post by politicidal on Apr 29, 2022 20:08:35 GMT
Replaced by Bruce Greenwood.
|
|